|
Intercultural Cities Index
Cities participating in the Intercultural cities programme undergo expert and
peer reviews of their policies, governance and practice. This review takes the
form of narrative reports and city profiles – a form which is very rich in content and
detail but is relatively heavy as a tool to monitor progress and communicate
results.
The Intercultural Cities Index is a complementary tool, capable of illustrating visually level of
achievement of each city, progress over time, and enabling comparison with other cities. This tool contains a limited number of strong indicators
which make it easier to identify and communicate where a city stands in
relation to intercultural
integration, where effort should be focused in the future and which other cities
could be a source of good practice in these particular areas.
Click on the image to access the
interactive Intercultural
Cities Index charts
hosted by the Compendium on cultural policies and trends in
Europe.
The Intercultural City Index s based on a
questionnaire involving 66 questions
grouped in 14 indicators with three distinct types of data.
Indicators have been weighed for relative importance. For each
indicator, the participating cities can reach up to 100 points
(which are consolidated for the general ICC Index). These indicators comprise: intercultural commitment;
education system; neighbourhoods; public services; business and
labour market; cultural and civil life policies; public spaces;
mediation and conflict resolution; language; media;
international outlook; intelligence/competence; welcoming of new
arrivals and
governance. Some of these indicators - education system;
neighbourhoods; public services; business and labour market;
cultural and civil life policies; public spaces are grouped in
a composite indicator called "urban policies through the
intercultural lens" or simply "intercultural lens".
Any city, regardless of whether it is a
member of the Intercultural cities network or not, can reply to
the Index questionnaire and have its results analysed.
Normative basis
Index
Questionnaire
Index results by city
Amadora (Portugal)
Arezzo (Italy)
Barcelona (Spain)
Beja (Portugal)
Bilbao (Spain)
Botkyrka (Sweden)
Campo Bisenzio
(Italy)
Cartagena (Spain)
Constanta (Romania)
Copenhagen (Denmark)
Donostia-San-Sebastian
(Spain)
Dortmund (Germany)
Dublin (Ireland)
Duisburg (Germany)
Erlangen (Germany)
Geneva (Switzerland)
Izhevsk (Udmart Republic, Russian Federation)
Jerez de la Frontera (Spain)
Limassol (Cyprus)
Lisbon (Portugal)
Lodi (Italy)
London Lewisham (United Kingdom)
Lublin (Poland)
Melitopol (Ukraine)
Mexico city (Mexico)
Montreal (Canada)
Munich (Germany)
Neuchâtel (Suisse)
Neukölln
(Berlin, Germany)
Offenburg
(Germany)
Oslo (Norway)
Patras (Greece)
Pécs (Hungary)
Pryluky (Ukraine)
Reggio-Emilia (Italy)
Rubicone (Italy)
Rijeka (Croatia)
Sabadell (Spain)
Sechenkivsky
(District of Kyiv, Ukraine)
Senigallia (Italy)
Subotica (Serbia)
Tenerife (Spain)
Tilburg (the Netherlands)
Turin (Italy)
Turnhout (Belgium)
Västerĺs (Sweden)
Zurich (Switzerland) |