Please select Recommendations and/or countries from the drop-down list on the right side.

Back Jalkautuva Museo – “the museum goes into the village”

Jalkautuva Museo – “the museum goes  into the village”

Location of the initiative:

FINLAND


Relation to Strategy 21 Recommendations:

S2 - Make heritage more accessible


Time span of the initiative:

Start Date: 1.8.2018 / End Date: 28.2.2019


Motivation / Methodology

The Municipality of Sastamala is geographically very wide (1 532 km2) and has dozens of villages. These villages and local societies each have their own unique history and cultural heritage. The museum of Sastamala is located in the city centre which means that the distance to villages can be long – sometimes over 40 kilometres.

In our initiative, we have increased the participation of villagers in cultural heritage matters. The main goal of our museum’s project was to bring the museum closer to the public. We were trying to reach out to the people who at present are not the main users of museum services. The Project’s name “Jalkautuva museo” freely translated means “The Museum goes into the village”. In other words, we are bringing the museum and its services into the local societies and villages.

Through our initiative, we wanted to increase the co-partnership of the public. In our pilot project we were searching for new ways of encouraging people to collect and value their mutual heritage – especially intangible cultural heritage - and make it visible.


Obstacles / Barriers

The participation of the public on collection work can be challenging for a museum because it often requires a lot of resources – mostly time. We focused on the audience’s point of view and kept the Village Partner model separate from our museum collection. Making cultural heritage visible and more accessible was the main idea in our project.

Activating people to digitalise material was also a challenge. The lack of devices and know-how on technical matters was an obstacle that we faced in the field.


Change / Impact

In our initiative/project we developed a new practice - Village Partner Model - which is now used regularly as part of the museum’s public engagement work. The focus of the model is on participation and the aim is to activate the public to get involved and increase interest in heritage work. The Museum provides tools and expertise for collecting and sharing mutual cultural heritage.

The cooperation with the village partners and the museum starts by choosing a specific theme or topic. It is important that the subject or the theme is generated by the villagers: “What do we want to preserve for future generations? Are there endangered local traditions that need to be saved?”.

Participation and local expertise. In our pilot project we worked in a small village, Keikyä, which is known for its handicraftsmen. Active villagers and the local museum of Keikyä started to collect and research the subject, together with museum professionals. We focused on one specific subject – a horn comb. The initiative for this specific subject arose from the village. In the 19th century and the first half of 20th century, there were several workshops in Keikyä which specialized in manufacturing combs. We organised “memory nights” in the local library where people could come and share their information and memories, or bring some pictures and digitalise them. Village partners had a crucial role when creating a network of local experts in the village. The museum worker gathered the information and helped with the scanning of old photographs. The scanned photos were presented for a wider audience via the web archive: www.sastamala.topoteekki.fi.

Bringing people together. Of great importance in our pilot project was the fact that the village partners provided cultural heritage information especially for children. During the project, the museum and village partners made a “suitcase exhibition” for schools. The exhibition presented comb manufacturing and local handicraft traditions in the form of pictures, texts, artefacts and assignments. The project brought people together and also increased the cooperation between cultural organisations: the Museum of Sastamala, Sastamala’s villages association, cultural services of Sastamala and the library, Sastamala Community College and the Pirkanmaa Provincial Museum.

New ways of presenting history. Our village Partner in Keikyä had experience and knowledge on theatre. This made it possible to make a dramatisation called the Tale of the Horn Comb. The dramatisation was filmed by students from Voionmaa Institute’s audio-visual studies.


Lessons learned

Working with a so-called hard-to-reach audience and enabling the public to get involved in cultural heritage work demands significant input from the museum’s personnel. In our pilot project, we were trying to reach people who were not our average visitors. This meant that networking, communication and working with the audience had to be re-considered, in order to be able to genuinely offer a possibility for wider participation.

During the project, it became obvious that this kind of participatory work was something that the public had wanted from the museum. Villagers were eager to participate and do voluntary work to preserve local heritage that they regard important. By using the Village Partner Model, museums can bring professional museum work and volunteer work closer together and offer an opportunity for the public to influence what kind of topics and themes are preserved for the future.


Online resources

www.sastamala.topoteekki.fi


Contact information

Marja Hänninen-Tolvi
The Foundation of Finnish Book Institute / Museum of Sastamala
[email protected]
www.pukstaavi.fi


Source of financing

Financing details
€ 15 000 grant from The Finnish Heritage Agency

Total cost
€ 17 107 inc. personnel, travelling, materials, other costs

Filter by
Components
1. THE ”SOCIAL COMPONENT” (S)
S1
S10
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
2. THE “TERRITORIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT” COMPONENT (D)
D1
D10
D11
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7
D8
D9
3. THE “KNOWLEDGE AND EDUCATION COMPONENT” (K)
K1
K10
K11
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
K7
K8
K9
Countries and International Organisations
Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Europe
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Holy See
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Moldova
Romania
San Marino
Serbia
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
Ukraine
Unesco
United Kingdom
Reset Filter

The golden collection of good practices