Ormancı and Others v. Turkey  | 2004

Legal reforms to tackle delays in getting justice

Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time...

Extract from Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights


Hundreds of applicants from Turkey brought cases to the European Court of Human Rights complaining about excessively long proceedings in the Turkish courts.

One of the applicants was Fatma Ormancı. Her husband was killed in 1991, when terrorists raided the village of Kahramanmaraş and killed all of the male inhabitants.

Along with the dead man’s children, Mrs Ormancı brought a case against the Ministry of Internal Affairs. They claimed that the State had breached its responsibility to protect the life and security of its citizens.

The claimants won the case. However, it took almost six years for the courts to deal with the claim.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

In the Ormancı case, the European court ruled that the claim had not been particularly complex, and the case had been of considerable importance to the applicants. In the circumstances, the proceedings had lasted too long. The delays had violated the applicants’ right to have their case examined in a reasonable time.

The court had found that applicants in over 280 other cases also faced excessively long delays in Turkish legal proceedings.


A series of major changes speeded up litigation in the Turkish judicial system. Reforms included streamlining procedures, simplifying rules and reorganising the Court of Cassation. The reforms affected the administrative, civil, criminal, labour, land registry, military, commercial and consumers’ courts.


Related examples

Justice for the family of asbestos poisoning victim

Hans Moor was exposed to asbestos during his work in the 1960s and 70s. This gave him cancer, which was diagnosed in 2004. Hans Moor died in 2005, aged 58. Just before his death, Mr Moor had brought a claim for damages against his former employer for failing to take precautions against exposure to asbestos. The claim was continued by his wife and children.

Read more

Failure to investigate attack on Roma settlement leads to local reforms

All of the Roma inhabitants of a village had their houses burnt down by other locals. The authorities were warned, but refused to intervene. After the attack, the authorities did not investigate properly and the courts failed to give the victims a fair trial. Their application to the European court led to compensation and local programmes to combat discrimination and exclusion.

Read more

Reinstatement of judge said to be the victim of political corruption

Oleksandr Volkov was dismissed from his role as a Supreme Court judge. His lawyer argued that he had been the victim of political corruption, which sought to undermine the independence of the Ukrainian judiciary. The European court ruled that his dismissal had been filled with bias and manipulation, in breach of his basic rights. Mr Volkov was reinstated as a Supreme Court judge in 2015.

Read more