At a glance
Home
About the Lisbon Network
Secretariat
  THE NETWORK
Bureau
Members and associated training programmes
The activities of the Lisbon Network have been integrated to the CEPEJ activities in January 2011. Click here to get to the new homepage.
Activities
Calendar
Plenary meeting reports
Bureau and working group meeting reports
Lisbon Network was talked about ...
Themis Competition
Documents
Network's strategy
Minimum Corpus of the CoE standards
  QUESTIONNAIRES
Structural and functional features of training institutions
Recruitment and initial training of magistrates
In-service training of magistrates
  OTHER DOCUMENTS
Experts' reports
Links
Coe bodies and international organisations
News from our patners
Forum
Discussion Forum
Users' guide of the Forum
Reset password

Questionnaire "C" on the role of training institutions as regards in-service training of judges and prosecutors
 

I. Please indicate the measures taken with a view to enabling judges and prosecutors to exercice their right to in-service training (for example, days of leave for that purpose, etc..);

II. Is in-service training of judges and prosecutors compulsory or optional?

III. If in-service training is not compulsory as a general rule, please specify if there are areas /and/or subject matters in which in-service training is nevertheless compulsory; If so, please give details;

IV. Is the judge or prosecutor free to choose the training actions in which he/she wishes to participate? Does he/she have to justify his/her choice? Is it possible for the judicial hierarchy and/or the training institution to oppose to the wish expressed by the judge or the prosecutor concerned and for what reason?

V. Please identify the committees and / or trainers that develop in-service training programmes and the authority that approves planning;

VI. Please give the following statistics: number of activities per year (if possible, please specify the average duration of activities); number of training hours offered per year per magistrate; budgetary resources;
 

Structural and functional features of training institutions


The role of training institutions in recruitment and initial training of judges and prosecutors


The role of training institutions as regards in-service training of judges and prosecutors

 
Analysis of the answers to the three questionnaires
VII. Please specify and describe the in-service training methods (seminars, workshops, traditional lectures, distance learning, audiovisuals);

VIII. Please give details about the training environment (dedicated structures, court buildings, conference centres in hotels and the like);

IX. What are the contents of training initiatives (role of cultural and social themes; role of ancillary sciences; management techniques);

X. What are the contents and the modalities of training to support change of functions?

XI. How is the assessment of programmes and methods done (questionnaires, interviews)?

XII. What are the modalities of the evaluation of trainers?

XIII. What is the impact of participation to training on participants' career?

XIV. Is there for each judge and prosecutor a file describing the in-service actions in which he/she participated?

XV. Are judges and public prosecutors offered individual training programmes concerning their personal professional development?
 

Replies to the questionnaire (last update: 30/10/07)


Albania
Armenia
Austria
Belgium
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Cyprus
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Hungary : National Council of Justice / Prosecutor
Iceland
Italy

Latvia
Luxembourg
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Montenegro
Romania
Russian Federation: Academy of the Office of the Prosecutor General
Slovakia
Spain
"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
Turkey
Ukraine

Observers
UNMIK