Back Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary

Comparative analysis on confidential counselling for judges and for public prosecutors presented to the Serbian judiciary

Members of the Ethics Committees of the Serbian High Judicial Council and the State Prosecutorial Council were presented with the Analysis of systems of confidential counselling on ethical matters for judges and for public prosecutors. The Analysis contains a set of recommendations for policymakers on steps to be taken to introduce confidential counselling into Serbian judiciary.

The Council of Europe Group of States against Corruption GRECO, in the 4th Evaluation Round which deals with corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors, made a recommendation to Serbian authorities that confidential counselling within the judiciary be provided for all categories of judges and public prosecutors. In that sense, the joint European Union/Council of Europe action “Strengthening independence and accountability of the judiciary” has put on disposal to both Councils the comparative analysis which examines the confidential counselling systems in a number of Council of Europe member-states, and beyond, in the US and the countries of Latin America. Drafting of the Analysis also included interviews with relevant stakeholders, including professional associations of judges and public prosecutors.

The key issues addressed by the analysis concern the positioning of the confidential counselling mechanism within the justiciary, composition and appointment procedure of confidential counsellors, methods of work and the role of already existing Ethics Committees.

The representatives of both Ethics Committees were impressed with the findings and agreed to formulate proposals for future steps to be taken by the High Judicial Council and the State Prosecutorial Council in order to ensure that confidential counselling on ethical matters becomes embedded in the Serbian judiciary. It was also agreed for these steps to be closely accompanied by the action.

The authors of the analysis are judge José Manuel Duro Mateus Cardoso of the Appellate Court in Lisbon, a team of experts of the Belgrade-based Institute for Comparative Law and Mirjana Dokmanovic, who provided advice on antidiscrimination measures to be considered.

The meeting was held under the action “Strengthening independence and accountability of the judiciary” which is part of the “Horizontal Facility for the Western Balkans and Turkey 2019-2022”, a co-operation initiative of the European Union and the Council of Europe, which aims at assisting beneficiaries in the Western Balkans region and Turkey to comply with the Council of Europe standards and European Union acquis in the framework of the enlargement process, where relevant.

Belgrade 14 July 2021
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page

Strengthening independence and accountability of the judiciary

 

What is the goal?


► building the capacities of judges, prosecutors, judicial and prosecutorial assistants to detect and counter risks of undue influence
► reinforcing internal mechanisms, rules and procedures within the High Judicial Council (HJC) and the State Prosecutorial Council (SPC) to guarantee judicial and prosecutorial independence.


Who benefits from the Action?


► the High Judicial Council, the State Prosecutorial Council, the Judicial Academy and the Ministry of Justice
► court users will benefit from a more transparent and effective judiciary
► Serbian citizens will benefit from the judiciary that is more independent and accountable.


How will the Action work?


► through expert advice/opinions, round tables, expert meetings/working groups, training session, peer-to-peer discussions organised in co-operation with beneficiaries
► through preparing publications that will contribute to strengthening the independence and the accountability of the judiciary and of the prosecutorial service of the Republic of Serbia and to improving the public confidence in the judicial system.


What do we expect to achieve?


► The establishment of a fair and merit-based system of performance evaluation and career advancement of judicial professionals
► The enhancement of the co-operation and the information flow between the executive and the judiciary.


How much will it cost?


► The total budget of the Action is 750.000 EUR.
► The budget allocated to the overall Horizontal Facility programme amounts to ca. 41 Million EUR (85% funded by the European Union, 15% by the Council of Europe).


How to get more information?


► Directorate General I: Human Rights and Rule of Law https://www.coe.int/en/web/human-rights-rule-of-law
► Horizontal Facility website: https://pjp-eu.coe.int/en/web/horizontal-facility/home
► Marija Simić, Horizontal Facility Communication Officer, [email protected], +381 63 601 337
Besnik Baka, Horizontal Facility Communication Officer, [email protected], +355 69 217 8430

HORIZONTAL FACILITY II