· publication of a synoptic study of the project’s themes and areas of work (see below);
· preparation of a manual for teachers and other professionals on the image of the other in history teaching in a multicultural society;
· networking of institutions that train history teachers and of resource centres.
i) "Multiple images, shared destinies? – Learning about history in a multicultural society"; ii) "Images of others and ourselves in the context of globalisation"; and iii) "The image of the other in conflict situations: learning different histories as a means of rebuilding trust".
i) Multiple images, shared destinies? – Learning about history in a multicultural society
Cultural diversity is nothing new in European societies. Nonetheless, a combination of sociological developments and increased awareness of the need to respect difference have radically changed both the context and the way that religious, linguistic and sociological differences are perceived.
The new context presents a challenge with regard to the way that we learn history. The task is to reflect the multiperspectivity and pluralism of historical perception and memory within a given society in the practice of history teaching, while avoiding a high degree of polarisation between particular differences and specificities.
In multicultural and democratic societies, history teaching could thus help to demonstrate that, far from there being a conflict between, on the one hand, people freely consenting to building a shared future and, on the other, ensuring that the histories of different groups are recognised, respected and generally made known, the one actually depends upon the other.
Clearly, many factors can constitute a basis for difference, for particular perceptions and thus for discrimination. In the current context it may be useful to look in particular at the two aspects described below.
· History teaching and images associated with different religions or world views
The Warsaw Action Plan, the Faro Declaration and the recent Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation on education and religion (Recommendation 1720 (2005)) have all stressed the need for what the Action Plan (in paragraph III, 6) called "intercultural and inter-faith dialogue, based on universal human rights, as a means of promoting awareness, understanding, reconciliation and tolerance, as well as preventing conflicts and ensuring integration and the cohesion of society".
Approaching the different images from a historical perspective, with particular emphasis on the ways in which they have influenced one another positively, is critically important for a clear understanding of contemporary situations.
A particular, though not exclusive, focus of attention should be the history of interaction between the different European cultures and religious traditions and the Muslim world, and the contemporary consequences of that interaction.
· Pluralism of origins and memory
The diversity of origins – European and non-European – and the plurality of memory found among the social groups that give European societies their cultural diversity extend beyond the religious dimension (while not necessarily excluding it) and are based on a range of factors including geographical and ethnic origin, historical events of special significance to particular groups, and lifestyle.
A specific function of the project will be to identify means whereby the practice of history teaching can reconcile shared (or supposedly shared) history with the particular histories of the social groups that comprise a multicultural society.
Activities
· 9-10 October 2006, experts’ seminar
· 18-19 June 2007, experts’ seminar
· 29-30 October 2007, Symposium
· October 2008, experts seminar (with ALECSO)
“The Image of the Muslim World in History learning in Europe : good practices”
ii) Images of others and ourselves in the context of globalisation
By enabling not only products, services and people but also information and data to circulate more quickly, globalisation has turned reciprocal image-building into a multi-layered phenomenon: "images of the other" are formed at every level from the local community to the state, the continent and the world.
These images are also changing more rapidly as a result of both globalisation and the development of information technology. While our perceptions of one another may never have been static, they evolve today at a steady pace that has no precedent.
Activities in this area will therefore explore the implications for history teaching of the following:
· recent changes in the way that Europeans see themselves, particularly since the end of the Cold War and the internal re-opening of Europe;
· reciprocal images of Europe and other parts of the world.
Activities here will form part of the "new dialogue between Europe and its neighbouring regions – the southern Mediterranean, the Middle East and Central Asia" which both the Warsaw Action Plan (paragraph III, 6) and the Faro Declaration seek to promote.
Activities
iii) The image of the other in conflict situations: learning different histories as a means of rebuilding trust
The image of the other in conflict and post-conflict situations is crucially important to the processes of reconciliation and establishing trust-based relationships.
This is a field in which the Council of Europe already has a substantial body of achievement that reflects, in particular, recent bilateral and regional co-operation. It should be remembered that as long ago as 1950 the Council’s first co-operation activity in the field of education was the analysing of history textbooks with a view to avoiding stereotyping.
This part of the project will seek to consolidate the conclusions of recent activities by exploring earlier examples of reconciliation processes which involved developing new perceptions of the conflicting parties’ histories. The lessons to be learned from these experiences will receive special attention, with a view to the potential role of history teaching in preventing crimes against humanity.
4. Project method and management structure
· Establishment of a project group
A select project group, comprising eleven experts has been established.
The group members are : a member of the CD-ED, historians with particular experience in the field, professionals involved in training history teachers and related disciplines, representatives of bodies other than schools (eg museums, resource centres or media organisations), a ministerial administrator with relevant experience and representatives from the two main INGO’s active in this context (Euroclio and the European Teachers Association).
Other partners (other parts of the Organisation, International Organisations and International Non-Governmental Organisations) will also be invited to send a representative to meetings when issues to which they are related will be on the agenda.
· Emphasis on practice
In each of the work areas suggested above, the CD-ED proposed that the issues should be addressed on the basis of examples of innovation or good practice. These examples would be identified not just in traditional teaching materials for use exclusively in the classroom but also in the full range of activities, projects and other initiatives, both in school and outside it, through which people learn about history.
· Cross-disciplinary approach
As explained above, the project forms part of the Council of Europe’s overall effort to promote intercultural dialogue and will contribute to the drafting of the White Paper on the intercultural dialogue. Rather than simply being tacked on to other initiatives, however, it will be fully integrated, the various project activities being carried out in conjunction with activities under the headings of education for citizenship, culture and heritage, youth, social affairs or human rights, as appropriate.
· Dissemination
By establishing at the outset a network of institutions that train history or related disciplines teachers, the project will have a means of accurately identifying demand (particularly for teaching materials). As the work progresses, the network could gradually begin to function as a professional distribution system for the publications produced.
· Evaluation
Alongside internal evaluation procedures, detailed activity reports will be submitted to the Steering Committee for education (CD-ED) so that it can carry out in-depth evaluation of the project’s progress each time it meets.