One of the aims of the CEPEJ consists in preventing appeals to the European Court of Human Rights based on the poor running of judicial systems (Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights) by helping to improve the functioning of justice in the European States. The European Court of Humans Rights based its rulings in several judgements on certain aspects of the work of the CEPEJ, in particular those aimed at preventing the violation of reasonable timeframes of procedures.

• Case of Momčilović v. Croatia – Judgement of 26 March 2015
  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial
• Case of Vlad and others v. Romania – Judgement of 26 November 2013
  Length of legal proceedings that the three applicants had been involved in before the Romanian courts, and the remidy available for their excessive length
• Case of Xynos v. Greece – Judgment of 30 October 2012
  Pay related action the applicant brought in the civil courts against the State hospital where she worked as a cleaner
• Case Cengiz Kiliç v. Turquie - Judgment of 6 December 2011
  Excessive length of divorce proceedings involving the issues of parental responsibility and contact for the parent not living with the child and the value of recourse to family mediation
• Case Finger v. Bulgarie - Judgment of 10 August 2011
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved absence of effective legal remedies for excessive length of civil, administrative and criminal proceedings
• Case Dimitrov et Hamanov v. Bulgarie - Judgment of 10 August 2011
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved absence of effective legal remedies for excessive length of civil, administrative and criminal proceedings
• Case of Scordino v. Italy (No. 1) - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Unjustified infrigment of the applicants' right to respect for their property and violation of their right to a fair trial
• Case of Cocchiarella v. Italy - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved - Inadequate amount of compensation granted
• Case of Riccardi Pizzati v. Italy - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved - Inadequate amount of compensation granted
• Case of Musci v. Italy - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved - Inadequate amount of compensation granted
• Case of Mostacciuolo v. Italy (No. 1) - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved - Inadequate amount of compensation granted
• Case of Mostacciuolo v. Italy (No. 2) - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved - Inadequate amount of compensation granted
• Case of Procaccini v. Italy - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved - Inadequate amount of compensation granted
• Case of Zullo Ernestina v. Italy - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved - Inadequate amount of compensation granted
• Case of Apicella v. Italy - Judgment of 29 March 2006
  Length of a civil procedure in which he was involved - Inadequate amount of compensation granted