Evaluation reports

Click on the country of your choice to access country reports.

The following types of country reports may be found:

Mutual evaluation report

Third round evaluation report: This report provides a summary of the AML/CFT measures in place in the country as at the date of the on-site visit or immediately thereafter. It describes and analyses these measures, and provides recommendations on how certain aspects of the systems could be strengthened. It also sets out the country’s levels of compliance with each of the FATF 40+9 Recommendations. Mutual evaluation reports are subject to peer review.

Publication of the summary generally occurs immediately following the Plenary in which the report was examined and adopted, and publication of the full report occurs no later than 1 month after its adoption (previously, until December 2008, within 3 months from its adoption.

First and second round evaluation reports: Reports adopted under these rounds remain confidential. Only the summary of the report is public.

Progress report

Under the third evaluation round, all countries are required to provide a progress report 12 months after the adoption of their mutual evaluation report, based on a questionnaire prepared by the Secretariat. Such reports are subject to routine updates every two years between evaluation rounds.

The report will contain a general overview of the current situation and the developments since the last evaluation relevant in the AML/CFT field, an update on improvements which have been made in respect of the FATF core Recommendations (Recommendations 1, 5, 10, 13; Special Recommendations II and IV), an update on improvements which have been made in respect of those other FATF Recommendations which were rated either non-compliant or partially compliant in the mutual evaluation report; specific questions related to the Third European Union Directive (2005/60/EC) and the Implementation Directive (2006/70/EC) and updated statistical data. In March 2010, the Committee modified its rules of procedure which now provide for a written analysis of progress against the core Recommendations.

Progress reports are subject to peer review. If the Plenary is satisfied with the information provided and the progress undertaken, the progress report submitted by the country and the analysis of the progress on the core recommendations are adopted. Publication occurs immediately following the Plenary in which the report was examined and adopted.

Compliance report

Countries may be required to submit a compliance report or regular compliance reports :
a) in the context of action taken by MONEYVAL in respect of countries subject to its evaluation procedures which fail to implement the reference documents or the recommendations in the mutual evaluation report (Step I of the Compliance Enhancing Procedures) and
b) in cases where the examination of a progress report raises significant concerns about the extent of or speed of progress overall to rectify deficiencies identified in the mutual evaluation report (paragraph 42 of the Rules of Procedure).
Such reports are analysed in writing by the Secretariat and subject to Plenary peer review and adoption. Publication occurs following the Plenary in which the report was examined.

States subject to evaluation processes and procedures of MONEYVAL

Albania	Georgia	Montenegro
Andorra	Hungary	Poland
Armenia	Holy See (since April 2011)	Romania
Azerbaijan	Israel (since January 2006)	Russian Federation (also FATF member since 2003)
Bosnia and Herzegovina	Latvia	San Marino
Bulgaria	Liechtenstein	Serbia
Croatia	Lithuania	Slovak Republic
Cyprus	Malta	Slovenia
Czech Republic	Moldova	“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Estonia	Monaco	Ukraine