Back

Justice and reforms after airmen were given criminal convictions for their religious activities

Larissis and Others v. Greece  | 1998

Justice and reforms after airmen were given criminal convictions for their religious activities

Background

Dimitrios Larissis, Savvas Mandalarides and Ioannis Sarandis were all officers in the Greek air force. They were also members of the Pentecostal Church, whose members have a duty to talk to others about their understanding of the Christian faith and encourage them to join their church.

All three airmen were prosecuted for evangelising their religion, which was treated as a criminal offence. They were all convicted and given suspended prison sentences of over a year.

The men took their case to the European Court of Human Rights, claiming that it had been unfair to convict them simply for discussing their religious faith with others.  

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The court ruled that it may have been appropriate to discipline the officers for promoting their religion to soldiers under their command, but their criminal prosecution for discussing their faith in ordinary civilian life had violated their right to religious freedom. 

Follow-up

The law was changed so that the soldiers in the case could erase the convictions from their criminal records.

As a result of this case and others, the Greek government made sure that no similar prosecutions would be carried out in future. Reporting on the issue six years after the judgment, the Greek government confirmed that no such prosecutions had been carried out. 


Related examples

Reforms made after mother lost custody of her children simply because of her religion

Ingrid Hoffmann was a Jehovah’s Witness. When she got divorced, a child psychologist advised that Ingrid should be given custody of her two children, because of their close emotional ties. However, a court ruled that the father should get custody, because of Ingrid’s religion. The European court ruled that this had been discriminatory – leading to changes to prevent the same happening again.

Read more

Airline worker wins fight for religious freedom

Nadia Eweida worked for British Airways (BA). She wore a small silver cross around her neck, as a sign of her religious faith. BA suspended Nadia from work without pay because her cross violated its uniform policy. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that this was an unreasonable interference with Nadia’s right to freedom of religion - leading to a change in relevant standards in the UK.

Read more

Protection for religious freedom after church banned from existence

The Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia is an Orthodox Christian Church. The Moldovan authorities refused to register it as a religious organisation, meaning that it could not own property and its members could not meet to practice their religion. The Strasbourg court ruled that the authorities’ refusal to recognise the church had been disproportionate. Substantial reforms were made to protect...

Read more

Reforms made after unreasonable punishment given to conscientious objector

Iakovos Thlimmenos was a Jehovah’s Witness. He refused to do military service on religious grounds, and was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. Upon his release, he was also prevented from working as an accountant. The Strasbourg court ruled that this had been unreasonable and unjustified - amounting to discrimination based on religion. Laws were changed as a result.

Read more

Reforms to prevent government interference with religious organisations

In 1995 the Bulgarian government removed the elected Chief Mufti of Bulgarian Muslims and appointed a different leader. The Strasbourg court ruled that this had been arbitrary government interference with a religious organisation, which breached the right to religious freedom. A new law was passed to end government control over the registration of religious groups.

Read more

Justice for man convicted because of his religious beliefs

Vahan Bayatyan is a Jehovah’s Witness. Aged 18 he asked to do civilian rather than military service, due to his religious beliefs. He was convicted of draft evasion, and sentenced to over two years’ imprisonment. The Strasbourg court ruled that this had violated Mr Bayatyan’s right to religious freedom. Subsequent changes were made to the system of national service.

Read more