Cybercriminalité

GLACY/ CyberCrime@EAP: International workshop on mainstreaming judicial training on cybercrime and electronic evidence, Bucharest, Romania, 2-3 June 2014

• Mainstreaming Judicial Training on Cybercrime and Electronic Evidence: Nigel Jones, Esther George, Alexander Seger
• Experience in South-Eastern Europe, Judge Kornelija Ivanušić, Croatia
• Concept paper on cybercrime training for judges and prosecutors, Cristina Schulman, Ministry of justice, Romania
• Law, Information security, Computer forensics and electronic evidence, Adel Jomni,University of Montpellier

-------------------

GLACY Conference Getting Started, Dakar, Senegal, 24-27 March 2014

Cybercrime policies and strategies

• Politique et stratégie de lutte contre la cybercriminalité au Sénégal - Papa Assane Touré
• RSA National Cybersecurity Policy Framework, Irene Moetsana, South Africa
• Paula P. Ma’u, Kingdom of Tonga
• The Budapest Convention and the approach of the Council of Europe (Cristina Schulman, Romania)

Cybercrime versus cybersecurity strategies

• Cybercrime vs cybersecurity strategies, Estonia
• Cybercrime in Costa Rica: Actions taken to fight this crime, Marisel Rodriguez-Solis
• Cybersecurity vs Cybercrime strategies, Siaosi Sovaleni, Tonga

The role of capacity building

• Fighting Cybercrime: The Role of Capacity Building - The Policy of Japan Akino Kowashi
• Capacity building on cybercrime: advantages, Alexander Seger, Council of Europe

Round table: Elements of cybercrime strategies

• The PNP ACG Specialized Anti-Cybercrime Tainings, Philippines
• Building Partnerships to Combat Cybercrime, Betsy Broder, USA

Review of criminal justice capacities and support to priority countries

• Situation reports

Training Worpshop on international cooperation

• International cooperation on cybercrime and electronic evidence, AlexanderSeger, Council of Europe
• Chapter III of The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, Pedro Verdelho, Portugal
• Competencies and Functioning in Practice of the 24/7 Points of Contact Richard Downing, USA
• Centre for combating cyber Crimes, Eugeniu Moraru, Moldova
• High-tech Crime Department, Ivan Mijatovic, Croatia
• Demandes internationales de conservation rapide des données, Papa Gueye, Senegal
• Demandes internationales de conservation rapide des données, Eirik Tronnes, Norway
• Mutual assistance in accessing stored computer data (Article 31 Budapest Convention): competent authorities, channels of communication, practical experience, case studies, Branko Stamenkovic, Serbia
• Mutual assistance in accessing stored computer data, Paul Louw, South Africa
• Role of 24/7 contact point, Bilal Sen, Turkey
• Role of 24/7 points of contact regarding MLA requests for computer data/e-evidence, Cooperation with competent authorities, Ioana Albani, Romania
• Cybercrime Division MIA of Ukraine, Leonid Tymchenko, Ukraine
• Concept paper Training manual on international cooperation, Cristina Schulman, Romania

Workshop on cybercrime reporting systems and criminal justice statistics

• Cybercrime reporting mechanisms – Good practice study, Jean-Christophe Le Toquin
• Criminal justice statistics & Cybercrime reporting
• eCrime Reporting Challenges,Patrick Cain, APWG
• Good Practices on the Development of Information, Liliana Mesias Garcia, Colombia
• The Consumer Sentinel Network: A Law Enforcement Tool, Betsy Broder
• Good Practices on Criminal Justice Statics, Costa Rica
• Internet Crime Complaint Center, USA
• National Crime Agency, Damon Hayes, UK
• Pharos, Office Central de Lutte contre la Criminalité liée aux Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication, France
• Signal Spam, National Information Sharing Centre
• Computer Emergency Response Team of Mauritius