Certified Cultural Routes regular evaluations
Every three years, certified Cultural Routes are required to submit a report enabling the Governing Board of the EPA to evaluate their activities in order to ascertain whether they continue to satisfy with the List of eligibility criteria for themes, List of priority fields of action, List of criteria for networks as well as visilibity criteria.
More specifically, according to Part IV Article 3 of the Committee of Minister Resolution CM/Res(2013)67:
In addition to an annual programme of activities and an annual report submitted to the European Institute of Cultural Routes, networks must submit every three years a report enabling the Governing Board of the EPA to evaluate their activities in order to ascertain whether they continue to satisfy the criteria in parts I, II, III and IV.2 above.
If the Governing Board of the EPA finds the compliance with parts I, II, III and IV.2 above unsatisfactory it will issue a recommendation in order to ensure this compliance. If the recommendation is not followed within a year, the Governing Board of the EPA may decide on the withdrawal of the certification after consultation of the relevant intergovernmental committee.
In case the intergovernmental committee concerned is of the opinion that the certification should not be withdrawn, the agreement of the Committee of Ministers will be required for the withdrawal of the certification.
The Parts I, II, III and IV.2 mentioned above respectively refer to the List of eligibility criteria for themes, the List of priority field of action, the List of criteria for networks, and the Certification visibility criteria which can be found in the Committee of Ministers Resolution CM/Res(2013)67.
Regular evaluation cycle 2017-2018
Regular evaluation cycle 2016-2017
Regular evaluation cycle 2015-2016