As stated in the United Nations’ Vienna Declaration of 1993, “All human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent and interrelated”.

The unity and indivisibility of fundamental rights, including civil and political rights on the one hand and social and economic rights on the other hand, has been recognised since the adoption in 1948 of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

When it came to giving binding legal force to the rights in the Universal Declaration, the Council of Europe adopted two separate treaties, at an interval of about 10 years :


As a result, the development of the normative systems relating to these rights has followed a different tempo and brought to some substantial differences in the relevant monitoring mechanisms.
 

The evolution of the Charter and the Convention within the Council of Europe: a comparative overview


Despite these differences, the abovementioned systems are complementary and interdependent and many of the rights protected under the Convention and its Protocols are also regulated, sometimes with greater detail, under the 1961 Charter, its Additional Protocol of 1988 and the Revised Charter, adopted in 1996.

This is the case as regards trade unions’ rights, which are generically protected as a freedom of assembly and association under Article 11 of the Convention, but find a more specific identification of positive obligations to be fulfilled under Articles 5, 6 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter and Article 28 of the Revised Charter.

The rights to life and to protection from inhuman or degrading treatment, covered by Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention are also taken into account in several provisions of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter, dealing for example with concrete measures to be implemented in the working place to preserve the life and health of workers, including in relation to maternity or in respect of young or disabled workers (Articles 3, 7, 8, 15), the protection of women against domestic violence (Article 16), the right to emergency social and medical assistance to anybody in need (Article 13), as well as in relation to sexual or moral harassment (Article 26 of the Revised Charter); more generally, any other right dealing with the protection of human dignity (for example, Articles 26, 30, 31 of the Revised Charter).

The protection of health and of the environment, which under the case-law developed under the Convention has been covered mainly under Articles 2 and 3 or Article 8, has a specific protection under Article 11 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter. In the same framework, Article 13 sets criteria for the concrete measures needed to ensure an effective medical assistance.

The prohibition of slavery and forced labour, set forth by Article 4 of the Convention, is also covered by Article 1 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter. The procedural rights relating to liberty and security, to fair trial and to the lawfulness of sanctions, covered by Articles 5, 6 and 7 of the Convention, are taken into account by Article 17 as regards the treatment of young offenders and by Article 19 as regards the expulsion of migrant workers. More generally, the requirements of a fair trial and of the effectiveness of remedies, set forth by Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, are also applicable to any provision of the Charter’s normative system where the availability and effectiveness of remedies is monitored.

Several aspects falling under Article 8 of the Convention (respect for private and family life) form the object of specific rights and concrete positive obligations under the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter, for example as regards the workers’ right to privacy under Article 1, the status of children born outside wedlock under Article 17, or the placement of children under Article 16.

The right to education, set forth by Article 2 of Protocol No. 2 to the Convention is developed in detail in Articles 7, 9, 10, 15, 19 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter.

Certain aspects relating to the rights covered by Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention (freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression) are taken into account in the Charter’s normative system for example with regard to the right to be informed on health risks, workers’ rights to information or migrant workers’ rights to education in their own language (1961 Charter, Additional Protocol to the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter).

While the Convention protects under its Article 12 the right to marry and under Article 5, Protocol No. 7, the equality between spouses, the rights and obligations of spouses are covered by Article 16 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter.

Certain rights related to freedom of movement and expulsion from the territory of a State (Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention) are covered by Articles 18 and 19 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter.

The prohibition of discrimination is set forth by Article 14 of the Convention and in its Protocol No. 12. In this respect, specific provisions of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter explicit protection against discrimination based on property status (Article 13), disability (Article 15), nationality (Article 19), sex and age (Article 1 of the Additional Protocol of 1988 to the 1961 Charter and Article 20 of the Revised Charter), as well as family status (Article 27 of the Revised Charter). The prohibition of discrimination is specifically ensured by virtue of Article E of the Revised Charter.

Some further connections exist in respect of the right to protection of property, covered by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and by many provisions of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter dealing for example with salary, benefits, etc. (Articles 4 and 12 of the 1961 and Revised Charter), as well as with housing evictions (Article 31 of the Revised Charter).

The connections between the Convention and Charter normative systems are taken into account by the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights in their assessment of the cases submitted to them and the criteria applied are very similar: both the Court and the Committee assess the implementation in practice of the protected rights and check that the restrictions are provided by law and necessary in a democratic society.

Through their ever-developing case-law, the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights ensure that all human rights – be them civil and political rights or social and economic rights – are effectively protected in a complementary and progressive way.

Indietro Gender pay gap is still persistent in Europe

The European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) has adopted 15 decisions (see links below) on state compliance with the right to equal pay, as well as the right to equal opportunities in the workplace, following complaints which were lodged within the framework of the collective complaints procedure by the international NGO University Women Europe (UWE). The decisions concern the 15 States which have accepted the complaints procedure (Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia and Sweden). The decisions were adopted by the ECSR on 5 and 6 December 2019 and became public on 29 June 2020.

The decisions identify clear and strong standards in the field of equal pay and, more precisely, they require that the right to equal pay has to be guaranteed in law (UWE Decisions Factsheet). The ECSR has identified the following obligations for States:

  • To recognise the right to equal pay for equal work or work of equal value in their legislation;
  • To ensure access to effective remedies for victims of pay discrimination;
  • To ensure and guarantee pay transparency and enable pay comparisons;
  • To maintain effective equality bodies and relevant institutions in order to ensure equal pay in practice.

Moreover, the right to equal pay implies the obligation to adopt measures to promote it. This obligation has two elements: on the one hand, collecting reliable and standardised data to measure and analyse the gender pay gap and, on the other hand, designing effective policies and measures aimed at reducing the gender pay gap on the basis of an analysis of the data collected. The States are also under an obligation to show measurable progress in reducing the gender pay gap.

The ECSR acknowledges that the gender pay gap is no longer solely or even primarily a result of discrimination as such. The gap arises mainly from differences in the so-called “average characteristics” of women and men in the labour market. These differences result from many factors, such as horizontal segregation, where there is the concentration of one sex in certain economic activities (sectoral gender segregation) or the concentration of one sex in certain occupations (occupational gender segregation), as well as vertical segregation. The decisions highlight the positive obligations of States to tackle these phenomena in the labour market, including by promoting the advancement of women in decision-making positions within private companies.

14 out of the 15 States were found to be in violation of one or more of the above-mentioned aspects of the obligation to guarantee the right to equal pay and the right to equal opportunities in the workplace. However, the ECSR also noted various positive developments. Measures taken by some States in recent years have led to some progress in reducing the gender pay gap, but the progress is slow. The ECSR’s decisions clearly demonstrate that problems and practices, such as segregation in the labour market, lack of pay transparency, secrecy regarding pay levels, obstacles to access effective remedies and retaliatory dismissals continue to exist and prevent full realisation of the equal pay principle.

The decisions on the merits of the complaints lodged by UWE:

No. 124/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Belgium

No. 125/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Bulgaria

No. 126/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Croatia

No. 127/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Cyprus

No. 128/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Czech Republic

No. 129/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Finland

No. 130/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. France

No. 131/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Greece

No. 132/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Ireland

No. 133/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Italy

No. 134/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. the Netherlands

No. 135/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Norway

No. 136/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Portugal

No. 137/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Slovenia

No. 138/2016 University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Sweden

Strasbourg, France 29/06/2020
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page

Department of Social Rights

Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law
Council of Europe
1, quai Jacoutot
F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex

Tél. +33 (0)3 90 21 49 61

www.coe.int/socialcharter

@CoESocialRights

 

Contact us