Назад

Чего мы достигли, где остались пробелы и какие положительные примеры мы можем выделить?

Речь
Париж 26/09/2019
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page
  • Imprimer en PDF

Двадцать пять лет назад мой родной город Сараево собирался пережить свой 905-й день осады, которая длилась 1425 дней и стала самой долгой осадой столицы в истории современной войны. Город, в котором всего 10 лет до этих событий проходили Олимпийские игры и который представлялся образцом мирного сосуществования, был жестоко разрушен бомбами, этнической и религиозной ненавистью. Жестокость войны в бывшей Югославии была знакома главам государств и правительств, которые встретились на первом саммите Совета Европы в Вене в 1993 году. Эта война была предостережением на фоне энтузиазма в Европе, вызванного падением железного занавеса. Казалось, объединение побеждает разделения. Но война и зверства, происходившие в бывшей Югославии, были ярким напоминанием о том, что разрушительные силы нетерпимости и расизма все еще живы и разрушают человеческие жизни.

Далее на английском языке.

Today our European family is bigger, freer and more democratic. We have built institutions and drafted legislation to combat those destructive powers. But the struggle for equality is far from over. On the contrary: the very serious concerns that prompted the Heads of State and Government to pave the way for the establishment of ECRI are remarkably similar to those we have today. Aggressive nationalism, ethnocentrism, economic difficulties and an unfair distribution of efforts to protect refugees are eroding social cohesion and fostering tensions and xenophobia today as they were 25 years ago.

ECRI’s work has helped to lay a solid legal and institutional foundation to help combat racism, xenophobia and intolerance. We should recognise the advances that its work has brought to our society. At the same time, we must acknowledge that this progress did not benefit everyone in the same way. There remain great discrepancies from country to country as well as within any single country.

Laws remain a scrap of paper if they are not fully implemented. Worse, they can be adjusted to match political calculations rather than the public good. Therefore, the challenge today is to ensure that the laws and standards are implemented and the institutions that we created actually function. And these challenges are political more than institutional.

If political leaders themselves ignore anti-discrimination laws and the values and principles that gave birth to them, we will not make progress. Regrettably, during my work in the past year, I have observed that several governments and parliaments are departing from agreed standards and are withdrawing into dangerous nationalistic ideas. They are going down a nationalistic route, not only in words, but also in deeds. As we meet today, the toxic, irresponsible and cynical nationalistic discourse that some political leaders hold in Europe is undercutting social cohesion and the fragile fabric of our democracies. This is a very dangerous path that fosters increasingly intolerant attitudes and attempts to pit parts of society against one another, and to scapegoat various social groups, minorities, or professions. This is often accompanied by weakening democratic institutions, limiting civil society freedoms, and divisive language designed to stigmatise the “Other”. The most affected by this situation are those who have always been the preferred targets of demagogues: Jews, Muslims, Roma, foreigners and LGBTI people. I see a continuity between past and contemporary hate, racism and extremism. Practices such as chasing Roma out of their homes, marginalising persons with disability, assaulting LGBTI people, ethnic profiling and hate speech are all reminiscent of dark periods of Europe’s history.

Over the past two decades, ECRI’s reports have consistently warned against rising extremism, racism and intolerance in Europe. By now we should have learned that dehumanising the Other only paves the way to further violence and threatens society’s well-being. Yet, we still have a lot of work to do. Today’s event is an important occasion to reaffirm that racism is an enemy of human rights and that ECRI represents a crucial institution to protect human dignity. Today’s event must also be the start of a renewed commitment to confront the deeply-rooted prejudices, stereotypes and myths that still oppress the lives of too many human beings in Europe.

ECRI stems from the vision, sensitivity and humanity of some giants of our common European history. Their times were not easier than ours. Our task is not bigger than theirs. It is now our turn to give renewed impetus to the ambition of establishing a “democratic and pluralist society respecting the equal dignity of all human beings”.