There is currently worldwide concern over corruption in education. This concern touches all Member States and all levels of education.
While some forms of corruption may be difficult to evaluate or quantify, no country today can claim to be totally exempt from corruption in the education sector.
The Council of Europe Platform on Ethics, Transparency and Integrity in Education (ETINED) will try to address this challenge through a genuinely European dialogue and by drawing upon the materials and norms developed by the Council of Europe over the years.
Evaluation of impact – project ‘Strengthening Integrity and Combatting Corruption in Higher Education in Armenia’ (2015-2017)23 January 2018
When the project ends, it is a good time to reflect on its results and its impact. What it has...
Belgrade, Serbia 20/12/20107
A nine-member delegation of Montenegrin higher education professionals participated at the...
Key results discussed at Conference of the Project “Strengthening Integrity and Combatting Corruption in Higher Education in Armenia”Yerevan, Armenia 04/12/2017
What was the impact of the Project “Strengthening Integrity and Combatting Corruption in Higher...
The ETINED Platform is a network of specialists appointed by member States of the Council of Europe and of States Parties to the European Cultural Convention (50 States). Its mission is to share good practices in the field of transparency and integrity in education, to define guidelines on the subject and to develop capacity-building for all actors.
ETINED wants to propose a new approach based on the idea that quality education will only be achieved, and corruption effectively addressed, if all relevant sectors of society commit fully to fundamental positive ethical principles for public and professional life, rather than relying only upon top-down mechanistic regulatory measures.
ETINED wants to help developing a culture of democracy and participation, based on the principles of ethics, transparency and integrity. Corruption should be fought through legal norms and structures, but it is not enough. It must also be considered unacceptable by stakeholders and the public at large.