Mandate

The Division on Migration and Refugees (DMR) was created at the Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law (DG1on 1 February 2025 to follow-up on the action by the former Special Representative of the Secretary General on Migration and Refugees. Its mandate includes suggesting assistance and support to member states, particularly through the Network of Focal Points on Migration, seeking, collecting and analysing information on the human rights situation of migrants and refugees, as well as complementing and co-ordinating activities of other relevant Council of Europe bodies and our action with other international partners, notably the UNHCR, IOM, EU, and its specialised agencies, and other national, regional and international stakeholders, including civil society organisations. The DMR represents the Council of Europe in the UNHCR Nansen Refugee Award Selection Committee, as well as in the Consultative Forums of Frontex and of EUAA.

Back Violation of the Convention in the procedure to remove two Pakistani nationals from Romania

Violation of the Convention in the procedure to remove two Pakistani nationals from Romania

On 15 October 2020, in the Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania (application no. 80982/12), the European Court of Human Rights held, by a majority, that there had been a violation concerning the procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens (Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights).

The case concerned a procedure to remove two Pakistani nationals from Romania after they had been declared undesirable.

The Court found, in particular, that the applicants had received only very general information about the legal characterisation of the accusations against them, while none of their specific acts which allegedly endangered national security could be seen from the file. Nor had they been provided with any information about the key stages in the proceedings or about the possibility of accessing classified documents in the file through a lawyer holding authorisation to consult such documents.

Having regard to the proceedings as a whole and taking account of the margin of appreciation afforded to the States in such matters, the Court found that the limitations imposed on the applicants’ enjoyment of the rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 had not been counterbalanced in the domestic proceedings such as to preserve the very essence of those rights.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page