Правосудие переходного периода и защита прав человека в Европе

В нескольких регионах и странах Европы все еще идут кровопролитные конфликты и существуют диктатуры, мешающие множеству европейцев в полной мере осуществлять права человека и пользоваться плодами демократии и верховенства права. Сохраняющаяся нестабильность, углубляющиеся разногласия, нехватка ресурсов и отсутствие работающих институтов превращают примирение и восстановление мира в пострадавшем обществе в сложнейшую задачу для государств, которым приходится ее решать.

Хотя универсальный рецепт для исправления прошлых и настоящих грубейших нарушений прав человека отсутствует, как показывает история, долгосрочные решения достигаются только при условии, что в их основе лежат правосудие, возмещение вреда, установление истины и гарантии неповторения случившегося.

Каким бы ни был набор мер правосудия переходного периода, он должен отвечать европейским стандартам в области прав человека, в частности тем, которые сформулированы в Европейской конвенции по правам человека и в прецедентах Страсбургского суда.

Посещая страны и ведя непрерывный диалог с национальными властями и гражданским обществом, Комиссар отмечает достигнутый прогресс. Он также указывает на остающиеся проблемы и консультирует государства-члены касательно того, как обеспечить соблюдение прав человека в контексте процессов правосудия переходного периода.

Resources

Selected recent case-law of the European Court of Human Rights
  • Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania – Grand Chamber judgment of 20 October 2015 about the foreseeability of a conviction for genocide for the killing of two Lithuanian partisans in 1953
  • Perinçek v. Switzerland – Grand Chamber judgment of 15 October 2015 concerning a criminal conviction for statements made about the massacre and deportation of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire in 1915 (as well as reviewing the Court’s case-law concerning Holocaust denial)
  • Ališić and others v. BiH, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” - Grand Chamber final judgment of 16 July 2014, concerning non-payment of ‘old savings’ accounts denominated in foreign currency
  • Zornić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina - judgment of 15 July 2014, concerning ineligibility to stand for certain elections of an applicant who did not declare affiliation with any of the three "constituent people" of Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Jelić v. Croatia - jugment of 12 June 2014, concerning no adequate investigation into the death of husband killed by the Croatian police
  • Marguš v. Croatia - final judgment of 27 May 2014, concerning the procedings brought against a commander in the Croatian army for the murder and serious wounding of civilians in 1991 during the war in Croatia
  • Gürtekin and Others v. Cyprus, inadmissibility decision of 11 March 2014 about the Cyprus authorities’ decision to close a fresh investigation into killings carried out during intercommunal conflicts in Cyprus in 1963-1964
  • Maktouf and Damjanović v. BiH - Grand Chamber judgment of 18 July 2013, concerning the retroactive application of criminal law laying down heavier sentences for wartime crimes than the law in force when the crimes were committed
  • Kurić and others v. Slovenia - Grand Chamber judgment of 26 June 2012, concerning the ‘erased' persons
  • Janowiec and others v. Russia - Grand Chamber judgment of 21 October 2013, concerning missing persons in the Katyn case
  • Palić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina - judgment of 15 February 2011, concerning a state's procedural obligation to investigate into a case of missing person
  • Jularić v. Croatia - judgment of 20 January 2011, concerning inadequate and ineffective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the killing of the applicant's husband
  • Skendžić and Krznarić v. Croatia - judgment of 20 January 2011, concerning ineffectiveness and the lack of independence of the authorities involved in investigating the disappearance of the applicants' close relative
  • Đokić v. BiH - final judgment of 4 October 2010, concerning the right of the applicant, a former member of the armed forces of the former Yugoslavia, to regain the possession and register the ownership of his pre-war apartment in the Federation of BiH
  • Čolic and others v. BIH - final judgment of 28 June 2010, concerning the non-enforcement of final domestic court decisions ordering payment of war damages
  • Kononov v. Latvia – Grand Chamber judgment of 17 May 2010 about a conviction under legislation introduced in 1993 for war crimes committed during the Second World War
  • Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina - Grand Chamber judgment of 22 December 2009, concerning the applicants' ineligibility to stand for election to the House of Peoples and the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the ground of their Roma and Jewish origin
  • Radanović v. Croatia - final judgment of 21 March 2007, concerning the applicant’s right to her property which was allocated for use to another person during the war in Croatia
  • Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia – decisions of 17 January 2006 about criminal convictions for crimes against humanity for participation in 1949 deportations from occupied Estonia to remote areas of the Soviet Union
Documents by the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers 
PACE resolutions and recommendations relating to the post-conflict justice 
Council of Europe treaties 

Внешние ресурсы

UN treaty bodies jurisprudence

  • UN Human Rights Committee, Communication No 1510/2006, Dušan Vojnovic v. Croatia, Views of 30/03/2009 (case concerning proceedings in relation with the termination of the author's specially protected tenancy)
  • International Court of Justice (ICJ), judgment of 26 February 2007 on the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

* Все упоминания Косово, будь то в контексте территории, институтов или населения, следует трактовать в полном соответствии с резолюцией 1244 (1999) Совета Безопасности ООН без ущерба для статуса Косово.