Eon v. France  | 2013

Reforms made after man convicted for waving a satirical placard

It is astonishing that this man was arrested and charged.

Dominique Noguères, Hervé Eon's lawyer, reported by Ouest France - © Photo: Bati Raporu

Background

In February 2008 President Sarkozy said the words “Casse toi pov’con” (“Get lost, you sad prick”) to a farmer who had refused to shake his hand. The phrase circulated widely on the internet and became a slogan in demonstrations.

In August 2008 Hervé Eon waved a placard at Sarkozy, bearing the words “Casse toi pov’con”. Hervé was convicted of insulting the President of France and given a suspended fine.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

Hervé Eon had been prosecuted and convicted for waving a satirical placard. The court ruled that this had violated his right to free speech. 

Follow-up

In August 2013 the offence of insulting the President of France was abolished. Hervé was able to reopen the criminal proceedings that were brought against him.

Themes:

Related examples

Criminal convictions for urging Israel goods boycott cancelled

Eleven people were convicted for calling for a boycott of Israeli goods in solidarity with Palestine. According to the European court, the French courts had not established why these criminal convictions were “necessary in a democratic society”. The European court’s judgment led to the cancellation of the protestors’ convictions and greater freedom to support boycotts for political reasons.

Read more

Man’s struggle leads to the legalisation of homosexuality in Ireland

David Norris suffered from anxiety attacks and depression after realising that any open expression of his homosexuality could lead to a criminal prosecution. The European court ruled that the criminalisation of his sexuality breached his basic rights. In 1993, this led to the full legalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults under Irish law.

Read more

Nurse compensated after being fired for whistleblowing

Brigitte Heinisch was a geriatric nurse. She claimed that practices in the old people’s home where she worked were putting patients at risk. After she made her allegations public, she was fired. Yet, the German courts found that her dismissal was lawful - so Mrs Heinisch took her case to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Her case was then re-opened and she won compensation.

Read more