Colaço Mestre and SIC v. Portugal | 2007

Journalist convicted for asking questions wins free speech case at European court

I was shocked to have been convicted.

José Manuel Colaço Mestre, quoted by Publico

Background

José Manuel Colaço Mestre filmed a report for the TV station SCI about the alleged bribery of Portuguese football referees. The report included an interview in which the actions of the Chairman of FC Porto and the then President of the Portuguese Football League, Mr Pinto de Costa, were discussed. José Manuel questioned his interviewee about Mr Pinto de Costa’s dual role, asking whether there was a problem with him being in charge of one of the country’s largest football clubs whilst also being “the referees’ boss”.

This was enough for Mr Pinto de Costa to press charges for criminal defamation.

José Manuel and SCI were both found guilty of defamation, solely based on the questions asked in the interview. They were both made to pay damages to Mr Pinto de Costa. José Manuel was made to pay an additional fine or face three months’ imprisonment.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court ruled that nothing said in the interview had breached journalistic ethics. The interview had been about the actions of a public figure in an area of great public concern. There had not been good enough reasons to impose such heavy punishments.

The conviction of José Manuel Colaço Mestre and SCI had therefore violated their right to free speech.

The court recalls that, according to its well established case law, freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society, and is one of the basic conditions for its progress and each individual’s self-fulfilment.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, April 2007

Follow-up

Intensive training about the protection of free speech under the European Convention on Human Rights was organised for the most senior members of the Portuguese justice system. Participants included the Minister of Justice, the Director for the Centre of Judicial Studies and over two hundred judges.

José Manuel Colaço Mestre successfully asked to have his criminal conviction revised, so that he was acquitted. Both he and SCI were paid compensation.

Additional information

Themes:

Related examples

Excessive police operation against journalists leads to reforms to protect media sources

Four Belgian journalists were targeted by the police in a huge search and seizure operation aimed at identifying the source of leaked government information. The European court ruled that the operation had been unjustified and disproportionate. The case influenced new legislation to improve protections for journalists and their sources.

Themes: Right to privacy Freedom of speech

Belgium

Legal attack on a newspaper highlights the need for free speech reforms

Before a presidential election, the newspaper The Day published articles criticising two of the candidates. The politicians sued the owners of the newspaper for damages and won. The European court found that the owners had been punished merely for publishing opinions, violating their right to free speech. The case influenced reforms to protect freedom of expression in Ukraine.

Themes: Freedom of speech

Ukraine

Justice for magazine editor ordered to pay huge damages – and new rules to protect free speech

Retired journalist Veseljko Koprivica was ordered to pay huge damages after losing a defamation case. The European court ruled that the damages awarded were so excessive that they violated his right to free speech. A ruling by the Supreme Court of Montenegro specified that damages for defamation should not be high enough to discourage journalists from playing their key role in society.