Back

Reforms after children were taken away from their parents because they were poor

Wallová and Walla v. the Czech Republic  | 2006

Reforms after children were taken away from their parents because they were poor

The court considers that the reasons given by the national authorities and courts ... were not sufficient to justify this serious interference with the applicants' family life

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, 26th October 2006 - © Photo Aktualne.cz

Background

Emílie Wallová and Jaroslav Walla had five children. The authorities took the children away and placed them in children’s homes, saying that the parents did not have enough money to look after them properly.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The court said that separating a family is a drastic measure that should only be applied in the most serious of cases. The Czech authorities should have used other measures, such as giving the parents advice on how to improve their situation. However, no serious efforts were made to help the parents. Taking the children away in such circumstances had breached the parents’ right to family life.

Follow-up

New legislation introduced a ban on putting children in institutional care just because of the financial situation of their parents. Legal changes also introduced new methods for social workers, and required courts to always consider less severe alternatives to institutional care. National strategies were adopted to help better support children at risk and improve the care for vulnerable children.


Related examples

Reforms made following the inhuman treatment of a four-year-old girl

When she was four years old, Tabitha Mitunga was detained by the Belgian authorities for almost two months – without family, friends, or anybody assigned to look after her. She suffered psychological damage and the Strasbourg court ruled that her rights had been violated. Her case highlighted the need for better protections for unaccompanied children in Belgium and led to substantial reforms.

Read more

Woman wins landmark case for the rights of single mothers and their children

Paula Marckx was unmarried when she had a baby girl. Paula was shocked to discover that, because she was single, her child would not be recognised as being hers unless she went through a legal process. Even after this, her daughter would have a reduced legal status and would not inherit from her. The European court ruled this violated their right to family life – leading to a change to Belgian...

Read more

Reforms to protect family life after a father was separated from his daughter

When Teuvo Hokkanen’s wife died he temporarily allowed her parents to look after his daughter, Sini. The grandparents then refused to return Sini or to let Teuvo see her. The Finnish courts ordered regular meetings to take place between Teuvo and his daughter, but the authorities failed to enforce that order. The European court ruled that this had violated Teuvo’s right to family life.

Read more

Justice for thousands of “erased” people after 20 years without rights

In February 1992, 25,671 people in Slovenia were automatically stripped of their right to live there. Many people – including Ana Mezga - had their papers taken away, were evicted from their homes, could not work, lost personal possessions or had their families broken apart. The law was changed and a compensation scheme set up after a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights.

Read more

Vulnerable child was denied a full adoption because her new mother was single

With the help of an international agency, Jeanne Wagner adopted a child from an orphanage in Peru. However, after they travelled back to Europe, the Luxembourg courts refused to recognise the full adoption because Jeanne was not married. The European court ruled that this was unfair and violated the right to family life. The adoption was recognised and the ban on single-parent adoption was ended.

Read more

A mother’s struggle to be with her children leads to better protection for family life

M.D. lost custody of her two children after the authorities found that her former partner had been beating them and she had not protected them. M.D. then ended her relationship with the abusive partner and tried to get her children back. However, under Maltese law she had lost custody of the children forever, and she had no way to challenge this in the national courts.

Read more

Justice for elderly widow forced to change her name by the government

Tiborné Daróczy was 71 years old when the government made her change the name - even though she she had used it for fifty years. Mrs Daróczy saw her name as a strong link to her late husband. She did not want to be forced to change it. The European court ruled in her favour and the Hungarian authorities then allowed Mrs Daróczy to keep her old name.

Read more

Fair custody rights for fathers of children born out of marriage

Under Austrian law, custody of a child born out of marriage was automatically given to the mother, with few exceptions. Meanwhile, custody of children born within marriage was decided according to the child’s best interests. At the Strasbourg court, Mr Sporer successfully argued that this was unfair – leading to a change in Austrian law.

Read more

Justice for a mother who lost custody of her child

Verica Šobota-Gajić was given custody of her children after her relationship ended. However, her former husband took their son away. Due to the authorities’ inaction, Ms Šobota-Gajić only regained custody 6 years later. The case led to reforms to make sure the right people have custody of a child.

Read more

Child unable to discover identity of her father for 5 years – and reforms to protect children’s rights

A child was born outside of marriage. The mother asked the courts to establish who the father was. Due to legal delays and the father’s refusals to have a DNA test, the case lasted over 5 years. The Strasbourg court ruled that children’s rights were not properly protected. Laws were changed to help prevent the problem from happening again.

Read more