Please select Recommendations and/or countries from the drop-down list on the right side.

Back

Portfolio Immovable Heritage

Photo credit: Beveren/Portfolio Immovable Heritage© Ameels Vera

Photo credit: Beveren/Portfolio Immovable Heritage© Ameels Vera

Location of the initiative:

Flanders (BELGIUM)


Initiator

Agentschap Onroerend Erfgoed / National authority


Relation to Strategy 21 Recommendations:

D5 - encourage the reuse of heritage and use of traditional knowledge and practice


Time span of the initiative:

Start date: 2018 / End date: This selection will continue to grow in the coming months and years, giving an idea of new possibilities in the management of protected heritage


Motivation / Methodology

By collecting good practices from the daily work of our heritage consultants, illustrating them with good photographs, and by putting them together on the website we hope to inspire heritage owners and professionals.

The website provides practical examples of heritage projects in Flanders. Each example contains insights gained in projects to which the Flanders Heritage agency has contributed.

On a daily basis, our heritage consultants advise motivated owners, building owners and their designers in making quality management choices for their heritage. Such collaboration usually follows an instructive trajectory, which leads to striking results, new insights, and a great deal of satisfaction for all parties afterwards. We asked our heritage consultants to select a few projects they recently supervised, which they consider to be an excellent example of heritage management.

This Portfolio bundles those choices and illustrates them appropriately with colourful photographs. It is a sample of what heritage management in Flanders has to offer today. The overview on this website is intended as a source of inspiration for heritage owners, heritage professionals and anyone interested in dealing with heritage. This selection will continue to grow in the coming months and years, giving an idea of new possibilities in the management of protected heritage. We invite people to browse through the files, maybe get ideas for their own project, and dream away at solutions they didn't suspect existed.


Obstacles / Barriers

Examples have to be picked out and selected carefully. We are working with dozens of heritage consultants, that don’t always have the same opinion on the different projects. So, it is not always easy to obtain a result that is carried unanimously, when selecting examples


Change / Impact

People get inspired. The website helps to dispel prejudices such as "nothing can and should be done with protected heritage".

When first meeting new owners, heritage consultants can immediately refer to a number of good examples. Meanwhile we are receiving requests from designers, to include their projects in our Portfolio. The Portfolio is becoming a go-to website for the press, when we publish stories about restoration.


Lessons learned

As a governmental institute, it is important for us to remain objective. Theoretically, every project that received financial support from us, should be equally suited as a good example. Otherwise we wouldn’t have supported them. To select that top layer of projects as a source of inspiration for others, we had to dig deeper in each project, to find those examples of restoration that supersede the merely technical. Restorations that give a building a future and at the same time make it a central point of a community (neighbours, co-workers, …) or find a new role for a building that lies close to its origin and intended purpose, become increasingly more important in our society. High quality restoration and design is only a starting point; lifting an historical building to a higher purpose is a bonus that makes it fit in our Portfolio. This is the future of heritage conservation.


Online resources


Contact information

Contact person: Vera Ameels
Organisation : Agentschap Onroerend Erfgoed
Email: vera.ameels@vlaanderen.be
Phone: +32477560415
Website: https://www.onroerenderfgoed.be/


Source of financing

Public and private funding


Filter by Filter by
Components
1. THE ”SOCIAL COMPONENT” (S)
S1
S10
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
2. THE “TERRITORIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT” COMPONENT (D)
D1
D10
D11
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7
D8
D9
3. THE “KNOWLEDGE AND EDUCATION COMPONENT” (K)
K1
K10
K11
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
K7
K8
K9
Countries and International Organisations
Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Europe
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Holy See
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Moldova
Romania
Russian Federation
San Marino
Serbia
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
Ukraine
Unesco
United Kingdom
Reset Filter
Resources resources

The golden collection of good practices