In today’s Chamber judgment in the case of Xhoxhaj v. Albania (application no. 15227/19) the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been:

• by a majority of 6 to 1, no violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights as regards the alleged lack of independence and impartiality of the vetting bodies,
• by a majority of 5 to 2, no violation of Article 6 § 1 as regards the alleged unfairness of the proceedings,
• by a majority of 5 to 2, no violation of Article 6 § 1 as regards the alleged lack of a public hearing before the Appeal Chamber,
• by a majority of 5 to 2, no violation of Article 6 § 1 as regards the alleged breach of the principle of legal certainty, and
• by a majority of 5 to 2 no violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).

The case concerned a Constitutional Court judge who had been dismissed from office following the outcome of proceedings commenced in relation to her, as part of an exceptional process for the reevaluation of suitability for office of all judges and prosecutors in the country, otherwise known as the vetting process. The applicant’s case was examined by the vetting bodies and her dismissal was confirmed in private by the Appeal Chamber.

The Court found in particular that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 as the vetting bodies had been independent and impartial, the proceedings had been fair, holding a public hearing before the Appeal Chamber had not been strictly required, and the principle of legal certainty had not been breached.

The Court furthermore considered that the dismissal from office had been proportionate and that the statutory lifetime ban imposed on the applicant on rejoining the justice system on the grounds of serious ethical violations had been consistent with ensuring the integrity of judicial office and public trust in the justice system, and thus had not breached her rights under Article 8.

• Press release
• Judgement