Evaluation is sometimes based on individual perceptions. In order to mitigate the subjectivity of perceptions, objective evidence is extracted from different sources of information. This method of triangulation helps to deal with the challenge of checking the correctness of information provided.


The credibility and usefulness of evaluations are our main concern. This requires on the one hand, to have a good ‘ear’ for the organisation’s burning issues and, on the other, to link up with the major international players in the evaluation community to be aware of and apply state of the art evaluation methods and standards.

Our policy is to make the evaluation process inclusive and participatory. Once the initial reservations turn into open dialogue, the persons involved in implementing a CoE intervention have a lot to share and contribute to discussions. Reference groups which involve the key stakeholders guide us throughout the evaluations. As an additional support, we often rely on focus groups to give us a reality check and benefit from collective knowledge. The members are selected from those who have hands-on experience of the subject matter.


According to the Evaluation Policy (CM(2008)156) updated by the Committee of Ministers in April 2014 (CM(2014)15corr) the main types of evaluation carried out within the Council of Europe are:

  • Evaluation of projects and programmes of the biennial Programme and Budget (including thematic and cross-cutting evaluation, regional or country programme evaluation);
  • Organisational evaluation (which refers to the functioning of the Council of Europe), including institutional arrangements, Council of Europe offices and Partial Agreements.

 
DIO Evaluation Guidelines describe the implementation modalities of the Policy. They are meant for everyone who wants to understand how evaluation works in the CoE from the identification of evaluation topics, the planning and preparation, to the implementation of an evaluation and its follow-up.