Latvia: new GRECO report on corruption prevention in central government and law enforcement bodies

Latvia to further boost the integrity, transparency and accountability of those exercising top executive functions in central government and of police and border guard staff
Group of States against corruption (GRECO) Strasbourg 21 August 2018
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page
  • Imprimer en PDF

The Council of Europe’s Group of States against corruption (GRECO) has published today its fifth round evaluation report on Latvia dealing with corruption prevention in central government (top executive functions) and law enforcement bodies.

GRECO concludes that Latvia’s integrity and corruption prevention framework is fairly comprehensive and that, in the past twenty years, significant resources have been injected to curb corruption, strengthen accountability and augment public trust in the two sectors covered by the evaluation. Yet, many shortcomings persist.

Integrity in top executive functions needs to be reinvigorated significantly. The carrying out of regular integrity risk assessments and the elaboration on that basis of enforceable principles and standards of conduct for Cabinet members, other political officials in the Offices of the Prime Minister and his/her Deputies and unpaid advisors in central government as well as obliging them to report conflicts of interest as they arise (ad hoc) is imperative. All political officials, apart from the Cabinet members and parliamentary secretaries who are barred from exercising ancillary activities, are to obtain permission to do so. The names of paid and unpaid advisors in central government are not easily searchable and would benefit from being made easily accessible online. The veracity of asset declarations of Cabinet members and other political officials is to undergo systematic in-depth and independent scrutiny and whenever the declarations are up-dated, they are to be made publicly accessible online as provided for in law.

As for the State Police (SP) and the State Border Guard (SBG), transparency can be further enhanced through specific legal provision being made for the public advertisement of vacant posts. Although the adoption of codes of ethics and the establishment of ethics committees by both services is praised, the SBG’s Code is not free from omissions inter alia in relation to gifts, lobbying and conduct not covered. Also, the codes and ethics committee rules of both services need to be harmonised, and objective and transparent criteria elaborated for assessing compliance as part of periodic performance reviews. It would be important to allocate more resources to the SP and the SBG in order for them to better perform their tasks, bring about consistency in the allocation of bonuses, and to adopt and implement whistleblowing protection mechanisms.

See also the Latvian version of the report.

Follow us Follow us


Galleries Galleries
galleries link
Facebook Facebook
@coe on twitter @coe on twitter