Back

There must be proper rules on detention without trial

Toniolo v. San Marino and Italy  | 2012

There must be proper rules on detention without trial

Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

Opening of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Background

Giuseppe Toniolo was detained in San Marino, on suspicion of financial wrongdoing. He was due to be extradited to Italy. Mr Toniolo claimed that he had done nothing wrong. He also claimed that his detention was unnecessary, given that he was not dangerous and there was no risk of him absconding.

Nevertheless, Mr Toniolo spent five weeks in detention in San Marino. According to him, he had no access to his lawyers, and was not properly heard by a court. Mr Toniolo was eventually extradited to Italy, where he was ultimately released.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The Strasbourg court found that there was no law in San Marino which clearly stated when or why detention would be necessary for someone awaiting extradition. This meant that Mr Toniolo could be detained arbitrarily, and could not effectively make a claim to be released. This violated his right to liberty.

Follow-up

In 2014 a comprehensive new law set out the rules which must be followed for extradition or detention cases, and gave people an opportunity to bring legal challenges against these measures.


Related examples

Illegal detention of innocent man and reforms to protect the right to liberty

Sergey Solovyev lost three years of his life in a cell, after being falsely accused of manslaughter. At one point his detention was extended without an order from a judge and contrary to Russian law. The European court ruled that Mr Solvyev’s right to liberty had been breached. Russia changed its criminal laws to prevent unlawful detention orders and protect the right to liberty.

Read more

Man given 3 months’ detention for a crime he didn’t commit - and reforms to protect the right to liberty

Locked in a windowless cell, I. I. spent 3 months in pre-trial detention for a crime he did not commit. After he developed various illnesses, the charges against I.I. were dropped because of a lack of evidence and he was released. Following a series of similar cases, the law in Bulgaria was changed to protect people’s right to liberty.

Read more

Arbitrary detention in psychiatric hospital leads to reforms to protect liberty

Frits Winterwerp was detained in a psychiatric hospital. He said that he was not mentally ill and he should be released. However, he was repeatedly prevented from making his case in the Dutch courts, which kept extending his detention without hearing from him. The European court ruled this had violated his right to liberty. Reforms were made to protect people in Mr Winterwerp’s situation.

Read more

Legal reforms after innocent hotel director was jailed for 14 months without proper evidence

Hotel director Juozas Jėčius was held for over 14 months whilst awaiting trial for murder. However, there had never been any proper evidence against him, and he was acquitted at trial. The Strasbourg court ruled that Mr Jėčius’ incarceration had violated his right to liberty. Following the Court’s judgment, new measures were introduced to help avoid unjustified detention.

Read more

Reforms to prevent detention without a court’s permission

Allar Harkmann was arrested and detained, without a court hearing his case or examining the legality of his detention. He was only released after 15 days. The Strasbourg court ruled that the failure to have Mr Harkmann’s detention promptly reviewed by a judge, and the lack of any opportunity for him to obtain compensation, had violated his right to liberty.

Read more

Woman’s 4-year detention without trial leads to freedom protections

Josette Prencipe was in her mid-sixties when she was arrested and detained for almost 4 years, without facing trial. She was accused of making illegal bank transfers. The Strasbourg court ruled that the authorities had breached Mrs Prencipe’s right to liberty. The case triggered a series of reforms, including a new time limit on pre-trial detention.

Read more

Changes to legal procedures after detainee denied the opportunity to make his case in court

Peter Frommelt asked to be released whilst awaiting trial for financial crimes. When this was considered on appeal, neither he nor his lawyer were allowed to make any legal arguments. The Strasbourg court ruled that this had been unfair. The procedures were changed, allowing people to make comments to a court in such circumstances.

Read more