B.V. v. Belgium |2017

Better protection for victims of sexual violence after police fail to properly investigate rape allegation

. . . the investigation cannot . . . be considered to have been conducted in a serious and thorough manner.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, May 2017

Background 

In 1998, B.V. told her managers that a work colleague had raped and sexually assaulted her on several occasions. They referred her to a unit for sexual harassment in the workplace.

B.V. later went to the police, who interviewed the man she had accused. Investigators asked a psychology student, who was working as an intern, to give an opinion on B.V.’s mental state.

The police decided not to take B.V.’s complaint further - but they did not tell her.

Several years later B.V. learned, by chance, that the police had not followed up her complaint. She demanded that the authorities act. 

Taking her case to an investigative judge, B.V. tried for years to have her claims properly examined, but few steps were taken to determine what had happened. Her case was finally dropped in 2008.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court found that the Belgian authorities’ investigation into B.V.’s allegations had not been conducted in a serious or thorough way, which was in breach of her rights.

The investigators at the time limited themselves to the opinion of a student trainee, which does not attest to seriousness in the collection and treatment of the complaint.

 Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, May 2017 

Follow-up 

Since the time of this case, Belgium has taken many steps to better respond to allegations of gender-based violence, including complaints of sexual violence: 

  • The authorities have implemented successive national action plans to ensure that police and the justice system respond quickly and appropriately to sexual violence, including crimes perpetrated within the workplace. A proposed 2021-2025 plan foresees the expansion of specialist sexual violence management centres to provide help to victims. 
  • Improved training has been provided to police and the judiciary on how to treat victims of sexual violence and handle their complaints. 
  • In 2016, Belgium ratified the Council of Europe convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (“Istanbul Convention”). 
Themes:

Related examples

The landmark judgment that inspired Europe to act on violence against women

Nahide Opuz was abused by her husband for years. The violence tragically led to the murder of her mother. The European court ruled that Turkey had not done enough to protect Nahide and her mother, and, for the first time ever, that gender-based violence is a form of discrimination. The judgment helped to inspire international efforts to prevent and combat violence against women.

Read more

Forced sterilisation of Roma woman leads to stricter rules on consent to treatment

V.C. was a victim of forced sterilisation, a practice that persisted in Slovakia for decades, disproportionately affecting Roma women. The European court ruled that the procedure, carried out whilst V.C. was giving birth, amounted to ill-treatment. Slovakia brought in new rules on patients’ consent to treatment after it emerged that many other Roma women had been unlawfully sterilised.

Read more

Justice for family of murdered mother and daughter

M.T. and her infant daughter, V.T., were shot dead by a man who had just been released from prison after making violent threats against them. M.T. and V.T.’s family believed that the authorities had not done enough to protect them. The European court agreed. Its judgment in their case led Croatia to strengthen protections for victims of domestic violence.

Read more