N. v. Sweden |2010

Afghan woman facing gender-based persecution saved from expulsion

. . . women are at particular risk of ill-treatment in Afghanistan if perceived as not conforming to the gender roles ascribed to them by society, tradition and even the legal system.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, October 2010


N. taught women in her native Afghanistan. This put her at odds with religious hard-liners among Kabul’s leading elite. She eventually had to flee to Sweden with her husband to escape persecution. 

Sweden refused to grant asylum to N. The authorities were not satisfied that there was a real risk of her being harmed if she returned to Afghanistan.

N. separated from her husband, who was also facing expulsion, not long after arriving in Sweden. Her own family disowned her because of this. They said she had brought shame on them. N.’s husband opposed her wish to divorce him, and N. feared reprisals from his family. She faced being shunned for having broken with tradition if she went back to Afghanistan.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court found sufficient evidence of risks of reprisals from N.’s husband, his family, her own family, and from Afghan society if she was to be deported from Sweden, which would lead to a violation of the human rights convention.


Following the European court's judgment, the Swedish Migration Board granted N. a permanent residence permit in Sweden, which meant that the deportation order against her was cancelled.


Related examples

Legal code changed after a woman was excluded from a courtroom for wearing a hijab

Hagar Lachiri was excluded from a Belgian court hearing because she refused to take off the headscarf she chooses to wear as a practising Muslim. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that this violated Hagar’s religious freedom. Belgium responded to the judgment by changing the law on which the violation was based.

Read more

The landmark judgment that inspired Europe to act on violence against women

Nahide Opuz was abused by her husband for years. The violence tragically led to the murder of her mother. The European court ruled that Turkey had not done enough to protect Nahide and her mother, and, for the first time ever, that gender-based violence is a form of discrimination. The judgment helped to inspire international efforts to prevent and combat violence against women.

Read more

Forced sterilisation of Roma woman leads to stricter rules on consent to treatment

V.C. was a victim of forced sterilisation, a practice that persisted in Slovakia for decades, disproportionately affecting Roma women. The European court ruled that the procedure, carried out whilst V.C. was giving birth, amounted to ill-treatment. Slovakia brought in new rules on patients’ consent to treatment after it emerged that many other Roma women had been unlawfully sterilised.

Read more