Back

CCTV footage of suicide attempt used for publicity

Peck v. the United Kingdom  | 2003

CCTV footage of suicide attempt used for publicity

Didn't anyone wonder what effect this could have on someone who had already tried to commit suicide?

Geoffrey Peck, as reported by The Independent

Background

Geoffrey Peck suffered from depression. He attempted suicide, by cutting his wrists with a knife in the street. The police intervened to save his life.

The local council’s CCTV cameras captured the incident. The council then released the footage to the media. Pictures from the video were published in local newspapers, and the footage itself appeared on national television. Family and friends told Mr Peck that they had seen the incident on TV. Mr Peck was still suffering from severe depression at the time.

Mr Peck complained of an unnecessary violation of his privacy.   

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The court ruled that, in the circumstances, the council’s disclosure of the CCTV footage had been unjustified and disproportionate. This had violated Mr Peck’s right to private life.

Follow-up

The law and regulations were changed to require systematic justification for the use of CCTV, to restrict the disclosure of CCTV images to third parties and to set clear restrictions on monitoring and recording conversations in public spaces.  

Additional information


Related examples

Justice for businessman subjected to a police raid just because of someone else’s traffic violation

Jürgen Buck ran a small business in a town near Frankfurt. One afternoon police suddenly raided his house and office. Jürgen alleged that suspicions were raised locally that he was involved in crime, leading to a loss of business. Yet the raid had merely been an unnecessary step in proceedings against Jürgen’s son for speeding. The European court ruled that the raid had been disproportionate.

Read more

Excessive police operation against journalists leads to reforms to protect media sources

Four Belgian journalists were targeted by the police in a huge search and seizure operation aimed at identifying the source of leaked government information. The Strasbourg court ruled that the operation had been unjustified and disproportionate. The case influenced new legislation to improve protections for journalists and their sources.

Read more

Secret filming of a child in a bathroom and the reform of privacy laws

Eliza Söderman was 14 when she found out that her stepfather had hidden a secret camera to record her undressing. The police got involved, but the stepfather was cleared of any crime because his actions had not been illegal under Swedish law. The Strasbourg court found that this violated Ms Söderman’s right to privacy. The case highlighted the need for legal reforms.

Read more

DNA records of innocent people destroyed after privacy complaint

Two men from Sheffield had DNA samples taken by the police. Criminal charges against them were dropped. However, under British law the police could retain their DNA forever. The Strasbourg court ruled that keeping DNA records of innocent people breached their right to privacy.

Read more

Limits on government surveillance and the right to access information

R.V. was a postman. Along with 200 others, he was put under secret surveillance by security services – allegedly for being part of the Peace Movement. The European Commission for Human Rights found that Dutch law had not properly protected the applicants, violating their right to privacy. A new law was passed to clearly set out the circumstances and conditions in which secret surveillance can...

Read more

Privacy laws strengthened after a lawyer’s phone calls were intercepted

The authorities tapped the telephone of lawyer Hans Kopp and listened to confidential conversations. The Strasbourg court ruled that Swiss law had not properly limited the interception of confidential communications by the authorities. This violated Mr Kopp’s right to respect for privacy, leading to stronger legal protections.

Read more

Ending the unjustified storage of private information by security services

Surveillance material on five Swedes was collected by the secret services in the 1960s and 1970s. The Strasbourg court ruled that the continued storage of material on four of them had not been justified, and breached their right to privacy. Reforms were made to give people more power over personal information in the government’s possession.

Read more