On 26 March, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in the D.M. v. Sweden case, which concerned the applicant’s removal order from Sweden to Afghanistan following his unsuccessful applications for asylum. He complained that his removal would be in breach of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention and that the domestic proceedings had not complied with the standards required under those Articles, taken alone or in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention. The judgment is available here: D.M. v. Sweden .