|
Going beyond the CEPEJ's report – some conclusions to be
drawn
This
file is based on a study session organised
by the CEPEJ on 9 December 2010.
Note: The documents conserved their original form
as presented during the study session.
|
|
A study on comparable member states
(In
French)
Jean-Paul JEAN, Prosecutor, Court of Appeal of Paris, Associated
Professor at the Law faculty of Poitiers, France, Chairman of the CEPEJ-GT-EVAL
Criminal justice in the CEPEJ 2010 report
(in
French)
Extract from the Revue Dalloz Actualité juridique Pénal - December
2010 - Editions Dalloz -
www.dalloz-revues.fr
Jean-Paul JEAN, Prosecutor, Court of Appeal of Paris, Associated
Professor at the Law faculty of Poitiers, France, Chairman of the CEPEJ-GT-EVAL
Divorce and litigious cases:
plumber and tools
Frans van der DOELEN, Programme Manager, Department of the Justice
System, Ministry of Justice, The Netherlands, Member of the CEPEJ-GT-EVAL
What can be said on clearance rate and disposition time?
-
general presentation
-
statistics
Adis HODZIC,
Secretariat High Judicial and Prosecutiorial council of Bosnia and
Herzegovina and Georg
STAWA, Head of Department for projects, strategy and innovation, Federal Ministry of Justice, Austria,
Vice-President of the CEPEJ
An analysis of the criminal case flow in European courts
Beata GRUSZCZYŃSKA, Criminologist, Chair of Criminology and Criminal
Policy at Warsaw University, Head of Criminal Statistics and
Research Division at Institute of Justice in Poland and member of
the CEPEJ's working group
Some lessons on training of judges and prosecutors
Elsa García-Maltrás, Senior Public Prosecutor, Spanish member of
CEPEJ
|