Woman wins landmark case for the rights of single mothers and their children

Marckx v. Belgium  | 1979

Woman wins landmark case for the rights of single mothers and their children

I had a daughter who was a few months old and I was told that she had no rights.

Paula Marckx, in a video interview from the Belgian government  - © Photo Council of Europe



Paula Marckx blessed her luck when she discovered she would become a mother at the age of forty-seven. However, a few months after her baby Alexandra was born, Paula discovered that – legally speaking – she was not [yet] the girl’s mother.

That was because Paula was single. A letter from the authorities said that, because the baby was born outside of marriage, it was not automatically recognised as being Paula’s. To obtain some kind of recognition, she had to go through a legal process.

Paula was insulted that she did not automatically qualify as a mother just because she was a single woman. Worse, she discovered that even after going through this legal process, her baby would not have the same status as if she had been married. In particular, Alexandra would not stand to inherit from Paula when she died.

When she complained to an official, Paula was told that: “Women always protest but are never prepared to take action.”

Paula decided to take action. She brought the case to the European Court of Human Rights.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The court ruled that Belgian law had failed to properly respect the ties between Paula and her daughter. This had violated the right to family life of both Paula and Alexandra. 

I thought I was going to get a note back to say that my child would be mine, but not that the impact would be so great.

Paula Marckx, in interview with Zwijgen is Geen Optie


Belgian law was changed to establish equal inheritance rights for the children of unmarried parents. In 1987, the Civil Code was also amended to automatically recognise the legal bond between an unmarried mother and her child from birth.

Libelle magazine named Paula Marckx Belgium’s Woman of the Year for 1980.

Related examples

Reforms made following the inhuman treatment of a four-year-old girl

When she was four years old, Tabitha Mitunga was detained by the Belgian authorities for almost two months – without family, friends, or anybody assigned to look after her. She suffered psychological damage and the Strasbourg court ruled that her rights had been violated. Her case highlighted the need for better protections for unaccompanied children in Belgium and led to substantial reforms.

Read more

Father wins battle to see his son - and rights for all Czech parents

When Vladimír Zavřel’s wife left the family home, she took the couple’s six-year-old son and prevented Vladimir from seeing him. Vladimir got a court order for contact with his boy, but the authorities failed to enforce it. The European court ruled that this had violated the right to family life. Contact was re-established and the law was changed to prevent similar situations happening again.

Read more

Reforms to protect family life after a father was separated from his daughter

When Teuvo Hokkanen’s wife died he temporarily allowed her parents to look after his daughter, Sini. The grandparents then refused to return Sini or to let Teuvo see her. The Finnish courts ordered regular meetings to take place between Teuvo and his daughter, but the authorities failed to enforce that order. The European court ruled that this had violated Teuvo’s right to family life.

Read more

Reforms made after mother lost custody of her children simply because of her religion

Ingrid Hoffmann was a Jehovah’s Witness. When she got divorced, a child psychologist advised that Ingrid should be given custody of her two children, because of their close emotional ties. However, a court ruled that the father should get custody, because of Ingrid’s religion. The European court ruled that this had been discriminatory – leading to changes to prevent the same happening again.

Read more

Justice for thousands of “erased” people after 20 years without rights

In February 1992, 25,671 people in Slovenia were automatically stripped of their right to live there. Many people – including Ana Mezga - had their papers taken away, were evicted from their homes, could not work, lost personal possessions or had their families broken apart. The law was changed and a compensation scheme set up after a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights.

Read more

Reforms after children were taken away from their parents because they were poor

Emílie Wallová and Jaroslav Walla’s five children were taken away by the authorities, on the grounds that the parents did not have enough money to look after them. The Strasbourg court ruled that taking the children away in these circumstances had breached the parents’ right to family life. New legislation banned putting children in care just because of the financial situation of their parents.

Read more

Vulnerable child was denied a full adoption because her new mother was single

With the help of an international agency, Jeanne Wagner adopted a child from an orphanage in Peru. However, after they travelled back to Europe, the Luxembourg courts refused to recognise the full adoption because Jeanne was not married. The European court ruled that this was unfair and violated the right to family life. The adoption was recognised and the ban on single-parent adoption was ended.

Read more