At a glance
About the CEPEJ
A word from the President
Meeting reports
Gathering around CEPEJ
European Day for Justice
The Crystal Scales of Justice Award
Evaluation of Judicial Systems
Judicial time management
Quality of justice
Targeted co-operation
Court management in Turkey (JP COMASYT)
South programme (Morocco, Tunisia and Jordan)
Support to the Jordanian authorities in improving the quality and efficiency of the Jordanian justice system
Eastern partnership (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine)
Increase the efficiency of the Albanian justice system

Activities of the network



Activities of the network
In the field
CEPEJ documents
Legal instruments
ECHR judgements
Thematic files
Press releases
CEPEJ Studies
Simple search
Advanced search
News: RSS format
Country profile
Country Profiles A-Z
COE bodies, international organisations ...
Restricted access
Discussion Forum
Users' guide of the Forum
Reset password
Evaluation scheme

Justice in the United Kingdom hardly affected by the Crisis

Among the largest member states the UK is probably one of the hardest hit by the economic crisis. Following the recent general election an emergency budget was introduced where it was announced that public spending would be dramatically reduced. The cuts would be applied across nearly all Government Departments and the Ministry of Justice has been asked to reduce its costs by 23% over four years which amounts to 500 million each year for the next four years.
The Ministry of Justice has just produced a plan to achieve these savings which fall into five areas:

In reality what will be the impact of the changes? In terms of prisons it is accepted that the prison population is too high and continues to increase at an alarming rate. To combat this, a review will be undertaken of the sentencing policy to make great use of non-custodial sentences e.g. community based penalties together with the introduction of schemes to reduce the re-offending rate. It is also proposed that over 150 courts should close of which many are only part- time courts.
The provision of Legal Aid and a review of costs generally will be undertaken to ensure that those that need assistance will get at and that justice remains affordable. The number of staff working for the Ministry of Justice will be reduced and is expected that 15,000 staff will go, hopefully by natural wastage and voluntary redundancy. The number is made up of 10,000 from the National Offender Management Service and Prison Service. Court staff will be reduced by 3,000 and a further 2,000 from Headquarters and associated bodies.
Although this all sounds like bad news it should be seen as an opportunity to think the unthinkable and drive through radical reforms that would otherwise be opposed and rejected. The overall aim is to make the savings required but still ensure that access to justice is preserved for those who need it and that the community is protected from the effects of crime. Once the changes have all taken effect the Ministry of Justice will be a leaner and effective place better equipped to meet the challenges of the future.

Head of international Development of justice administration
International Directorate
Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom
Vice-President of the CEPEJ