Burdov v. Russia  | 2002 and 2009

Reforms introduced after failure to pay compensation to Chernobyl rescue worker

Once they heard about the decision of the European court, other survivors of Chernobyl took Anatoliy Burdov’s initiative.

Television report by 1st Channel (former ‘ORT’), Russia, 19th June 2002 - © Photo ПЕРВЫЙ КАНАЛ

Background

Anatoliy Burdov worked on the emergency response to the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. He was exposed to a huge amount of radioactive emissions. He was entitled to various social benefits, but the authorities refused to pay them. Mr Burdov took the government to court in Russia and won. Yet even then the authorities did not pay up, refusing to follow the courts’ judgments.

Mr Burdov’s case reflected a wider problem in Russia. Large groups of vulnerable people could not get court judgments enforced. This meant that pensions, child allowances and compensation for injury during military service went unpaid.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court ruled on Mr Burdov’s situation twice. It found that he had been awarded compensation by Russian courts, but the government had failed to pay. This breached his right to a fair trial and his right to property. It reflected a wider problem of non-enforcement of court judgments in Russia, which called for significant reforms.

Follow-up

A wide range of measures were introduced between 2005 and 2011 to improve the enforcement of domestic court judgments. In line with rulings from the European court, in 2010 a system was created to provide compensation when judgments are not enforced for a long time.

Mr Burdov was paid the money he was owed. The authorities also paid money owed to claimants in over 5,000 other cases related to the Chernobyl disaster.   

Themes:

Related examples

Justice for the family of asbestos poisoning victim

Hans Moor was exposed to asbestos during his work in the 1960s and 70s. This gave him cancer, which was diagnosed in 2004. Hans Moor died in 2005, aged 58. Just before his death, Mr Moor had brought a claim for damages against his former employer for failing to take precautions against exposure to asbestos. The claim was continued by his wife and children.

Read more

Legal aid system introduced after woman suffering from domestic violence was unable to access the courts

Mrs Airey wanted to be legally separated from her husband, who was allegedly a violent alcoholic. However, there was no legal aid and she could not afford the lawyers’ fees. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the lack of legal aid effectively denied Mrs Airey access to a court, breaching her basic rights. Legal aid for such cases was introduced in Ireland in the following year.

Read more

Widow wins fight for husband’s property confiscated by the police

When Karol Rummi’s husband died, his valuable possessions were arbitrarily confiscated by the police. When Mrs Rummi tried to get them back, she was not allowed to make her case in court and told that the property now belonged to the state. The European court ruled that her right to property had been breached. She was compensated and the law was changed to prevent similar problems happening again.

Read more