Back

Librarian strangled and beaten by her partner wins justice for domestic violence victims

Valiulienė v. Lithuania  | 2013

Librarian strangled and beaten by her partner wins justice for domestic violence victims

She submitted that she had been strangled, pulled by the hair, hit in the face and kicked in the back and in other parts of her body.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, March 2013

Background

Loreta Valiulienė was 25 when she complained to the authorities about suffering domestic violence at the hands of her live-in partner. She said that he had strangled her, pulled her by her hair, hit her in the face and kicked her all over her body.

Ms Valiulienė had provided specific descriptions of the incidents and the names of witnesses. Nevertheless, the prosecutor repeatedly failed to investigate properly and tried to shut the investigation down. These attempts were blocked by a judge. However, delays in the case meant that the prosecution eventually became time-barred.

Ms Valiulienė argued that the authorities’ failure to act had denied her justice and given her partner impunity to carry out more violence.

 

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The court ruled that Ms Valiulienė had done everything in her power to get justice. Nevertheless, the failures of the authorities had meant that her partner had never had to face the allegations of committing violence against her. This had violated her basic rights.

 … all the attempts by the applicant to have her attacker prosecuted were futile.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, March 2013

Follow-up

Ms Valiulienė was awarded compensation.

Following the European court’s judgment, the Prosecutor General and Police Commissioner General enacted a series of legal acts to combat domestic violence in Lithuania. These were designed to ensure that prosecutors make swift and informed decisions on prosecution and to eliminate the faults of the pre-trail investigations of domestic violence. They also required that police protect alleged victims, that their investigations are fully effective, and that there are sufficient specialists in each operating unit of police headquarters.

Finally, a judgment from the Lithuanian Constitutional Court in 2016 established that the expiry of the statutory limitations would not preclude the national court from acting in such a way that the truth in the criminal case would be established.


Related examples

Decriminalisation of homosexuality after architect wins case in Strasbourg

For decades, Cypriot law criminalised homosexual relationships between men. Alecos Modinos suffered from strain, apprehension and fear of prosecution due to his relationship with another man. The European court ruled that the criminalisation of Alecos’ sexuality violated his basic rights to a private life. In 1998, Cyprus decriminalised homosexual relationships.

Read more

Man persecuted for his sexuality wins landmark judgment – transforming the law in Northern Ireland and beyond

Since the age of 14, Jeffrey Dudgeon experienced fear, suffering, and psychological distress because his sexuality was regarded as a crime. His house was raided by police and he was interrogated for hours. In a test case, the European court ruled that law violated the right to private life. In 1982, Northern Ireland legalised homosexual relationships – followed by many other European countries.

Read more

Reform of gun laws after police shoot dead unarmed men

Two 21-year-olds absconded from military service and went to see their grandmother. When military police arrived, the men were unarmed and non-violent - and tried to run away. Nevertheless, they were shot dead. The Strasbourg court ruled that the military police had used grossly excessive force. This case, and others, led to changes in the rules on the authorities’ use of firearms.

Read more

Better protections for peaceful demonstrations after protest was banned

An NGO organised a series of demonstrations in Warsaw, to highlight discrimination against women and minorities. The gatherings were banned, after the city’s mayor said that he was against them because they included support for homosexual rights. The Strasbourg court ruled that the ban violated the right to public assembly. This led to changes to Polish law to protect the right to protest.

Read more

Legal battle leads to stronger transgender rights

Miss B was registered as a man at birth. Later she adopted female behaviour, underwent feminising hormone therapy, and had genital surgery. However, the authorities refused to register her as a woman – causing her daily problems. The Strasbourg court ruled that her fundamental rights had been violated. French law was changed to properly recognise the identity of post-operative transgender.

Read more

Legal aid system introduced after woman suffering from domestic violence was unable to access the courts

Mrs Airey wanted to be legally separated from her husband, who was allegedly a violent alcoholic. However, there was no legal aid and she could not afford the lawyers’ fees. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the lack of legal aid effectively denied Mrs Airey access to a court, breaching her basic rights. Legal aid for such cases was introduced in Ireland in the following year.

Read more