Appellant

Subject

747/2024

M.-L. L.

The appellant is a former Council of Europe staff member in grade B2 who had been employed since 2002 under various types of contracts and in various departments of the Organisation. The appellant's last appointment ended on 31 January 2024 at the end of her probationary period on the ground that her performance was not satisfactory.

The appellant challenges the decision not to confirm her in her employment at the end of the probationary period. In support of her appeal, she alleges that the evaluation procedure followed in her case was flawed and deficient, that the opinion of the Appointments Review Committee on which the contested decision is based was biased and that the Secretary General failed in her duty of care. 

She seeks the annulment of the contested decision and her reinstatement in the Organisation or, failing that, financial compensation for the damage suffered.

746/2024

A. S. T.

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision by which the Secretary General rejects any liability on the part of the Council of Europe in connection with the decision of the French tax authorities to make the pension paid to her by the Organisation subject to certain social security contributions.

In support of her appeal, the appellant claims that the Organisation failed in its duties and infringed the Council of Europe's internal law. She complains that the Organisation deprived her of the practical possibility of choosing between affiliation to the French social security system and the Organisation's medical scheme. The appellant claims further that the Organisation failed to fulfil its duty to inform and its duty of care. She considers that, in application of these general principles, the Organisation should have informed her of the economic consequences of her choices and of the cost of joining the French social security system in view of the social security contributions to be paid.

The appellant asks the Tribunal to order the Organisation to make good the damage she suffered by reimbursing her for the three years' arrears of social security contributions which the French tax authorities have charged to her.

745/2024

Z. G.

The appellant is a staff member of the Organisation under an open-ended contract.
She seeks the annulment of the Secretary General's decision to appoint her to grade A1 step 3 rather than A2 following an internal recruitment procedure. She challenges the Administration's practice of taking into account only years of professional experience within the Council of Europe at grades B5 and B6 in the calculation of the required six years of experience equivalent to grade A for an appointment at grade A2, in application of Article 340.4 of the Staff Rule on classification of jobs and Article 440.2 of the Staff Rule on entry into service. The appellant also complains that her previous experience outside the Organisation following the completion of her first degree was not considered.
The appellant describes this practice as arbitrary and discriminatory for the Organisation's staff members vis-à-vis external candidates. In her view, it has no legal basis in the Staff Regulations and Rules and creates inequality of treatment between candidates.

744/2024

I. S. V.

The appellant is an A2-grade staff member under an open-ended contract who had been previously employed by the Organisation under fixed-term contracts on a non-continuous basis. She seeks the annulment of the decision not to promote her to grade A3 on the ground that Administration erred in finding that she did not fulfil the six years of service for eligibility for such a promotion. She contests the Administration’s interpretation of the relevant rules (Article 24, paragraph 4, of Appendix II of the former Staff Regulations in force until 31 December 2022 and Article 540.1 of the Staff Rule on career development in force since 1 January 2023) according to which periods of service with the Organisation preceding an interruption of employment are not taken into account. The appellant considers that the rules in question do not support such an interpretation.

743/2024

B. S. v. Governor

The appellant is a staff member of the Council of Europe Development Bank employed under successive fixed-term contracts since 2015.

He is seeking the annulment of the Governor's decision to terminate his employment when his current contract expires on 30 April 2024. He requests, primarily, that his contractual relationship with the Bank be requalified in an indefinite-term contract or, alternatively, that his current contract be converted into an indefinite-term contract. He is also seeking compensation for the damage he has suffered.

The appellant claims that his employment should be maintained insofar as the contracts awarded to him have not complied with the applicable provisions of the Staff Regulations concerning the maximum duration statutorily fixed for contracts. According to the appellant, the Development Bank cannot consider his appeal inadmissible on the ground that it was out of time, since only the decision to terminate his employment at the end of its term met the criteria for a challengeable administrative act. The appellant also claims that the refusal to convert his current contract into an open-ended one is not supported by a sufficient motivation as to the skills he would have lacked to obtain such a conversion. Lastly, the appellant argues that in the reasons given for refusing this conversion, the Bank wrongly applies a condition, that of very good performance, which is no longer required by the rules in force.

742/2023

I. S.

The appellant is a former staff member of Russian nationality who had been employed under fixed-term contracts since 2014.

She seeks the annulment of the Secretary General's decision not to renew her contract following the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation and not to convert her fixed-term contract into an open-ended contract. She also seeks compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. 

The appellant claims that the decision in question has no legal basis, is discriminatory with regard to nationality and type of contract and in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the right to respect for private and family life, as well as of the Secretary General's duty to protect all employees of the Organisation without any distinction.

741/2023

E. K.

The appellant is a permanent staff member of the Council of Europe with a dual French and Russian citizenship. The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to remove her from an A4 job and to transfer her to a job of a lower grade in pursuance of Articles 570.1 (Transfer without competition) and 590.1 (Supernumerary transfer) of the Staff Regulations within the framework of a risk management exercise aimed at identifying sensitive jobs following the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation. The appellant also seeks compensation for damages resulting from the contested decision.

The appellant claims that the decision in question is arbitrary, discriminatory and that it contravenes the Staff Regulations and Rules. The decision would also result in a breach of Articles 8 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as of the general principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, legal certainty and good administration. The appellant further submits that her assignment to a lower-grade job constitutes a disguised measure of downgrading and a case of psychological harassment.

740/2023

D. K.

The appellant is a permanent staff member of the Council of Europe with a dual French and Russian citizenship. The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to remove him from an A4 job and to transfer him to a job of a lower grade in pursuance of Articles 570.1 (Transfer without competition) and 590.1 (Supernumerary transfer) of the Staff Regulations within the framework of a risk management exercise aimed at identifying sensitive jobs following the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation. The appellant also seeks compensation for damages resulting from the contested decision.

The appellant claims that the decision in question is arbitrary, discriminatory and that it contravenes the Staff Regulations and Rules. The decision would also result in a breach of Articles 8 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as of the general principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, legal certainty and good administration. The appellant further submits that his assignment to a lower-grade job constitutes a disguised measure of downgrading and a case of psychological harassment.

739/2023

E. T.

The appellant is a permanent staff member of the Council of Europe with a dual French and Russian citizenship. The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to remove her from an A4 job and to transfer her to a job of a lower grade in pursuance of Articles 570.1 (Transfer without competition) and 590.1 (Supernumerary transfer) of the Staff Regulations within the framework of a risk management exercise aimed at identifying sensitive jobs following the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation. The appellant also seeks compensation for damages resulting from the contested decision.

The appellant claims that the decision in question is arbitrary, discriminatory and that it contravenes the Staff Regulations and Rules. The decision would also result in a breach of Articles 8 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as of the general principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, legal certainty and good administration. The appellant further submits that her assignment to a lower-grade job constitutes a disguised measure of downgrading and a case of psychological harassment.

738/2023

C. A.

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General's decision to appoint them, following an internal recruitment procedure, to Grade A1 instead of Grade A2. The appellant challenges the Administration's practice of taking into account only the years of experience as a permanent staff member in grades B5 and B6 for the purposes of determining the grade on appointment, pursuant to Article 340.4 of the Staff Rule on classification of jobs and Article 440.2 of the Staff Rule on entry into service.

The appellant considers that this practice is arbitrary in that it does not take account of the responsibilities actually exercised by staff members. They further claim that the practice in question discriminates against external candidates and against staff members who have experience as temporary staff members in the Organisation.

G. T.

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General's decision to terminate their temporary contract on the ground of manifest unsuitability to perform their duties. This decision was taken following allegations of harassment for acts that the appellant had committed in the performance of their duties. 

The appellant submits that the procedure followed to terminate their contract without giving them a written warning did not comply with the applicable rules and, more generally, with the general principles of international civil service law, such as mutual trust, good faith, the duty of care and the right to be heard. The appellant also claims that, by deciding not to initiate disciplinary proceedings in respect of the acts of which they were accused, the Administration infringed their rights of defence. The appellant further claims that the decision to terminate their contract prematurely was manifestly disproportionate and insufficiently reasoned.

A. A.

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to accept their application in an external recruitment procedure (vacancy notice e7/2023 - Director of filtering and support services of the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights, Grade A6) on the ground that the application did not meet the requirements of the vacancy notice as regards diploma, professional experience and language knowledge.

The appellant considers that this decision is contrary to the provisions of the Staff Regulations and to fundamental principles of law, such as the principle of equal treatment, the principle of good administration and the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. The appellant further submits that the Secretary General erred in her assessment of the facts and misused her discretion.

R. K.

The appellant is a former local staff member employed by the Organisation under a fixed-term contract (CDD). Having lodged a complaint with the Commission against Harassment, the appellant challenged the Deputy Secretary General's decision to support the Commission's opinion concluding that there had been no harassment in their case, on the grounds that the Commission had not been impartial in its investigation and that its recommendations were prejudicial to them.

Paolo LOBBA

The appellant is a staff member who entered into a fixed-term contract with the Council of Europe as of 1 September 2022 following his successful participation in competition No e22/2021 for the recruitment of Legal Analysts/Legal Advisors (grade A1/A2). He had previously been employed by the Organisation as an assistant lawyer (grade B3) under a fixed-term contract as of 1 September 2019. At the time of the conclusion of his second contract, the appellant was on parental leave and had relocated to a country other than the country of his duty station. 

The appellant claims that by determining that his place of recruitment for the purpose of his second contract coincided with his duty station under his first contract, the Organisation failed to consider the factual establishment of his residence outside the duty country, and therefore committed an error of law and fact.

He challenges the decision taken on the basis of this determination not to grant him the installation allowance and not to reimburse his travel and removal expenses upon taking up his new duties.

He also challenges the decision to take into account the periods of his service since 2019, including the period spent on parental leave, for the calculation of the progressive reduction of the expatriation and basic family allowances.

Zhargal BUDAEV

The appellant is a Russian national who was employed until 31 August 2022 on a fixed-term contract as an assistant lawyer at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights. She seeks the annulment of the decision not to renew her contract upon its expiry alleging that the contested decision has no valid grounds and discriminates her owing to her nationality.

Daria CHISTIAKOVA

The appellant is a Russian national who was employed until 31 August 2022 on a fixed-term contract as an assistant lawyer at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights. She seeks the annulment of the decision not to renew her contract upon its expiry alleging that the contested decision has no valid grounds and discriminates her owing to her nationality.

Anna GORODETSKAYA

The appellant is a Russian national who was employed until 31 August 2022 on a fixed-term contract as an assistant lawyer at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights.
She seeks the annulment of the decision not to renew her contract upon its expiry alleging that the contested decision has no valid grounds. The appellant also claims that the contested decision discriminates her on the ground of her nationality and of the type of contract she held.

Olivia CONRAD (III)

The appellant is a staff member of the Organisation who applied for external competition No. e11/2022 for the recruitment of communication/media officers. She seeks the annulment of the Administration's decision not to invite her to the next stage of the selection procedure because of her results in the written test. She claims that there were irregularities in the competition conditions linked to the testing platform and argues that the selection procedure was neither transparent nor fair.

Emiliya RAMAZANOVA

The appellant is a national of Russia and Azerbaijan who is employed as an assistant lawyer at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights. She seeks the annulment of the decision not to place her name on the reserve list which was drawn up following completion of the procedure under vacancy notice No. e22/2021 for the recruitment of Legal Analysts/Legal Advisors (Grade A1/A2). She claims that, as a candidate to this procedure, she was discriminated owing to the unjustifiable requirements that the Administration imposed upon her relating to her nationality.

C (II) v. Governor

The appellant contests the decision of the Council of Europe Development Bank by which the Bank allegedly refused to communicate the calculation of his/her days of leave. The appellant alleges that the author of the contested decision was not competent to adopt it and that the decision in question does not comply with the principle of sound administration.

Lars NYCTELIUS (III)

The appellants seek the annulment of the decision, reflected in their January 2022 pay statement, to partially apply the 2022 salary adjustment in application of the affordability clause in the salary adjustment method. They also challenge the decision of the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of this clause to the 2022 salary adjustment.

Penelope DENU (V)

Joanne HUNTING (II)

Tanja KLEINSORGE (II)

Natalia ZAYTSEVA

The appellant is a Russian national who was employed until 31 May 2022 on a fixed-term contract. She seeks the annulment of the decision not to renew her contract upon its expiry, as well as the decision rejecting her prior request for an unpaid leave. By her appeal, she contends that the Organization violated the duty of care, discriminated her on account of her nationality, and she challenges the alleged inconsistency of the Council of Europe contractual policy.

Olga OREKHOVA

The appellant is a Russian national who was employed until 31 August 2022 on a fixed-term contract as an assistant lawyer at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights. She seeks the annulment of the decision not to renew her contract upon its expiry alleging that the contested decision is unlawful, arbitrary and discriminatory.

Elena IZYUMENKO

The appellant is a French-Russian national who was employed until 31 August 2022 on a fixed-term contract as an assistant lawyer at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights. The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to renew her contract upon its expiry alleging that the contested decision is unlawful, arbitrary and discriminatory. She also seeks compensation for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages suffered.

E

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to renew his/her secondment at the Council of Europe and compensation for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages suffered.

Dmitry GURIN

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision terminating his application to an external vacancy on the ground of ineligibility following the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation to the Council of Europe.

Fatih KIRBAS

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to invite him to an interview as part of an external recruitment procedure.

D

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to renew his/her contract.

Mourad ROUABAA (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Secretary General not to accept his application for the external competition e48/2020.

Paméla MENDEZ CARVALHO

The appellant challenges the decision to refuse the renewal of her contract.

C (I) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant contests the decision of the Governor of the Bank notifying her of the decision of the Invalidity Board, denouncing that the origin of her invalidity is attributable to the Administration due to a situation of moral harassment at work, and claims compensation for the damages suffered.

Irena Alicja KOWALCZYK-KEDZIORA

The appellant seeks the annulment of the administrative decision not to grant her the educational allowance for the university year 2020 for her son who is studying in a third country.

Laurence NECTOUX

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision to terminate her contract.

Irène WEIDMANN (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Secretary General by which the Organisation modified the scale of calculation of her pension.

Mourad ROUABAA (I)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Secretary General not to invite him to compete for the post of System Support Assistant. He also demands the reopening of the internal competition with written and oral examination.

Tanja KALOVSKA ROUSSOU

The appellant complaints of the discrimination as well as the non-inclusion in the follow-up project on promoting human rights and minorities protection in the South-East of Europe.

Maria OCHOA-LLIDO

The appellants request the annulment of the decision refusing them compensation for the entire injury resulting from acts of psychological harassment.

Vincente DALVY

Ilknur YUKSEK (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Secretary General dated 7 June 2019 not to place her name on the reserve list established after the following competition: Vacancy notice no. 17/2018 MONEYVAL, Programme Manager (A1/A2), due to an irregularity in the procedure concerned.

Timothy CARTWRIGHT

The appellant mainly seeks the annulment of the decision to implement the modification of Article 36 of Coordinated Pension Regulations (RRCP) recommended by 236th Report of CCR and the return of statu quo ante; in the alternative, they ask for compensation for prejudice corresponding to the loss of their pension rights.

Silvia MUÑOZ BOTELLA (II)

The appellant seeks to include in her salary, in the future, the salary rating of 1,1% calculated for 2018, after the payment of the arrears of the salary contribution by a Member State for the years 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Antonella CAGNOLATI

The appellants seek the annulment of the decision by the Secretary General to recover in 2020 the tax adjustment which had been paid in 2018.

Ulrich BOHNER (VII)

Yannick TROADEC

The appellants mainly seek the annulment of the decision to implement the modification of Article 36 of Coordinated Pension Regulations (RRCP) recommended by 236th Report of CCR and the return of statu quo ante; in the alternative, they ask for compensation for prejudice corresponding to the loss of their pension rights.

Morven TRAIN

Linette TAESCH

Ilda OLIVEIRA

Silvia MUÑOZ BOTELLA (I)

Anne-Marie KLEIN

Violette GRAS

Sabine EMERY

Penelope DENU (IV)

B

The appellant party seeks the annulment of a disciplinary measure.

Youlia LEVERTOVA v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant challenges her appraisal for 2018.

Nathalie VERNEAU (II)

The appellant mainly seeks the annulment of the decision to implement the modification of Article 36 of Coordinated Pension Regulations (RRCP) recommended by 236th Report of CCR and the return of statu quo ante; in the alternative, they ask for compensation for prejudice corresponding to the loss of their pension rights.

Hanno HARTIG (III)

The appellants seek the annulment of the decision by the Secretary General to implement in their respect the decision of the Committee of Ministers’ amending article 36 of Coordinated Pension Regulations

Melina BABOCSAY (VII)

Johannes de JONGE (III)

Riccardo PRIORE (II)

The appellant challenges the decision of the Secretary General refusing to grant him effective protection (article 2 of Rule 1292 on the protection of human dignity at the Council of Europe).

Ulrich BOHNER (VI)

The appellants seek the annulment of the decision by the Secretary General to implement in their respect the decision of the Committee of Ministers’ amending article 36 of Coordinated Pension Regulations

Simon PALMER

Bridget O'LOUGHLIN

Alfonso ZARDI (VI)

John PARSONS (V)

Isabela MIHALACHE (II)

The appellant contests the modalities of execution of the 30 October 2019 decision in appeal No. 604/2019.

Arman ZRVANDYAN

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Secretary General refusing his job application under vacancy notice o44/2019.

Stanislas FROSSARD

The appellants seek the application of the adjustments of salaries for the year 2018 after the payment of the arrears of the salary contribution by a member state.

Andrée Jeannine FRANCK

Alfonso ZARDI (V)

Lars NYCTELIUS (II)

Hanno HARTIG (II)

Günter SCHIRMER (II)

John PARSONS (IV)

Marc BAECHEL (IV)

Yann DE BUYER (II)

Melina BABOCSAY (VI)

Ulrich BOHNER (V)

A v. CCNR

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of the President of the Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine refusing to open an external investigation concerning allegations of mental harassment. The appellant also requests to suspend the implementation of the appointments made, according to that person, with the aim of removing the appellant from the Organisation.

James BRANNAN (IV)

The appellant seeks to annul the administrative decision announced on 22 July 2019 to amend the medical insurance scheme CEMSIS concerning children of 18 and 19 years old, and therefore depriving them of their full and free of charge coverage previously provided for in Article 9, paragraph 2, of Staff Regulations.

Jean-Michel MARTZ

The appellant seeks annulment of the decision to remove him from his post as a disciplinary measure.

Nigel SMITH

The appellant seeks annulment of the decision to refuse him a retroactive payment of the household allowance.

Michel BRECHENMACHER (II)

The appellant seeks annulment of the decision to remove him from his post as a disciplinary measure.

Merete BJERREGAARD

The appellant seeks the annulment of the administrative decision to refuse to grant the educational allowance and the reimbursement at “the exceptional rate” of educational costs foreseen for children with special educational needs for her son (Article 7, paragraph 6.d of Annexe IV of Staff Regulations and paragraph 5 of Rule 1277).

Ana GOREY (V)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the administrative decision to refuse to grant “the exceptional rate” of reimbursement of educational costs foreseen for children with special educational needs for her daughter and her son (Article 7, paragraph 6.d of Annexe IV of Staff Regulations and paragraph 5 of Rule 1277).

Ana GOREY (IV)

Barbara UBOWSKA (II)

The appellant challenges the pro rata basis system with regard to travelling time calculated for 2019 to return home in Poland.

Barbara UBOWSKA (I)

The appellant challenges the refusal to grant her a special leave for the purpose of moving house to Poland.

Magno LOURENCO AGOSTINHO

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision imposing him a new probationary period following a new contract for the same functions.

Ulrich BOHNER (IV)

The appellants seek the annulment of the decision of the Secretary General in execution of the Committee of Minister’s decision to freeze salary and pensions for 2019 not applying the annual salary and pension adjustment recommended by the Co-ordinating Committee on Remuneration (CCR).

An appellant (Appeal No. 607) also seeks the annulment of the decision to postpone by one year the introduction of the "moderation clause" in the method of salary and pensions adjustment.

Pierre MASSON (II)

Monique BECRET (VI)

Alessandro MANCINI

Yann DE BUYER

Johannes de JONGE (II)

Melina BABOCSAY (V)

Alfonso ZARDI (IV)

Gianfranco ALBERELLI (IV)

Céline COSSET

The appellant challenges the decision to refuse the renewal of her contract before the ending of the probationary period.

X

The appellant challenges the decision not to renew the appellant’s contract. The appellant also seeks compensation for damages.

Isabela MIHALACHE (I)

The appellant challenges the decision to refuse the renewal of her contract even though she was successful in a recruitment procedure for the same functions.

Maria Cristina ANA

The appellant challenges the decision not to grant her a higher grade and she requests the Tribunal to grant her that grade.

Claire SMITH v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant challenges the amount of the capital sum paid after the recognition of her disability.

Penelope DENU (III)

The appellants seek the annulment of the decision of the Secretary General in execution of the Committee of Minister’s decision not to award the annual salary and pension adjustment as from January 2018.

David PARROTT (II)

Ulrich BOHNER (III)

Alfonso ZARDI (III)

John PARSONS (III)

James BRANNAN (III)

Gianfranco ALBERELLI (III)

Matthias BAUER v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant challenges the decision of the Governor to impose him a reprimand as a disciplinary measure and to reorganize his duties.

Luca SCHIO v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant contests the decision of the Governor to confirm the opinions of his direct hierarchical superior on his appraisal.

Sibel DEMİR SALDIRIM (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of her written and oral examination for the selection of seconded lawyers in the Organisation.

Michel BRECHENMACHER (I)

The appellant seeks annulment of the decision to remove him from his post as a disciplinary measure.

Edo KORLJAN

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Deputy Secretary General to return him to the grade A3 he was occupying before his promotion to grade A4.

Victor SOLOVEYTCHIK

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of 20 December 2017 of the Directorate of Human Resources insofar as it determines that a pension transfer request submitted after a date fixed by HRD would be refused.

Jannick DEVAUX (III)

The appellant challenges the decision to refuse the renewal of her contract.

Jannick DEVAUX (II)

The appellant challenges the refusal of maintaining her remuneration.

Manuel PAOLILLO

The appellant challenges the decision rejecting his demand for compensation for acts of moral harassment.

Rona BROWN

The appellant challenges the amount of the capital sum paid after the recognition of her disability.

Pedro AGRAMUNT FONT de MORA

The appellant, President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, challenges the report No. 14338 of the Parliamentary Assembly.

Riccardo PRIORE (I)

The appellants challenge a decision of the Deputy Secretary General taken under Rule 1292 of 3 September 2010 on the protection of human dignity at the Council of Europe.

Régis BRILLAT (III)

Manuel Antonio de ALMEIDA PEREIRA

The appellant challenges the decision of the Director of Human Resources, denying him additional steps and he asks the Tribunal to grant him these steps.

Sibel DEMİR SALDIRIM (I)

Concerning the appointment to posts of seconded lawyers at the European Court of Human Rights. They request that their competencies be recognised and they demand the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to appoint the four successful candidates.

Zeki UYSAL

Monique BECRET

The appellant requests the annulment of the provisions of Rule No. 1387, modifying CEMSIS insurance medical coverage.

Nezih DUSKUNKORUR

The appellant requests the annulment of the provisions of Rule No. 1387, modifying CEMSIS insurance medical coverage.

Schnutz Rudolf DÜRR

The appellant requests the annulment of the provisions of Rules No. 1384 and 1385 and of Rule No. 1387, modifying CEMSIS insurance medical coverage.

Rüdiger DOSSOW

The appellant requests the annulment of the provisions of Rule No. 1387, modifying CEMSIS insurance medical coverage.

Aiste RAMANAUSKAITE

The appellant requests the annulment of the provisions of Rule No. 1387, modifying CEMSIS insurance medical coverage.

Tanja KLEINSORGE

The appellant requests the annulment of the provisions of Rule No. 1387, modifying CEMSIS insurance medical coverage.

Günter SCHIRMER

The appellant requests the annulment of the provisions of Rules No. 1384 and 1385 and of Rule No. 1387, modifying CEMSIS insurance medical coverage.

James BRANNAN

The appellant requests the annulment of the provisions of Rules No. 1384 and 1385 and of Rule No. 1387, modifying CEMSIS insurance medical coverage.

Susan CROSS

The appellant challenges the Secretary General’s decision not to maintain the payment of the allowance in respect of dependent children and the education allowance during the period of unpaid leave.

Natalia KRAVCHENKO (II)

The appellant, a former temporary staff member, challenges the Secretary General’s decision to reject her request for protection and assistance in her action before the Directorate of Human Resources and in her judicial proceedings against the “Bas-Rhin sickness insurance fund (Caisse Primaire d’Assurance Maladie du Bas-Rhin)” about an invalidity pension following an accident at work reported by the Directorate of Human Resources.

Raphaël ALOMAR v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

Retiring Governor of the Bank, the appellant demands the annulment of the Governor’s decision to exclude him from the Consultative Committee of the Autonomous Pension Fund.

Costas SKOURAS

The appellant complains about the Secretary General’s decision not to renew his contract.

Holger SEIFERT v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant contests a new hierarchical junction and a diminution of responsibilities. He also complains about moral harassment.

Maria-Lucia ORISTANIO (II) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant contests the decision of the Government to reorganize the Bank. She assumes that this decision deteriorates further her working conditions as it is continuing the downgrading, the moral harassment and the disguised disciplinary measure already brought to the attention of the Tribunal in appeal N° 559/2014.

Gyorgyi KACSANDI (IV) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant challenges the Governor’s decision to refuse her a permanent contract at the end of her probationary period.

Gyorgyi KACSANDI (III) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant complains about psychological harassment and unequal treatment.

Gyorgyi KACSANDI (II) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant requests the annulment of the decision to terminate her fixed term contract.

Gyorgyi KACSANDI (I) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant challenges her 30th month appraisal.

Nataliya YAKIMOVA

The appellant is complaining about the Secretary General’s refusal to effect advancement in step after 24 months of service (article 3 of Appendix IV to the Staff Regulations). She also challenges the exclusion of probationary period from the term of service in the calculations for the purposes of advances of steps.

Maria-Lucia ORISTANIO (I) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant is complaining of a deterioration of her working conditions, a downgrading, a moral harassment and a disguised disciplinary measure under the guise of a reorganization. She also contests the refusal of her demand to be reestablished in the integrality of her duties.

Martine CARALY-STARKE

The appellant asks that the accident she sustained should be regarded as an accident at work.

Gunilla HEDMAN

The appellant seeks for revision of Rule No. 1364 of 28 January 2014 on contributions towards collective insurance premiums and the restoring of the base provided for in Rule No. 1325.

Fabrice KELLENS

The appellant challenges the recruitment procedure following vacancy notice No. e257/2013 as well as the subsequent decisions including the appointment of another candidate.

Geneviève MAYER

The appellant challenges the recruitment procedure following vacancy notice No. e257/2013 as well as the subsequent decisions including the appointment of another candidate.

Viaceslav PETRASHENKO

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to appoint him to a position of lawyer at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights and not to put him on the reserve list further to an external recruitment competition.

Anne GURY

The appellants seek the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reject theirs applications for the competition n° e059/2013. They also allege that the Human Resources Directorate would have provided them with wrong information concerning the possibility of taking out an unemployment insurance.

Martine LANG

Nasera KESSOUR

Marie-Paule GUTFREUND

Sevda GÜNDÜZ

Clelia CUCCHETTI-RONDANINI

Monique BECRET (IV)

The appellant contests the decision to refuse the early retirement measures.

Jannick DEVAUX

The appellant challenges the calculation method of her benefits to purchase her pension entitlement.

Cynera JAFFREY

The appellant challenges the civil liability of Council of Europe for the accident at work she had on the 21 November 2012.

Carlo TANCREDI (II)

The appellant contests the decision refusing a new classification of his grade.

Bilge KURT TORUN

The appellant contests the decision informing her that she was excluded from the special procedure under article 24.e of the Regulations on Appointments following the ability tests.

Carlo TANCREDI

The appellant contests the decision to refuse to renew his fixed-term contract following the New Staff Policy.

Giovanni PALMIERI (VIII)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to refuse to apply to him article 24, paragraph 2 of the Staff Regulations to let him end his term as President of the Staff Committee (30 June 2015).

Staff Committee (XIV)

The appellant seeks the cancellation of the A.P. decision 6186 concerning inter alia the granting of steps to a staff member.

Merita ANDREA

The appellant contests her appraisal.

Dorota LELONEK v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The applicant seeks the annulment of the Governor’s decision not to pay her a survivor’s pension.

STAFF COMMITTEE (XIII)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the consultation of the Staff Committee by the Administration dated 7 November 2012 on the use of the Vanbreda account and its replacement by a consultation in accordance with the general principles of law and the statutory and regulatory provisions.

STAFF COMMITTEE (XII)

The appellant seeks the cancellation of the deductions carried out with respect to the August 2012 pay slips for certain staff members who took part in the “work stoppage” organized by the Staff Committee on 19 June 2012.

Michel SEMERTZIDIS (II) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant seeks annulment of the decision to remove him from his post as a disciplinary measure.

Mimoza MURATI

The appellant (a project manager with a consulting contract) seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to extend her contract.

Ellen Joanne PENNINCKX

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to pay her the expatriation allowance and all related payments.

Joan STAFFORD

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to proceed to the immediate destruction of confidential information concerning her which could illegally be found in files other than administrative files.

Alfonso ZARDI (II)

The appellant contests the modalities of execution of the 8 December 2011 decision in appeal N° 475/2011.

Françoise PRINZ (II)

The appellant contests the modalities of execution of the 8 December 2011 decision in appeal N° 474/2011.

Nelly ROUGIE-EICHLER

The appellant seeks the recognition of the Council of Europe responsibility in relation of the damage the appellant believes having suffered.

R. V. (III) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant seeks annulment of the decision not to consider him as invalid.

Alev GUNYAKTI

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in her grade as from 1st January 2012, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Ivana d'ALESSANDRO

The appellant requests the replacement of a fixed term contract with an indefinite duration contract following the vacancy of the post corresponding to the duties which are effectively exercised.

STAFF COMMITTEE (XI)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to award staff members (or former staff members) with a disability an exceptional home adaptation grant without respecting former engagements taken with the Staff Committee.

Laurent LINTERMANS (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to refuse to qualify as industrial disease the disability for his recognition as an invalid.

Laurent LINTERMANS (I)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to refuse to qualify as industrial disease the disability for his recognition as an invalid.

Tilman HOPPE

The appellant contests the tests results of his online test for a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e104/2011).

R. V. (II) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant seeks annulment of the decision to remove him/her from his post as a disciplinary measure.

Elisabeth SCARAVELLA

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st October 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

James BRANNAN

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st October 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Nadine SCHAEFFER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st October 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Marie-Odile BILLET

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st October 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Daniela BALESTRA

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st October 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Didier FAUCHEZ

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st October 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Roza MUSTAFAYEVA

The appellant contests her appraisal for 2003.

D. M. v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant seeks compensation for damage suffered as a result of moral harassment, discrimination and racist abuses.

Emmanuel SIMONET

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st July 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Nicholas FOURCHER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st July 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Marc BIGAIGNON (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st July 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

J. de la P. L. (II) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant contests the Governor’s decision to end his/her contractual engagement.

Richard WIEDER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st July 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Gemma FRY

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st July 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Sylviane POIRIER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st July 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Christophe STOLL

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st July 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Anne AMAR

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st July 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Ana GOREY (III)

The appellant seeks the annulment of Rule No. 1329 on the education allowance and of the Secretary General’s decision not to accord her the exceptional rate of reimbursement of educational costs.

Ayşe Gül ALKIŞ

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to her, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

Michel SEMERTZIDIS v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant requests the annulment of his downgrading as a disciplinary measure.

Emanuele NICOSIA

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to him, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

Marina MAKAROVA

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to her, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

Ekaterina PRIKHODKO

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to her, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

Barry TULETT

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st April 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Emin ATAC

LThe appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st April 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

David Michel PARROTT

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st April 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Françoise DEGENS

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st April 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Robert DIEBOLD (III)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award him the following step in grade as from 1st April 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Katia BARON

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to award her the following step in grade as from 1st April 2011, as well as the decision to double the period for awarding steps in future.

Sergey GUSEVSKIY

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to him, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

Olivia CONRAD

The appellant contests the regularity of an external recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e64/2011).

Senem GUROL

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to her, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

Mesut BEDIRHANOGLU

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to him, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

Natasha BAKIRCI

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to her, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

Ûmit KILINÇ

The appellant alleges some irregularities in the ability tests, which, according to him, are part of the written tests of a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e25/2010).

J. de la P. L. v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant contests his appraisal.

Jonathan Landon SHARPE (IV)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reduce salary and pension scales of a sum corresponding to 0,2% of the scale.

Mélina BABOCSAY (IV)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reduce salary and pension scales of a sum corresponding to 0,2% of the scale.

Brian O'REILLY

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reduce salary and pension scales of a sum corresponding to 0,2% of the scale.

Veronica JEANNIN (V)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reduce salary and pension scales of a sum corresponding to 0,2% of the scale.

Maria Isabel CASTRO MARTINEZ

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reduce salary and pension scales of a sum corresponding to 0,2% of the scale.

Pascale BOUILLON (VII)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reduce salary and pension scales of a sum corresponding to 0,2% of the scale.

Carol KENDALL

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reduce salary and pension scales of a sum corresponding to 0,2% of the scale.

Maria Rosa PREVOST

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reduce salary and pension scales of a sum corresponding to 0,2% of the scale.

Jayne YEO

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of 15 November 2010, which considers that she had resigned.

Alfonso ZARDI

The appellant seeks the annulment of recruitment procedure e46/2010 and, as a result, the subsequent decisions including the appointment of another candidate.

Françoise PRINZ

The appellant seeks the annulment of recruitment procedure e46/2010 and, as a result, the subsequent decisions including the appointment of another candidate.

Seda PUMPYANSKAYA (III)

The appellant seeks the annulment of a decision about her contract and compensation for damages.

Franceline DENTINGER

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reject her request for an education allowance.

Judith BUTLER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision to initiate for her benefit an individual performance-enhancement process.

R.V. v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant seeks annulment of the Bank’s decision to reject his request for protection in his official capacity and the granting of such a protection.

Seda PUMPYANSKAYA (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of a decision about her contract and compensation for damages.

Pierre DEFER

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reject his request for an education allowance.

Seda PUMPYANSKAYA (I)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the appraisal for 2009.

Natalia KRAVCHENKO

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision not to give her a temporary contract after the 30th of June 2010.

Virginia PALMIERI

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to pay her an orphan’s pension.

Giovanni PALMIERI (VII)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to pay him the allowance in respect of dependent children.

Jean-Marc LIBS

The appellant, a permanent staff member of grade B4 fulfilling a fixed-term position, seeks the annulment of the decision of the Directorate of Human Resources excluding him from taking part in an internal competition for a post of grade B3 (vacancy notice n° 67/2009).

Tobia FIORILLI

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to pay him the expatriation allowance.

Elnara RAMAZANOVA

The appellant contests the result of her interview in a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e94/2008).

Levent ERCAN

The appellant contests the result of his interview in a recruitment procedure (vacancy notice n° e37/2008).

Renate ZIKMUND (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the implicit decision of refusal to grant her protection in her official capacity (Article 40 of Staff Regulations).

Petra WINTER

The appellant contests the mark given for a paper in an external recruitment procedure. She seeks re-evaluation of the paper and the evaluation of other papers.

Natasha PACE ABU-GHOSH (II)

The appellant contests the mark given for a paper in an external recruitment procedure.

Sergey GOLUBOK

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to invite him to participate in the written examination for the competition e42/2008 for a fixed-term position: Russian lawyer in the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights (grade A1/A2/A3).

Przemysław MUSIAŁKOWSKI

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to invite him for an interview under the competition e84/2007 for the recruitment of administrative officers open to nationals of Council of Europe member States (grade A1/A2).

Annachiara CERRI

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Pierre MASSON

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Jean-Pierre GEILLER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Olivia CONRAD

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Estelle STEINER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Günter NAGEL

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Ana GOREY (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Lucie MISSEMER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Florence MANSONS

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Wolfgang LARCHER

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Elisabeth SCARAVELLA

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Françoise MALLET

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Karl-Friedrich BOPP

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Marose BALA LEUNG

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Ilina TANEVA

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Joanne HUNTING

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

John Bryan WILSON

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Karla CHARRETON (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Veronica JEANNIN (IV)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Martine SCHANDENE

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

François KOLB

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Didier FAUCHEZ

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Yolande ANTOINE

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Jeanne GRUBER-THIRION

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Kheyra MOKEDDEM

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Gianfranco ALBERELLI (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Elisabeth HEURTEBISE (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Jean-Philippe RESTOUEIX

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Marc BAECHEL (III)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Pascale BOUILLON (VI)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Halvor LERVIK (IV)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Jonathan Landon SHARPE

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Mikaël POUTIERS

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Mélina BABOCSAY (III)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Giovanni PALMIERI (VI)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Régis BRILLAT (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Nicholas BROWN

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Penelope DENU (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to rectify the salary and pension scales, in accordance with the salary adjustment method following the correction of the french component of the basket of salaries used to calculate the coordinated scales for 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Inga ŠVARCA

The appellant contests the mark given for a paper in an external recruitment procedure. She seeks re-evaluation of the paper and the evaluation of two other papers.

Maria ORESHKINA

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to invite her to participate in the written examination for the competition e84/2007 for the recruitment of administrative officers open to nationals of Council of Europe member States (grade A1/A2).

Renate ZIKMUND (I)

The appellant seeks the annulment of decision A.P. 4277 of the Secretary General to second her temporarily to another Department.

Nathalie VERNEAU

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to exclude her application to take part in the competition e84/2007 in which she took part on a provisional basis.

Loredana TASSONE

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to exclude her application to take part in the competition e84/2007 in which she took part on a provisional basis.

Laura TOMASI

The appellant seeks annulment of the decisions by the Secretary General and the Appointments Board to exclude her application to take part in competition e84/2007. She requests the Appointments Board to mark the written papers she drew up during the aforementioned competition in which she took part on a provisional basis.

Irène WEIDMANN

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General decision to keep her post at B3 grade and not to take into account of the circumstances in favour of the upgrading of the post in B5 or A2.

Lilit NIKOGHOSYAN

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General decision to exclude her application to take part in the competition e84/2007 for the recruitment of administrative officers open to nationals of Council of Europe member States (grade A1/A2).

Natasha PACE ABU-GHOSH (I)

The appellant asks the Secretary General to be allowed to participate in an oral interview in the event that she is successful in the written element of competition e84/2007. The appellant had taken part to the written examination on a provisional basis.

Franck KOLB

The appellant seeks the revision of the Secretary General’s decision to upgrade his post to grade C3 instead of grade C5.

STAFF COMMITTEE (X)

The appeal aims to obtain the annulment of the contract concluded between the Secretary General and the Van Breda trader insurance company, or failing that, obtain the annulment of all the implementing acts or clauses of the contract to the active and retired staff of the Organisation.

Anne KLING (IV)

The appellant requests the annulment of her downgrading as a disciplinary measure.

Alfred SIXTO

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to upgrade his post.

Ljiljana STOJISAVLJEVIC

The appellants seek annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to accord them the exceptional rate of reimbursement of educational costs.

Solange STIPLOVSEK

Ana GOREY (I)

Marie-Louise WIGISHOFF

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to upgrade her post.

Cecilia Adina GLODEAN (V)

The appellant requests the Secretary General to deliver her a certificate of employment (Article 48 of Staff Regulations) according to the governing rules of the matter.

Nadine BOLENDER

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to upgrade her post.

Patrick BUCHMANN

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to reject his request for review of the upgrading of his post (grade A2 instead of grade B6).

Giuseppe CORTESE

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to upgrade his post to grade B2 instead of a grade more appropriate (grade B5 or at least B4).

Ilknur YUKSEK

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to recalculate the maximum time-limit for the renewal of her fixed-term contract.

Christopher SAWYER

The appellant seeks annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to upgrade his post.

Cecilia Adina GLODEAN (IV)

The appellant requests the Secretary General to deliver her a certificate of employment (Article 48 of Staff Regulations).

Adriana DĂGĂLIŢĂ

The appellant seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision to recruit her at grade A1 instead of A2.

Cornel Ioan GLODEAN (III)

The appellant, spouse of a staff member of the Organisation, seeks the annulment of the Secretary General’s decision not to grant his family the protection provided for article 40 of the Staff Regulations.

X

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decisions of the Secretary General not to renew the temporary (monthly) contracts.

Cornel Ioan GLODEAN (II)

The appellant seeks the annulment of the competitive examination for the recruitment of technical, secretarial and clerical support staff (grade B2) – vacancy notice N° e109/2006.

X

The applicant seeks the annulment of the decisions of the Secretary General to promote some staff members from grade B2 to grade B3 and from grade B3 to grade B4 using the exceptional upgrading procedure and advertising in the intranet site notices of upgrading concerning posts which had not been upgraded (Article 21, paragraph 5 of the Regulations on Appointments, Appendix II to Staff Regulations).

Carlos BENDITO (V) v. Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank

The appellant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank not to recognize the violation of the general principle of law of res judicata and to refuse to compensate him fully and promptly.