Valiulienė v. Lithuania | 2013

Librarian strangled and beaten by her partner wins justice for domestic violence victims

[Loreta] submitted that she had been strangled, pulled by the hair, hit in the face and kicked in the back and in other parts of her body.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, March 2013

Background

Loreta Valiulienė was 25 when she complained to the authorities about suffering domestic violence at the hands of her live-in partner. She said that he had strangled her, pulled her by her hair, hit her in the face and kicked her all over her body.

Loreta had provided specific descriptions of the incidents and the names of witnesses. Nevertheless, the prosecutor repeatedly failed to investigate properly and tried to shut the investigation down. These attempts were blocked by a judge. However, delays in the case meant that the prosecution eventually became time barred.

Loreta argued that the authorities’ failure to act had denied her justice and given her partner impunity to carry out more violence.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court ruled that Loreta had done everything in her power to get justice. Nevertheless, the failures of the authorities had meant that her partner had never had to face the allegations of committing violence against her. This had violated her basic rights.

… all the attempts by [Loreta] to have her attacker prosecuted were futile.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, March 2013

Follow-up

Loreta was awarded compensation.

Following the European court’s judgment, the Prosecutor General and Police Commissioner General enacted a series of legal acts to combat domestic violence in Lithuania. These were designed to ensure that prosecutors make swift and informed decisions on prosecution and to eliminate the faults of the pre-trial investigations of domestic violence. They also required that police protect alleged victims, that their investigations are fully effective, and that there are sufficient specialists in each operating unit of police headquarters.

Finally, a Lithuanian constitutional court ruling in 2016 established that the expiry of the statutory limitations would not preclude the national court from acting in such a way that the truth in the criminal case would be established.

Additional information

Themes:

Related examples

Better protections for peaceful demonstrations after protest was banned

An NGO organised a series of demonstrations in Warsaw, to highlight discrimination against women and minorities. The gatherings were banned, after the city’s mayor said that he was against them because they included support for gay rights. The European court ruled that the ban violated the right to public assembly. This led to changes to Polish law to protect the right to protest.

Themes: Right to equality and freedom from discrimination Freedom of assembly

Poland

Legal aid system introduced after woman suffering from domestic violence was unable to access the courts

Mrs Airey wanted to be legally separated from her husband, who was allegedly a violent alcoholic. However, there was no legal aid and she could not afford the lawyers’ fees. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the lack of legal aid effectively denied Mrs Airey access to a court, breaching her basic rights. Legal aid for such cases was introduced in Ireland in the following year.

Themes: Right to equality and freedom from discrimination Right to a fair trial Freedom from violence against women

Ireland

Decriminalisation of homosexuality after architect wins case in Strasbourg

For decades, Cypriot law criminalised homosexual relationships between men. Alecos Modinos suffered from strain, apprehension and fear of prosecution due to his relationship with another man. The European court ruled that the criminalisation of Alecos’s sexuality violated his basic rights to a private life. In 1998, Cyprus decriminalised gay relationships.

Themes: Right to equality and freedom from discrimination

Cyprus

Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights