Meltex Ltd and Mesrop Movsesyan v. Armenia | 2008

Better licensing procedure for TV stations

The sheer scale of the public protest . . . persuaded us that we had a duty to continue to operate as a news organisation...

Mesrop Movsesyan, A1+'s founder, quoted on the BBC

 

Background

A1+ was one of Armenia’s leading independent TV channels before it was abruptly taken off the air in 2002.

In 2000 and 2001, the government had brought in new broadcasting rules, involving the creation of a new licensing procedure. This required TV companies to bid for operating licences in an open competition. A newly created regulator would assess the bids.

A1+’s parent company, Meltex Ltd, bid for a new licence but lost out to a competitor. As a result, A1+ stopped broadcasting on 25 April 2002.

Meltex made six more bids for licences but lost out each time.

Mesrop Movsesyan, A1+’s founder, wanted answers. He kept writing to the regulator demanding a full explanation why Meltex had consistently been denied a licence. Instead, he received standard replies which told him little.

Meltex took legal action against the regulator. However, an Armenian court dismissed the company’s complaints in 2004, saying it had been given “grounds and reasons” for the refusal of its bids.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court ruled that Armenia had breached Meltex’s freedom of expression because the regulator gave no reasons for denying the company a broadcasting licence. This left the licensing procedure open to abuse.

…the licensing authority . . . gave no reasons whatsoever for its decisions repeatedly denying [Meltex] a broadcasting licence.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, September 2008

Follow-up

 

The decision of the Court is a victory for freedom of expression.

Terry Davis, Secretary General of the Council of Europe (2004-2009), quoted in a Council of Europe press release

 

Armenia changed its broadcasting law in June 2010. The new law said that the regulator’s decisions “shall be properly substantiated and reasoned".

It was made clear that the law should be interpreted in line with the European Convention on Human Rights and the European court’s judgment in Meltex’s case.

Meltex made another bid for a broadcasting licence in 2010 but did not win.

Themes:

Соответствующие примеры

Необоснованный запрет на мирную демонстрацию привел к реформам по защите свободы собраний

Правозащитная НПО запланировала марш в Ереване в память о человеке, который умер во время содержания под стражей в полиции. Мэрия запретила этот марш. Страсбургский суд постановил, что данный запрет не был должным образом обоснован, что нарушило право НПО на свободу собраний. После запрета были проведены реформы, направленные на защиту права на проведение публичных демонстраций в Армении.

Read more

Новые правила по защите плюрализма СМИ после того, как компании помешали вести вещание

В основном, на итальянском телевидении транслировалось небольшое количество каналов, при этом не было большого многообразия форм собственности. Когда «Чентро Эуропа 7» попыталась создать новые каналы, им было отказано в доступе к частотам вещания. Компания пожаловалась в Страсбургский суд на то, что власти поддерживают концентрацию власти СМИ в Италии. Дело привело к принятию новых правил о...

Read more