Strasbourg, 10 July 2009

    T-TT(2009)12

    Franais

    Pdf

    EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON TRANSFRONTIER TELEVISION
    _______

    STANDING COMMITTEE ON TRANSFRONTIER TELEVISION

    (T-TT)
    ______

    44th meeting
    11 and 12 June 2009
    Agora Building
    Room G 01
    ______

    REPORT

    Item 1 of the agenda: Opening of the meeting and adoption of the agenda

    1. The meeting was opened by the Chair of the Standing Committee on Transfrontier Television (T-TT), Ms Nuran Yardimci (Turkey). She welcomed all delegates and recalled that the present meeting, devoted to the finalisation of the draft second amending protocol to the European Convention on Transfrontier Television, marked the end of a long process started in 2001. She recalled the preliminary work undertaken by the Standing Committee as well as the work of its drafting Group that started its work in 2007.

    2. The list of participants appears in Appendix I to this report.

    3. The Standing Committee adopted the agenda as reproduced in Appendix II.

    Item 2 of the agenda: Information by the Secretariat

    4. Mr Jan Kleijssen, Director of Standard Setting, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, informed the Standing Committee about the outcome of the first Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Media and New Communication Services, held in Reykjavik on 28 and 29 May 2009. The Conference addressed the theme “A new notion of media”, and resulted in the adoption of a political declaration and resolutions on various aspects of the theme discussed, including a plan of action which will constitute the basis of the work of the Steering Committee on the Media and New Communication Services (CDMC) for the next four years. In the political declaration, the ministers welcomed the revision of the European Convention on Transfrontier Television as a response to the diversification of communication platforms and information services and stated that the revision process should be completed at the earliest opportunity. The texts of the political declaration and the resolutions were distributed during the meeting.

    5. Referring to the necessary harmonisation of the Convention with the European Union Directive on audiovisual media services, Mr Kleijssen also drew the attention of the Standing Committee to the importance of the formulation of disconnection clauses to regulate the functioning of Council of Europe treaties in areas covered by Community law. He recalled that, for certain Council of Europe Conventions, disconnection clauses had been negotiated with the European Commission in 2005 and that they had been the subject of particular attention1 by the Committee of Legal Advisers on Public International Law (CAHDI). He therefore invited the Standing Committee to take the recommendations of the Council of Europe Legal Advise Department into account.

    Item 3 of the agenda: Signatures and ratifications of the Convention

    6. The Secretariat informed the Committee that the Parliament of Serbia had ratified the Convention on Transfrontier Television. After the deposit of the instrument of ratification by Serbia, the number of Parties to the Convention would rise to 34.

    Item 4 of the agenda: Exchange of information on the implementation of the Convention

    7. Given the time constraints of this particular meeting, delegates agreed to limit their interventions on this point of the agenda to priority matters. No urgent issues were raised.

    Item 5 of the agenda: Revision of the Convention

    8. The Standing Committee examined the draft second amending protocol to the European Convention on Transfrontier Television and its explanatory report (Document T-TT (2009)007). The draft, based on the provisional agreement on the draft amendments to the Convention as reached during the 43rd meeting of the T-TT on 12 to 14 November 2008 and confirmed, with a few amendments, during the consultation meeting held on 25 to 27 February 2009, had been sent for comments to the Council of Europe Legal Advice Department. The Standing Committee discussed the proposals made by the Legal Advice Department as well as a proposal by Reuters (Document T-TT (2009)008). Parties had no further comments on the provisional agreement.

    9. The Committee discussed the proposal by Reuters to incorporate a reference to intermediaries in Article 9 (Access of the public to information - short news reports). The proposal referred to recitals 38 and 39 of the AVMS Directive dealing with the right to short news reporting and underlined that the role of intermediaries, i.e. news agencies, was substantial to facilitate the purpose of the right of access to information. The Committee recalled that a similar debate within the EU had concluded in mentioning intermediaries only in the recitals to the Directive. The Standing Committee, noting that the role of intermediaries was mentioned in the explanatory report to the Convention, concluded that the Convention should not go further than the Directive.

    10. The Standing Committee agreed with the proposals made by the Legal Advice Department. With regard to the proposed disconnection clause, the Swiss delegation observed that the clause did not cover the situation of Parties, other than States belonging to the European Union or the European Economic Area , who had accepted to be bound by Community law on the subject covered by the Convention. The Standing Committee, recalling the importance of respecting the results of earlier negotiations between the Council of Europe and the European Commission on the issue of disconnection clauses, instructed the Secretariat to find an appropriate formulation in consultation with the Legal Advice Department and Switzerland.

    11. In conformity with Article 23, paragraph 3, of the Convention, the Standing Committee finalised the text of the draft second amending protocol to the European Convention on Transfrontier Television and explanatory report thereto and agreed to forward it to the Committee of Ministers for adoption and opening for signature, with the amendment for the disconnection clause to be settled by the Secretariat along the lines mentioned above. The United Kingdom reiterated its reservation in respect of Article 33, paragraphs 3 and 4, as worded in Article 46 of the draft amending protocol. No other reservations or objections were expressed.

    Item 6 of the agenda: Revision of the Explanatory Report to the Convention

12. The Standing Committee examined, in detail, the revised Explanatory Report to the Convention, taking account of the comments in respect thereof (Document T-TT (2009) 010). The comments concerned the paragraph related to Article 6, paragraph 3, on the prohibition of pornographic material on television. Further to some minor amendments, the Standing Committee agreed to the text of the Explanatory Report as reflected in document T-TT(2009)009rev.

    Item 7 of the agenda: Report of the T-TT to the Committee of Ministers

13. The Standing Committee examined its report to the Committee of Ministers on the revision of the ECTT and adopted it further to some minor changes (Document T-TT(2009)011rev).

14. The Committee also addressed the request made by the Committee of Ministers, during the 1048th meeting of their Deputies on 11 and 12 February 2009, “to provide information on the follow up given to Recommendation 1855 (2009) of the Parliamentary Assembly on the regulation of audiovisual media services when submitting an amending protocol to the European Convention on Transfrontier Television”. The Standing Committee adopted the comments as appended hereto (Appendix III).

    Item 8 of the agenda: Planning of future work

    15. The Secretariat recalled that, in line with the Committee of Ministers’ requirements, the texts agreed upon by the Standing Committee will be subject to editorial checking before they are submitted to the Committee of Ministers. In addition, the Parliamentary Assembly will be asked to give an opinion on the draft second amending protocol to the ECTT. The Standing Committee underlined that, through their delegations in the CDMC, all Council of Europe member states had been informed on the revision process and been invited to comment on the draft Convention in the consultation procedure.

    16. The Standing Committee expressed the hope that the Committee of Ministers will adopt the draft second amending Protocol and open it for signature as soon as possible. It was recalled that the Protocol will enter into force after acceptance or ratification by all Parties to the ECTT. However, Article 55 of the draft protocol enables Parties to declare that they will apply the amending protocol on a provisional basis.

    Item 9 of the agenda: Other business

    17. The Standing Committee welcomed the announcement by the Secretariat that it was envisaged to present the revised ECTT, renamed “Council of Europe Convention on transfrontier audiovisual media services” during a half day Conference to be organised possibly in the autumn.

    Item 10 of the agenda: Dates of forthcoming meetings

    18. The 45th plenary meeting of the Standing Committee will take place during the first months of 2010.

    * * *


    APPENDIX I

    List of participants

    T-TT MEMBERS / MEMBRES T-TT

    Albania/Albanie
    Mr PENI – e-mail : fpeni@mfa.gov.al

    Austria/Autriche
    Mr Michael KOGLER, Deputy Head of Department, Head of Division, Federal Chancellery, Constitutional Service, Media Department, Ballhausplatz 2, AT-1014 WIEN

    Bosnia and Herzegovina/Bosnie-Herzgovine
    Mrs Asja ROKSA-ZUBCEVIC, Head of Division for Audiovisual services and Internation Cooperation in Broadcasting, Communications Regulatory Agency, Mehmeda Spahe 1, 71000 Sarajevo

    Bulgaria/Bulgarie
    Ms Maya VAPTSAROVA, Member of Council for Electronic Media, 69, Shipchenski Prohod blvd., BG-1574 SOFIA

    Croatia/Croatie
    Mr Tomislav JELIĆ, Head of Department for European Integration, Ministry of Culture, Runjaninova 2, HR-1000 ZAGREB

    Ms Nives ZVONARIC, legal Adviser, Electronic Media Agency, Palmoticeva 60, HR – 1000 ZAGREB

    Cyprus/Chypre

    Czech Republic/Rpublique Tchque
    Mr Zdenek MALACH, Head of License Department Council for Radio and TV Broadcasting, CZ-118 11 PRAHA 1

    Mr Jan FUCIK, Ministry of culture, Department of media and audiovision, CZ-118 11 PRAHA 1

    Estonia/Estonie
    Mr Peeter SOOKRUUS, Ministry of Culture, 23 Suur-Karja Street, 15076 TALLINN

    Finland/Finlande
    Mr Jussi MKINEN, Ministerial Adviser, Media issues, Ministry of Transport and Communications, P.O. Box 31, FI-00023 Government Finland

    France
    M. Xavier INGLEBERT, Adjoint au chef du bureau des affaires europennes et internationales, Direction du Dveloppement des Mdias, 69 rue de Varenne, FR-75348 PARIS 07 SP

    Germany/Allemagne
    Ms Susanne DING, Referentin beim Beauftragten der Bundesregierung fr Kultur und Medien (BKM)
    Referat K 31: Internationale Zusammenarbeit im Medienbereich, Rundfunk
    Stresemannstrasse 94 - 10963 Berlin

    Dr. Tim SCHNBORN, LL.M., Adviser for Media Affairs, Representation of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate, to the European Union, Avenue de Tervuren 60, BE-1040 BRUSSELS, Belgium

    Hungary/Hongrie
    Dr Gyrgy OCSK, Head of Department, Presidential Secretariat, National Radio and Television Commission (ORTT), Reviczky utca 5, HU-1088 BUDAPEST

    Italy/Italie
    Mrs Daniela ESPOSITO VEZZOLER, Autorit per le garanzie nelle comunicazioni, Italian Communication Authority (AGCOM), Via Poli, 29, IT-ROME

    Latvia/Lettonie
    Mrs Dace BUCENIECE, Vice-chairperson of the National Broadcasting Council of Latvia, Smilsu 1/3, LV-1939 RIGA

    Liechtenstein

    Lithuania/Lituanie
    Mr Nerijus MALIUKEVIČIUS, Executive Director, Radio and Television Commission of Lithuania, Vytenio str. 6, LT-03113 VILNIUS

    Malta/Malte
    Dr Yana HABER, Senior Case officer, Office of the permanent Secretary within the Office of the Prime Minister,

    Moldova
    Mr Vitalie TABUNSCIC, Council for coordination on Audiovisual of Moldova, Mihai Eminescu Str. 28, MD-2012 CHISINAU

    Montenegro/ Montngro
    Ms Jadranka VOJVODIC, Deputy Director, Broadcasting Agency of Montenegro

    Norway/Norvge
    Mr Olav GUNTVEDT, Assistant Director General, Norwegian Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs, PO.Box 8030 Dep, NO-0030 OSLO

    Poland/Pologne
    Ms Malgorzata PEK, Deputy Director of the Legal Department, National Broadcasting Council, Skwer Kardinala Wysznskiego 9, PL-01-015 WARSAW

    Portugal
    Mrs Maria Margarida RIBES, Gabinete para os Meios de Comunicao Social, Palcio Foz, Praa dos Restauradores, PT-1250-187 LISBOA

    Romania/Roumanie
    Mr Rasvan POPESCU, President of the National Broadcasting Council (CNA), Bd Libertatii nr. 14, sector 5, RO-50706 BUCAREST

    San Marino/Saint-Marin

    Slovak Republic/Rpublique Slovaque
    Mr Martin KRIZAN, Legal Section of the Office, Council for Broadcasting and Retransmission of the Slovak Republic, Kolarska 6, SK-81000 BRATISLAVA

    Slovenia/Slovnie

    Spain/Espagne
    Ms Teresa KUCHKOVSKY JIMENEZ, Legal Advisor, Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade of Spain

    Switzerland/Suisse
    Mr Franz ZELLER, Conseiller Juridique, Mdias nationaux et internationaux, Office fdral de la communication, Dpartement fdral de l'environnement, des transports, de l'nergie et de la communication, 44, rue de l'Avenir, CH-2501 BIENNE

    "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"/"L'ex-Rpublique Yougoslave de Macdoine"
    Mrs Emilija JANEVSKA, Head of the Department for programming issues, Broadcasting Council, Bul "Marks & Engels" 3, MK-1000 SKOPJE

    Turkey/Turquie
    Mrs Nuran YARDIMCI, Expert at the Department of International Relations of Radio and Television Supreme Council, Bilkent Plaza B2 Blok, TR-06530 BILKENT ANKARA (CHAIR)

    Mr Hamit ERSOY, Head of the Department of International Relations of Radio and Television Supreme Council, Bilkent Plaza B2 Blok, TR-06530 BILKENT ANKARA

    United Kingdom/Royaume-Uni
    Mr Peter DOOGAN, Senior Policy Adviser, International Broadcasting, Media Team, Department for Culture, Media and Sport, 2-4 Cockspur Street, GB-LONDON SW1Y 5DH

    Holy See/Saint-Sige
    M. Rgis DE KALBERMATTEN, Dlgu du Saint-Sige au Comit Permanent sur la Tlvision Transfrontire, Gravelone 55, CH-1950 SION

    OBSERVER DELEGATES / DELEGUES OBSERVATEURS

    Andorra/Andorre

    Armenia/Armnie

    Azerbaijan/Azerbaidjan

    Belarus

    Belgium/Belgique

    Denmark/Danemark

    Georgia/Gorgie
    Mr Giorgi RATISHVILI, Chef du Dpartement de rgulation de la diffusion de la Commission Nationale des Communications de la Gorgie, 50 rue Kretevan Tsamebuli, 0144 Tbilissi

    Mrs Nino NIJARADZE, Senior spcialiste au Dpartement juridique de la Commission Nationale des Communication de la Gorgie, 50 rue Kretevan Tsamebuli, 0144 Tbilissi

    Greece/Grce

    Iceland/Islande

    Ireland/Irlande

    Luxembourg

    Monaco

    Netherlands/Pays-Bas
    Mr Freek INGEN HOUSZ
    Directie Media, Letteren en Bibliotheken/IPC 3400, Department for Media, Literature and Libraries/IPC 3400 ,Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap/
    Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, Rijnstraat 50, P.O. Box 16375, 2500 BJ Den Haag

    Russian Federation/Fdration de Russie
    Mrs Nataliya V. ROMASHOVA, Deputy Director, Department for State Policy in Mass Media, Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications, Dept of the State Policy in Mass Media, Tverskaya Str. 7, RU-MOSCOW

    Mrs Svetlana FIRSOVA, Leader expert of the Department for mass media policy of the Ministry of Telecom and mass communications of Russia, Tverskaya Str. 7, RU-MOSCOW

    Serbia/Serbie

    Sweden/Sude

    Ukraine
    Mr Vladyslav LIASOVSKYI, Executive Secretary, National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting, 2 Proreznaya Street, 406, KYIV

    European Commission/Commission europenne

    * * *

    SECRETARIAT

    Mr Jan KLEIJSSEN, Director, Directorate of Standard Setting / Directeur, Direction des Activits Normatives, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs / Chef de la Division Mdias et Socit de l’Information, Direction Gnrale des Droits de l’Homme et des Affaires Juridiques

    Mr Jeroen SCHOKKENBROEK, Head of Human Rights development Department, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs / Chef du Service du dveloppement des droits de l’Homme, Direction Gnrale des droits de l’homme et des affaires juridiques

    Mrs Anita VAN DE KAR-BACHELET, Administrator, Media and Information Society Division, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs / Administratrice, Division Media et Socit de l'Information, Direction Gnrale des droits de l'Homme et des affaires juridiques

    Mrs Corinne GAVRILOVIC, Assistant, Media and Information Society Division, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs / Administratrice, Division Media et Socit de l'Information, Direction Gnrale des droits de l'Homme et des affaires juridiques

    APPENDIX II

    Agenda

    1. Opening of the meeting and adoption of the agenda

    Working document

    - Annotations on the draft agenda
    (Document T-TT(2009)OJ2Notes)

    2. Information by the Secretariat

    3. Signatures and ratifications of the Convention

    4. Exchange of information on the implementation of the Convention

    5. Revision of the Convention

    Working Documents

    - Draft second amending protocol to the European Convention on Transfrontier Television and explanatory report (Document T-TT(2009)007

    - Provisional agreement on the draft amendments to the European Convention on Transfrontier Television and its preamble
    (Document T-TT(2009)005) (merging documents T-TT(2008)002 + T-TT(2008)003Rev)

      - Comments on the provisional agreement (Document T-TT(2009)008)

    Information documents

    - Audiovisual Media Services Directive 2007/65/EC amending the TVWF Directive

    - Report of the Consultation (Feb. 2009) on the revision of the ECTT (Document T-TT(2009)006)

    - Report of the 43rd meeting of the Standing Committee
    (Document T-TT(2008)004)

    - Secretariat memorandum on the proposed amendments to Articles 2, 10 and 27 of the European Convention on Transfrontier Television and their compatibility with Community law
    (Document T-TT(2009)002)

    - Rules of procedure
    (Document T-TT(2006)024)

    6. Revision of the Explanatory Report to the Convention

    Working Documents

    - Draft explanatory Report to the revised ECTT
    (Document T-TT(2009)009) (previously T-TT-GDR(2008)002Rev)

    - Comments on the draft explanatory report of the revised Convention

      (Document T-TT (2009)010)

    7. Examination of the Report of the Standing Committee to the Committee of Ministers
    Working Document

    - Report of the Standing Committee to the Committee of Ministers on the revision of the ECTT (Document T-TT(2009)011)

    Information document

    - PACE Recommendation (1855) 2009 on “The regulation of audio-visual media services”

    8. Planning of future work

    9. Other business

    10. Dates of forthcoming meetings

    APPENDIX III

    Comments of the Standing Committee on Recommendation 1855 (2009) of the Parliamentary Assembly on “the regulation of audiovisual media services”

    10.1 The possibilities for guiding the interpretation and supervising the application of this new convention should be reinforced

    The Standing Committee supports the view of the Assembly that the new Council of Europe Convention, revising the European Convention on Transfrontier Television, should provide sufficient guidance to its Parties in interpreting and applying its provisions, and in particular in determining what is and what is not included within its scope. The Standing Committee is of the opinion that the explanations contained in the explanatory report to the draft revised Convention (document T-TT-(2009)009) fulfill this role in a satisfactory manner. Reference is made in particular to paragraphs 88 to 149 of this draft report. It is furthermore recalled that one of the principal functions of the Standing Committee is to make recommendations to the Parties concerning the application of the Convention. It is also possible that questions concerning its interpretation will arise, all the more so since the Convention deals with an area which is subject to rapid changes. Article 25 of the draft revised Convention empowers the Standing Committee to examine any such question raised by a Party.

    10.2 The “public service mission” for audiovisual media services should be defined and explained

    The Standing Committee recalls that the purpose of the Convention is not to regulate the provision and activities of audiovisual media services as a whole, nor is it designed to harmonise the Parties’ rules on this issue. It aims to lay down basic standards by which audiovisual media services may enjoy unhindered transfrontier circulation. The Standing Committee concludes that this Convention is not the appropriate legal instrument to give an answer to the questions surrounding the definition of “public service mission” of media services. It furthermore underlines that there is no common European definition of public service media and/or mission. The Standing Committee notes that the draft explanatory report to Article 12, paragraph 3, of the draft revised Convention (paragraph 272) refers to the contents of Recommendation Rec(2007)3 of the Committee of Ministers on the remit of public service media in the information society which contains guidance on the key elements of the public service remit. Paragraph 273 of the draft explanatory report explains that “broadcasters who have a public service mission may include privately-owned broadcasters whose licences or other conditions of operation require them to transmit programming which is of benefit to cultural, educational, or other public objectives”.

    10.3 The role of the Standing Committee should be re-examined with regard to its supervisory function over the compliance of conventional obligations

    It is recalled that the Convention confers the Standing Committee functions related to the interpretation and application of the Convention. They are listed in Article 25 of the draft revised Convention and include the possibility to make recommendations to the Parties on the application of the Convention, examine question concerning the interpretation of the Convention and secure friendly settlement of any difficulty referred to it in the context of the conciliation procedure foreseen under Article 30 of the draft. It is acknowledged that, with regard to alleged violation of the Convention, the Standing Committee has until now had a purely advisory role, including in the conciliation procedure. This role of the Standing Committee seems still adequate in most cases, including in the case of alleged violations of the Convention by broadcasting services (Article 28). The Standing Committee shares however the viewpoint that it should be given an increased supervisory role with regard to possible measures against programmes in on-demand services (Article 29 of the draft) or against broadcasters who established themselves in the jurisdiction of another Party in order to circumvent the stricter rules, in the field covered by the Convention, of the Party to the territory of which their television broadcast is wholly or mostly directed (Article 33 of the draft). The Standing Committee notes that measures in the context of Articles 29 and 33 leave a larger margin of discretion to Parties, as compared to television broadcast (Article 28 of the draft). It underlines that the draft Convention now foresees to introduce a procedure whereby Parties will notify any measures they envisage to take on the basis of Articles 29 or 33 to the Standing Committee in view of an opinion and that they will refrain from taking them if the Standing Committee comes to the conclusion that the measures are incompatible with the Convention. In case of provisional and urgent measures foreseen under Article 29, paragraph 2, Parties will notify these measures to the Standing Committee in the shortest time possible and will urgently put an end to them if the Committee concludes that they are incompatible with the Convention.

    10.4 The transmission of on-demand audiovisual media services should be treated in a comparable way to television broadcast and should not be subjected to the more restrictive provisions taken from the AVMS Directive of the European Union

    The Standing Committee notes that, in the Convention (as in the corresponding European Union Directive), regulation of transfrontier aspects of on-demand services is less strict, offering more flexibility to the Parties with regard to the duties of service providers and protection of the viewer. The reason for this distinction (as explained in 72 of the draft explanatory report to the draft Convention) is the fact that the viewer has more control over on-demand programmes since the viewer chooses what to see and at which moment. On-demand television is also less invasive, it does not operate at a schedule decided by the media provider and lacks the immediacy and suggestive power of (live) broadcasts. The provisions of draft Article 29 have partly been aligned with the corresponding AVMS Directive (Article 2a.4) and allow Parties to take measures not only in case of violation of the convention but also of stricter national law. The measures referred to have to be notified to the Standing Committee with a view to a previous opinion and may not be taken or pursued (in the case of emergency procedures) if the Standing Committee comes to the conclusion that the measure is incompatible with the Convention.

    The general objective of this Convention, as defined in its draft Article 3, is to ensure freedom of expression and information via the free circulation of audiovisual media services which comply with the terms of the Convention. Although draft Article 29 gives a wide margin of discretion with regard to the restriction of on-demand audiovisual services from other state Parties, its paragraph 3 makes it clear that any measures which might be taken by the Parties under this Article must nevertheless comply with Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights. This implies that such measures respect the requirements laid down by the European Court of Human Rights to accept a restriction to freedom of expression and information. In this context, the proportionality requirement is particularly important and subject to careful examination. The draft Explanatory Report to the draft Convention gives further guidance on this issue (437).

    For European Union member states and for transfrontier providers compatibility of the Convention with the Audiovisual Media Services Directive is of paramount importance. In order to ensure the necessary coherence and to avoid inconsistency between these instruments, the terms employed (Article 2) and provisions on issues of common concern have been aligned with the AVMS Directive. This is also the case of this provision. Alignment has been realised to the extent possible taking into account the difference in nature between both instruments as well as the common interest of all the Parties, whether European Union and non-European Union member states, to the Convention.

    10.5 Guidance should be provided regarding the requirement of programme services of broadcasters being “wholly or mostly” directed towards the territory of a Party with the intention of circumventing the national laws of that Party

    The Standing Committee is of the opinion that the guidance provided in the draft explanatory report to the draft Convention meets the needs of the Parties on this question (see in particular 455 to 470). The report states that “The assessment of whether a television broadcast is wholly or mostly directed at the territory of another Party should be made on a case-by-case basis. Significant indicators might include the main language of the service, the origin of the television advertising or subscription revenues, and the existence of programmes or commercial communications targeted specifically at the public in the other Party.”

    10.6 Procedural safeguards, such as a prior opinion from the Standing Committee or arbitration, should be required before a Party can take measures directed against a broadcaster established abroad for having allegedly circumvented the receiving Party’s national laws, as far as such measures restrict the right to freedom of information through audiovisual media services

    The Standing Committee supports this recommendation and observes that the draft Convention now foresees to introduce in its draft Article 33 a procedure whereby Parties will refrain from taking such measures without a previous opinion by the Standing Committee. Reference is furthermore made to the comments on Recommendation 10.3 above.


1 Reference is made to CAHDI’s report of 27 October 2008 “on the consequences of the so-called “disconnection clause” in international law in general and for Council of Europe conventions, containing such a clause, in particular”(Doc CM(2008)164