Please select Recommendations and/or countries from the drop-down list on the right side.

Back

Everyone’s cultural heritage

Hannu Matikka © Finnish Heritage Agency

Hannu Matikka © Finnish Heritage Agency

Location of the initiative:

 FINLAND


Relation to Strategy 21 Recommendations:

S7 - Develop and promote participatory heritage identification programmes


Time span of the initiative:

The project was executed in 2014. The project report was published in the spring of 2015.


Brief description of the initiative:

“Everyone’s cultural heritage” refers to the Finnish background work for joining the Council of Europe Faro Convention. In the spirit of the Faro Convention, a participatory approach was chosen for the preparations.

The purpose of the project was to map and assess the citizens’ and stakeholders’ views regarding the topical challenges in fostering cultural heritage and promote discussion on the value of heritage for society, communities and individual citizens. Another aim was to make the Convention and its content better known in Finland. Identification of existing good practice was an additional goal.

In the interactive preparation process, an open Internet survey (otakantaa.fi) was executed and three discussion fora were organised in different parts of the country. Social media and traditional media were actively used as well. The dialogue was structured under three themes: first, cultural heritage as part of everyday life of communities and individuals, second, heritage as a resource for sustainable development, and third, open, fair and people-oriented heritage governance.

The Internet survey mapped what kind of heritage and environment were regarded as significant and valuable by the respondents. It contained questions such as: what kind of heritage do you wish to sustain and transmit to future generations? Do you expect and need support in fostering heritage, and, if yes, what kind of support and advice and from whom? What kind of new, innovative ways to utilize and use heritage you can name, e.g. in your neighbourhood? Should heritage be included in childhood education, primary and secondary school and adult education and how? If and how does heritage affect your quality of life? In what ways should the heritage administration be developed, what kind of new channels and methods of cooperation are needed? Also the value of heritage to society was touched upon.

The project, executed in 2014, was a joint effort of the National Board of Antiquities and the Finnish Local Heritage Federation. The Ministry of Culture and Education financed the project. The final report of the project presented the Convention and its main principles, as well as contained an analysis of the findings of the project and outlined a number of conclusions on the consequences of the ratification of the Convention. The report published in the spring of 2015 also recommended the ratification of the Faro Convention.


Objectives of the initiative:

  • Explore the implications of the ratification of the Council of Europe Faro Convention
  • Make suggestions for actions in the spirit of the Convention
  • Arouse discussion on the value of cultural heritage for society, communities and individuals

Brief assessment of the initiative’s results:

“Everyone’s cultural heritage” strengthened the process of the ratification of the Faro Convention and the sense of shared responsibility as well as improved the capability of the officials to take into account the needs of the public.


Online resources:


Contact:

Ulla Salmela
tel. +358 295 33 6251
ulla.salmela@museovirasto.fi


Filter by Filter by
Components
1. THE ”SOCIAL COMPONENT” (S)
S1
S10
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
2. THE “TERRITORIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT” COMPONENT (D)
D1
D10
D11
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7
D8
D9
3. THE “KNOWLEDGE AND EDUCATION COMPONENT” (K)
K1
K10
K11
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
K7
K8
K9
Countries
Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Europe
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Holy See
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Moldova
Romania
Russian Federation
San Marino
Serbia
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Reset Filter
Resources resources

The golden collection of good practices