Ajdarić v. Croatia  | 2011

Fair trial reforms after innocent man was sentenced to 40 years in jail

I left prison the day before my 60th birthday. The next day my daughter wished me happy birthday.
I said to her: "Not today, that was yesterday".
She looks at me in wonder and says: "But today is February 7th".
"Yes", I say, "but yesterday, when I was released from prison, I was born again."

Neđo Ajdarić, quoted in Jutarnji Vijesti, February 2013 - © Photo Nezavisne


Neđo Ajdarić was 52 when he was given an unfair trial, wrongly convicted of three murders, and sentenced to 40 years in prison.

There had been no evidence whatsoever linking Mr Ajdarić to the crime, until a prisoner suffering from emotional instability and histrionic personality disorder said that he had heard Mr Ajdarić and another man talking about it. Despite the existence of obvious inconsistencies in the prisoner’s evidence, the prisoner’s unbalanced mental state, and the lack of any other information linking Mr Ajdarić to the crime, the trial court convicted him.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court noted that the prisoner had suffered from histrionic personality disorder and that he had been contradicted by other witnesses. It said that his evidence should not have been capable of convicting Mr Ajdarić. In these circumstances, the proceedings against Mr Ajdarić had breached his right to a fair trial.


The Constitutional Court changed its case law to highlight the need for courts to properly examine evidence in trials, and for the arguments of the accused to be properly considered.

Mr Ajdarić’s case was re-opened and he was released.


Related examples

Justice for the family of asbestos poisoning victim

Hans Moor was exposed to asbestos during his work in the 1960s and 70s. This gave him cancer, which was diagnosed in 2004. Hans Moor died in 2005, aged 58. Just before his death, Mr Moor had brought a claim for damages against his former employer for failing to take precautions against exposure to asbestos. The claim was continued by his wife and children.

Read more

Legal aid system introduced after woman suffering from domestic violence was unable to access the courts

Mrs Airey wanted to be legally separated from her husband, who was allegedly a violent alcoholic. However, there was no legal aid and she could not afford the lawyers’ fees. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the lack of legal aid effectively denied Mrs Airey access to a court, breaching her basic rights. Legal aid for such cases was introduced in Ireland in the following year.

Read more

Reforms introduced after failure to pay compensation to Chernobyl rescue worker

Anatoliy Burdov was exposed to radiation whilst working on the emergency response to the Chernobyl disaster. He was entitled to certain social benefits, but the authorities refused to pay - even when ordered to do so by Russian courts. The European court said that this violated Mr Burdov’s rights. As a result, reforms were introduced to improve the enforcement of judgments.

Read more