Back

Reforms made to unreasonable government control of registered ethnicity

Ciubotaru v. Republic of Moldova  | 2010

Reforms made to unreasonable government control of registered ethnicity

Background

During the Soviet period, most people in Moldova were systematically registered as having Moldovan ethnicity.

Mihai Ciubotaru is a writer and a professor of French. He lived in Chisinau. His parents were born in an area which was then part of Romania. However, it later became part of the Soviet Union, and is now in present-day Moldova. Mr Ciubotaru and his parents had all been registered by the Soviet authorities as ethnically Moldovan.

In 2002 Mr Ciubotaru applied to have his identity changed from “Moldovan” to “Romanian”. His request was rejected, both by the State authority and the courts. The reason was that Mr Ciubotaru’s parents had not been registered as ethnic Romanians. According to the authorities, Mr Ciubotaru had no way to challenge these records, and register a different identity.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The Strasbourg court ruled that Mr Ciubotaru had clear links with the Romanian ethnic group. However, under Moldovan law his ethnicity was determined by the records of his parents. This left Mr Ciubotaru with in an identity determined by a previous government policy, which he was not able to change. In these circumstances, the Moldovan authorities had failed to safeguard his right to private life. 

Follow-up

In 2012 the Moldovan Parliament changed the law. It decided that, when someone reaches their sixteenth birthday, their ethnicity is registered at their request according to their own wishes. Information on birth certificates and other documents can also be altered at the request of an individual.

Mr Ciubotaru’s legal proceedings were re-opened, and the Moldovan courts found in his favour. They ordered the authorities to change the ethnicity on his birth certificate to Romanian.


Related examples

Reforms made following the inhuman treatment of a four-year-old girl

When she was four years old, Tabitha Mitunga was detained by the Belgian authorities for almost two months – without family, friends, or anybody assigned to look after her. She suffered psychological damage and the Strasbourg court ruled that her rights had been violated. Her case highlighted the need for better protections for unaccompanied children in Belgium and led to substantial reforms.

Read more

Father wins battle to see his son - and rights for all Czech parents

When Vladimír Zavřel’s wife left the family home, she took the couple’s six-year-old son and prevented Vladimir from seeing him. Vladimir got a court order for contact with his boy, but the authorities failed to enforce it. The European court ruled that this had violated the right to family life. Contact was re-established and the law was changed to prevent similar situations happening again.

Read more

Justice for thousands of “erased” people after 20 years without rights

In February 1992, 25,671 people in Slovenia were automatically stripped of their right to live there. Many people – including Ana Mezga - had their papers taken away, were evicted from their homes, could not work, lost personal possessions or had their families broken apart. The law was changed and a compensation scheme set up after a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights.

Read more

Improved custody rights for fathers of children born out of marriage

Horst Zaunegger had a daughter and separated from the child’s mother. German law limited his chances to obtain joint custody, because he and the mother had never been married. After he won his case in Strasbourg, the law was changed to give fathers such as Mr Zaunegger more rights.

Read more

Fair custody rights for fathers of children born out of marriage

Under Austrian law, custody of a child born out of marriage was automatically given to the mother, with few exceptions. Meanwhile, custody of children born within marriage was decided according to the child’s best interests. At the Strasbourg court, Mr Sporer successfully argued that this was unfair – leading to a change in Austrian law.

Read more

Justice for a mother who lost custody of her child

Verica Šobota-Gajić was given custody of her children after her relationship ended. However, her former husband took their son away. Due to the authorities’ inaction, Ms Šobota-Gajić only regained custody 6 years later. The case led to reforms to make sure the right people have custody of a child.

Read more

Reforms made after a child was unable to be legally recognised as her father’s daughter

Nessa Williams-Johnston could not be legally recognised as her father’s daughter, because her father had previously been married to someone other than Nessa’s mother. After the Strasbourg court ruled in the family’s favour, new legislation was passed to give children in Nessa’s position proper legal status.

Read more

Case of a mother separated from her child

When María Iglesias Gil had a son by her ex-husband, she was given custody of the child. However, her ex-husband took the child away to the United States. When Mrs Iglesias Gil went to the Spanish courts, they refused to issue an international arrest warrant and closed the case. The Strasbourg court ruled that this decision had breached Ms Iglesias Gil’s right to family life.

Read more

Legal reforms after court-ordered child support was unpaid for thirteen years

Snežana Boucke had a baby daughter out of marriage. The father was ordered to pay child support. The authorities failed to make sure the order was enforced, and the payments were not made for 13 years. The Strasbourg court ruled that this breached Ms Boucke’s right to have court rulings properly enforced. The case led to significant reforms to improve the enforcement of court orders.

Read more

Child unable to discover identity of her father for 5 years – and reforms to protect children’s rights

A child was born outside of marriage. The mother asked the courts to establish who the father was. Due to legal delays and the father’s refusals to have a DNA test, the case lasted over 5 years. The Strasbourg court ruled that children’s rights were not properly protected. Laws were changed to help prevent the problem from happening again.

Read more

Reforms to protect family life after father was unable to see his child

Stefano Bianchi was given custody of his son when he separated from his wife. However, his wife took the child abroad and refused to return. When Mr Bianchi complained to the Swiss authorities, they failed to take action to reunite father and son. The Strasbourg court ruled that this breached Mr Bianchi’s right to family life. The relevant procedures were subsequently reformed.

Read more