Reforms to protect family life after a father was separated from his daughter

Hokkanen v. Finland  | 1994

Reforms to protect family life after a father was separated from his daughter

the non-enforcement of the applicant’s right of access … constituted a breach of his right to respect for family life…

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, September 1994


Teuvo Hokkanen was a farmer. He and his wife had a daughter, Sini. Two years later Teuvo’s wife died. Sini’s maternal grandparents then looked after her. According to Teuvo, this was a temporary arrangement whilst he dealt with problems caused by his wife’s death. 

Soon afterwards, Sini’s grandparents told Teuvo that they did not intend to give her back to him. Legal disputes took place over custody of the child, lasting for seven years. During this time, the grandparents refused to let Teuvo have any contact with Sini. Teuvo obtained court rulings ordering there to be meetings – but they were not enforced.

Eventually the courts decided that it was in Sini’s best interests to stay with her grandparents.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court found no grounds to question the Finnish courts’ decision that it was in Sini’s best interests to stay with her grandparents. However, it ruled that Teuvo should have been able to have contact with his daughter. Indeed, the Finnish courts had ruled that such contact was in Sini’s best interests. Yet the authorities had failed to make sure that there were regular meetings between father and daughter.

This had violated Teuvo’s right to family life.   

[The Convention] includes a right for the parent to have measures taken with a view to his or her being reunited with the child and an obligation for the national authorities to take such action.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, September 1994


The Finnish authorities took steps to make sure that a similar situation would not happen again. The European court’s judgment was communicated to the relevant government ministries. A seminar was organised for social workers, in which emphasis was placed on avoiding such situations.  The law was also changed to make sure that court rulings in child custody cases would be properly enforced.

Related examples

Father wins battle to see his son - and rights for all Czech parents

When Vladimír Zavřel’s wife left the family home, she took the couple’s six-year-old son and prevented Vladimir from seeing him. Vladimir got a court order for contact with his boy, but the authorities failed to enforce it. The European court ruled that this had violated the right to family life. Contact was re-established and the law was changed to prevent similar situations happening again.

Read more

Woman wins landmark case for the rights of single mothers and their children

Paula Marckx was unmarried when she had a baby girl. Paula was shocked to discover that, because she was single, her child would not be recognised as being hers unless she went through a legal process. Even after this, her daughter would have a reduced legal status and would not inherit from her. The European court ruled this violated their right to family life – leading to a change to Belgian...

Read more

Reforms made after mother lost custody of her children simply because of her religion

Ingrid Hoffmann was a Jehovah’s Witness. When she got divorced, a child psychologist advised that Ingrid should be given custody of her two children, because of their close emotional ties. However, a court ruled that the father should get custody, because of Ingrid’s religion. The European court ruled that this had been discriminatory – leading to changes to prevent the same happening again.

Read more

Justice for thousands of “erased” people after 20 years without rights

In February 1992, 25,671 people in Slovenia were automatically stripped of their right to live there. Many people – including Ana Mezga - had their papers taken away, were evicted from their homes, could not work, lost personal possessions or had their families broken apart. The law was changed and a compensation scheme set up after a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights.

Read more

Reforms after children were taken away from their parents because they were poor

Emílie Wallová and Jaroslav Walla’s five children were taken away by the authorities, on the grounds that the parents did not have enough money to look after them. The Strasbourg court ruled that taking the children away in these circumstances had breached the parents’ right to family life. New legislation banned putting children in care just because of the financial situation of their parents.

Read more

Vulnerable child was denied a full adoption because her new mother was single

With the help of an international agency, Jeanne Wagner adopted a child from an orphanage in Peru. However, after they travelled back to Europe, the Luxembourg courts refused to recognise the full adoption because Jeanne was not married. The European court ruled that this was unfair and violated the right to family life. The adoption was recognised and the ban on single-parent adoption was ended.

Read more

A mother’s struggle to be with her children leads to better protection for family life

M.D. lost custody of her two children after the authorities found that her former partner had been beating them and she had not protected them. M.D. then ended her relationship with the abusive partner and tried to get her children back. However, under Maltese law she had lost custody of the children forever, and she had no way to challenge this in the national courts.

Read more