Decriminalisation of homosexuality after architect wins case in Strasbourg

Modinos v. Cyprus  | 1993

Decriminalisation of homosexuality after architect wins case in Strasbourg

I never felt I was a criminal… I thought, “something must be done

Alecos Modinos, interview with the Council of Europe  - © Photo Council of Europe



For decades, Cypriot law criminalised homosexual relationships between men, with a minimum penalty of a five-year jail term.

Alecos Modinos was an architect. He had an ongoing relationship with another man. Alecos suffered from strain, apprehension and fear of prosecution, due to the criminalisation of his personal relationship. 

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court ruled that the ban on homosexual relationships in Cyprus amounted to an unjustified interference in peoples’ private lives. It violated their basic rights. 

… we had the antiquated, Victorian, colonial law of 1885. I was a criminal.

Alecos Modinos, interview with the Council of Europe


In 1998, Cyprus decriminalised male homosexual conduct carried out in private between consenting adults.

Related examples

Man’s struggle leads to the legalisation of homosexuality in Ireland

David Norris suffered from anxiety attacks and depression after realising that any open expression of his homosexuality could lead to a criminal prosecution. The Strasbourg court ruled that the criminalisation of his sexuality breached his basic rights. In 1993, this led to the full legalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults under Irish law.

Read more

Librarian strangled and beaten by her partner wins justice for domestic violence victims

Loreta Valiulienė told the authorities that she had been attacked by her partner. However, the public prosecutor repeatedly failed to investigate properly, until the case became time-barred and the partner never faced justice. The European court ruled that these failures had violated Ms Valiulienė’s basic rights. A series of reforms were carried out to combat domestic violence in Lithuania.

Read more

Reform of gun laws after police shoot dead unarmed men

Two 21-year-olds absconded from military service and went to see their grandmother. When military police arrived, the men were unarmed and non-violent - and tried to run away. Nevertheless, they were shot dead. The Strasbourg court ruled that the military police had used grossly excessive force. This case, and others, led to changes in the rules on the authorities’ use of firearms.

Read more

Failure to investigate attack on Roma settlement leads to local reforms

All of the Roma inhabitants of a village had their houses burnt down by other locals. The authorities were warned, but refused to intervene. After the attack, the authorities did not investigate properly and the courts failed to give the victims a fair trial. Their application to Strasbourg led to compensation and local programmes to combat discrimination and exclusion.

Read more

Legal standards changed after gay father was denied custody of his child

When João Salgueiro da Silva Mouta got divorced, the Court of Appeal granted his wife custody of their daughter. A decisive reason was the fact that Mr Salgueiro da Silva Mouta was gay. The Strasbourg court ruled that this had been discriminatory, and without proper justification – leading to a change in Portuguese court practices.

Read more

Improved custody rights for fathers of children born out of marriage

Horst Zaunegger had a daughter and separated from the child’s mother. German law limited his chances to obtain joint custody, because he and the mother had never been married. After he won his case in Strasbourg, the law was changed to give fathers such as Mr Zaunegger more rights.

Read more