Back

Reinstatement of judge said to be the victim of political corruption

Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine   | 2013

Reinstatement of judge said to be the victim of political corruption

One of the most important judgments against Ukraine was the recent case of Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, as it touched upon the central issue of the whole system of human rights protection – independence of the judiciary.

Ganna Yudkivska, Ukrainian Judge at the European Court of Human Rights
© Photo Newspaper Cудебно-юридическая газета «Суд инфо»

Background

Oleksandr Volkov was a Supreme Court judge. Members of the High Council of Justice applied to Parliament to have him sacked. Mr Volkov said he had done nothing wrong, and the case against him had been rigged.  His legal representative argued that Mr Volkov had been the victim of political corruption, which sought to undermine judicial independence. 

Parliament voted for his dismissal, and Mr Volkov was removed from office in 2010.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The Strasbourg court ruled that the dismissal of Mr Volkov had been biased and manipulated. Neither the High Council of Justice nor the relevant Parliamentary committee had been impartial, and a number of their members had been personally biased against Mr Volkov. During the vote on his dismissal in Parliament, certain members had illegally voted in the place of others who were absent. When the dismissal was reviewed in court, the judges were unable to take an impartial position, properly review the case or take any meaningful action in response to it.

Mr Volkov’s dismissal had breached his right to a fair trial, and his right to private and family life.

The court holds that the respondent State shall secure the applicant’s reinstatement to the post of judge of the Supreme Court at the earliest possible date.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, 9th January 2013

Follow-up

Mr Volkov was reinstated as a Supreme Court judge on 2 February 2015. Following the case, the Ukrainian government has also carried out substantial legislative and institutional reforms in order to improve the independence and impartiality of the judiciary:

  • Changes to the constitution and the adoption of two major laws in order to improve structural protections of judicial independence;
  • Re-organisation of the High Council of Justice, the body in charge of administering the Ukrainian justice system to reduce the possibility of any political influence;
  • Parliament no longer has any influence on judicial discipline and careers of judges;
  • Creation of objective procedures for evaluating judges and disciplinary sanctions;
  • Restrictions on the powers of prosecutors to discipline judges; and
  • Effective judicial review and appeals procedure against decisions to remove or discipline judges.

The Council of Europe continues to monitor efforts in support of an independent and impartial judiciary in Ukraine.

Additional information


Related examples

Failure to investigate attack on Roma settlement leads to local reforms

All of the Roma inhabitants of a village had their houses burnt down by other locals. The authorities were warned, but refused to intervene. After the attack, the authorities did not investigate properly and the courts failed to give the victims a fair trial. Their application to Strasbourg led to compensation and local programmes to combat discrimination and exclusion.

Read more

Unfair trial leads to reforms to protect justice

César Igual Coll was cleared of failing to pay family maintenance, because he was unemployed and had no money. However, his case went to appeal. The appeal court held no public hearing and no evidence was taken from him. Nevertheless, César was convicted and sentenced to jail. The European court ruled that he had been denied a fair hearing. Changes were made to protect fair trials in Spain.

Read more

Unreasonably long legal proceedings lead to reforms to speed up access to justice

The European court identified numerous cases where legal proceedings in Lithuania had taken an unreasonably long time. One example was that of Donatas Šulcas, whose case lasted for almost nine years. Following rulings by the European court, a wide range of reforms were made to reduce delays in civil, commercial, administrative and criminal cases.

Read more

Reforms to address unreasonable legal delays

Dozens of applicants complained of excessive delays to legal proceedings in Germany. One was Rüdiger Rumpf, who waited for over 13 years to have an administrative issue decided upon. The Strasbourg court identified a structural problem concerning a lack of remedies for excessively long proceedings in Germany. This led to significant reforms to tackle the problem.

Read more

Suspicions of a biased judge lead to reforms to protect a fair legal system

DMD Group was involved in a valuable legal claim against other companies. A judge in charge of allocating cases arranged to hear the claim himself, then abruptly dismissed it. The DMD Group suspected the judge had deliberately arranged to reject their case. The European court said that the rules allowing the judge to control the case had been unfair – leading to reforms to the justice system.

Read more

Case highlights the need to protect the impartiality of judges

Mrs M had her legal dispute presided over by a judge who was closely related to two of the lawyers representing the other side. The Strasbourg court ruled that Mrs M’s fears of impartiality had been justified and her right to a fair trial had been breached.

Read more

Unfair trial leads to fairer criminal procedures

Two men were convicted of a robbery on the basis of evidence which had been manipulated by police. The Strasbourg court ruled that the defendants had an unfair trial. The law was changed to improve the identification of suspects and protect the right to a fair trial in Albania.

Read more

Reforms introduced after police failed to properly investigate a racist attack

One night in the village of Gánovce-Filice, Roma villagers were beaten with baseball bats and iron bars by other locals. The Strasbourg court ruled that the authorities failed to properly investigate, or punish those responsible. The case was re-opened and legal changes were made to help the authorities’ tackle racist crimes.

Read more

Torture of man in custody influences reforms to end police abuse of detainees

Olsi Kaçiu was tortured by police and forced to give a statement which was later used to convict him. The Strasbourg court found that his torture and unfair trial had violated Mr Kaçiu’s basic rights. As a result of this case and others, a range of reforms were introduced to prevent the ill-treatment of detainees and the use of evidence obtained through ill-treatment.

Read more

An end to government control over the right to appeal to the Constitutional Tribunal

Mr Millan wanted to appeal his case to the Constitutional Tribunal. However, the law said that a government body could refuse permission – which it did. Whilst the case was in Strasbourg, the government settled the case – agreeing that people should be able to appeal without government permission.

Read more

Legal reforms to tackle delays in getting justice

Hundreds of applicants complained of excessively long proceedings in Turkish courts. One was Fatma Ormancı, whose claim that the government had failed to protect her husband from terrorism was undecided for almost 6 years. The Strasbourg court found that applicants in over 280 cases faced excessively long delays in Turkish legal proceedings – leading to substantial reforms.

Read more

Justice for the family of asbestos poisoning victim

Hans Moor was exposed to asbestos during his work in the 1960s and 70s. This gave him cancer, which was diagnosed in 2004. Hans Moor died in 2005, aged 58. Just before his death, Mr Moor had brought a claim for damages against his former employer for failing to take precautions against exposure to asbestos. The claim was continued by his wife and children.

Read more

Changes to legal procedures after detainee denied the opportunity to make his case in court

Peter Frommelt asked to be released whilst awaiting trial for financial crimes. When this was considered on appeal, neither he nor his lawyer were allowed to make any legal arguments. The Strasbourg court ruled that this had been unfair. The procedures were changed, allowing people to make comments to a court in such circumstances.

Read more

Reforms to protect access to justice after applications to Strasbourg highlight unreasonably long legal proceedings

The European Court of Human Rights identified well over a thousand cases where Italian legal proceedings had taken an unreasonably long time. One example was the case of Mr Ceteroni , whose litigation about his family business had lasted for over a decade. A wide range of reforms were introduced to reduce delays.

Read more

Court system reformed after justice delayed for over a decade

Aleksandar Caminski was attacked by five people. Charges were brought against the suspects, but it took 11 years for them to be brought to trial. The Strasbourg court found that this delay was unreasonably long. Along with other cases, this helped bring about significant changes to cut the length of proceedings in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Read more