Round table on "Efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights"
Presentations
Session 1: Ensuring coordination/cooperation amongst national actors, in particular at governmental level: best practice and challenges faced by member states
- Experience of Greece: "Experience of setting-up of the mechanism concerning the execution of the European Court’s judgments and related challenges" by Ms Vasileia Pelekou, Legal Advisor, State’s Legal Council, Greece
- Experience of Georgia: "Experience of setting-up of the domestic mechanism concerning the execution of the European Court’s judgments and related challenges" by Mr Levan Meskhoradze, Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, Georgia
- Experience of Poland: "Mechanisms to ensure coordination amongst the governmental bodies involved in the execution of the Court’s judgments" by Mr Jakub Wołąsiewicz, Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Poland
- Experience of Serbia: "Coordination mechanisms with respect to the execution of the Court’s judgments revealing complex problems" by Mr Slavoljub Carić, Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, Serbia
Session 2: Ensuring coordination/cooperation amongst national actors, with special emphasis on federal states, relations with national parliaments and the Constitutional Courts: best practice and challenges faced by member states
- Experience of The Netherlands: "Coordination mechanism in the Netherlands, including reporting practice to Parliament" by Ms Anna Lodeweges, Policy Coordinator, Ministry of Security and Justice, The Netherlands
- Experience of the United Kingdom: "Coordination of the execution of the Court’s judgments, including the role of Parliament of the United Kingdom in external oversight of the execution process" by Mr Laurence Fiddler, Head of Domestic Human Rights Policy, Ministry of Justice, the United Kingdom
- Experience of Germany: "Mechanisms to coordinate the execution of the European Court’s judgments in the Federal state, including the role of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany in this respect" by Mr Danny Polk, Administrative Officer, Federal Ministry of Justice, Germany
- Experience of Bosnia and Herzegovina: "Coordination mechanisms with respect to the execution of the European Court’s judgments in Bosnia and Herzegovina" by Ms Belma Skalonjić, Assistant Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Experience of the Russian Federation: "Experience of coordinating the execution of the Court’s judgments against the Russian Federation" by Ms Natalia Zyabkina, First Deputy Head of the Office of the Representative of the Russian Federation before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, the Russian Federation
Session 3: Ensuring adequate dissemination of the Court’s judgments and decisions/resolutions from the Committee of Ministers and, where necessary, translation
- Experience of Romania: "Cooperation with other actors to ensure translation and dissemination of the European Court’s case-law and documents of the Committee of Ministers" by Ms Irina Cambrea, Government Co-Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Romania
- Experience of the Slovak Republic: "Awareness-raising and dissemination of the Court’s case-law amongst the authorities and the judiciary, including the Constitutional Court" by Ms Marica Pirošíková, Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, the Slovak Republic
- Experience of Norway: "Experience of Norway of ensuring translation and dissemination of the Court’s case-law and other relevant documents" by Mr Anders Narvestad, Adviser, Ministry of Justice and Police, Norway
Session 4: Challenges relating to the preparation of action plans/reports and their implementation at the national/local level
- Experience of Albania: "Experience of drawing up the action plan on cases relating to property restitution/compensation" by Ms Ledina Mandija, General State Advocate, Ministry of Justice, Albania
- Experience of Austria: "Mechanisms to ensure efficient preparation of action plans" by Ms Elisabeth Handl-Petz, Legal Advisor, Federal Chancellery, Austria
- Experience of Lithuania: "Experience of drawing up of action plans in respect of cases revealing complex problems, with particular focus on the implementation of the judgment of Paksas v. Lithuania" by Ms Karolina Bubnytè-Montvydienè, Head of the Division of the Representation before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, Lithuania
- Experience of Moldova: "Experience of drawing up of the action plan in respect of the pilot judgment Olaru v. Moldova and the execution measures taken" by Mr Lilian Apostol, Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, Moldova
- Experience of Romania: "Process of drawing up the action plan in respect of the pilot judgment Maria Atanasiu and others v. Romania and its implementation" by Ms Irina Cambrea, Government Co-Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Romania
