Back

Legal standards changed after gay father was denied custody of his child

Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal  | 1999

Legal standards changed after gay father was denied custody of his child

The Court of Appeal made a distinction based on considerations regarding the applicant’s sexual orientation, a distinction which is not acceptable under the convention

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, 21st December 1999

Background

A lower court granted João Salgueiro da Silva Mouta custody of his daughter, after he and his wife got divorced. However, his former wife abducted the child and refused to let the girl see her father.

When the Court of Appeal examined the case, it gave custody to the mother rather than Mr Salgueiro da Silva Mouta. One of the reasons given was that Mr Salgueiro da Silva Mouta was gay – and homosexuality was an abnormality that children should not be exposed to when growing up.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The court found that Mr Salgueiro da Silva Mouta’s homosexuality had been decisive in the authorities’ refusal to grant him custody. This had been discriminatory, with no proper justification.

Follow-up

The Portuguese courts re-examined the case without taking into consideration the applicant’s homosexuality.

Following the Strasbourg court’s judgment, Portuguese courts are no longer able to take the sexual orientation of a parent into account when deciding on custody rights.

Additional information


Related examples

Man’s struggle leads to the legalisation of homosexuality in Ireland

David Norris suffered from anxiety attacks and depression after realising that any open expression of his homosexuality could lead to a criminal prosecution. The Strasbourg court ruled that the criminalisation of his sexuality breached his basic rights. In 1993, this led to the full legalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults under Irish law.

Read more

Decriminalisation of homosexuality after architect wins case in Strasbourg

For decades, Cypriot law criminalised homosexual relationships between men. Alecos Modinos suffered from strain, apprehension and fear of prosecution due to his relationship with another man. The European court ruled that the criminalisation of Alecos’ sexuality violated his basic rights to a private life. In 1998, Cyprus decriminalised homosexual relationships.

Read more

Justice for a victim of domestic violence in Romania

Bruised and beaten, Angelica Bălșan suffered eight assaults from her husband and sustained injuries that required up to ten days of medical care. She made many complaints to the authorities, but they took no proper steps to protect her. The European court held that Ms Bălșan had been inadequately protected against the abuse – leading to ongoing reforms to combat domestic violence in Romania.

Read more

Reform of gun laws after police shoot dead unarmed men

Two 21-year-olds absconded from military service and went to see their grandmother. When military police arrived, the men were unarmed and non-violent - and tried to run away. Nevertheless, they were shot dead. The Strasbourg court ruled that the military police had used grossly excessive force. This case, and others, led to changes in the rules on the authorities’ use of firearms.

Read more

Failure to investigate attack on Roma settlement leads to local reforms

All of the Roma inhabitants of a village had their houses burnt down by other locals. The authorities were warned, but refused to intervene. After the attack, the authorities did not investigate properly and the courts failed to give the victims a fair trial. Their application to Strasbourg led to compensation and local programmes to combat discrimination and exclusion.

Read more

Reforms introduced after police failed to properly investigate a racist attack

One night in the village of Gánovce-Filice, Roma villagers were beaten with baseball bats and iron bars by other locals. The Strasbourg court ruled that the authorities failed to properly investigate, or punish those responsible. The case was re-opened and legal changes were made to help the authorities’ tackle racist crimes.

Read more

Better protections for peaceful demonstrations after protest was banned

An NGO organised a series of demonstrations in Warsaw, to highlight discrimination against women and minorities. The gatherings were banned, after the city’s mayor said that he was against them because they included support for homosexual rights. The Strasbourg court ruled that the ban violated the right to public assembly. This led to changes to Polish law to protect the right to protest.

Read more

Legal battle leads to stronger transgender rights

Miss B was registered as a man at birth. Later she adopted female behaviour, underwent feminising hormone therapy, and had genital surgery. However, the authorities refused to register her as a woman – causing her daily problems. The Strasbourg court ruled that her fundamental rights had been violated. French law was changed to properly recognise the identity of post-operative transgender.

Read more

Legal aid system introduced after woman suffering from domestic violence was unable to access the courts

Mrs Airey wanted to be legally separated from her husband, who was allegedly a violent alcoholic. However, there was no legal aid and she could not afford the lawyers’ fees. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the lack of legal aid effectively denied Mrs Airey access to a court, breaching her basic rights. Legal aid for such cases was introduced in Ireland in the following year.

Read more