As stated in the United Nations’ Vienna Declaration of 1993, “All human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent and interrelated”.

The unity and indivisibility of fundamental rights, including civil and political rights on the one hand and social and economic rights on the other hand, has been recognised since the adoption in 1948 of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

When it came to giving binding legal force to the rights in the Universal Declaration, the Council of Europe adopted two separate treaties, at an interval of about 10 years :


As a result, the development of the normative systems relating to these rights has followed a different tempo and brought to some substantial differences in the relevant monitoring mechanisms.
 

The evolution of the Charter and the Convention within the Council of Europe: a comparative overview


Despite these differences, the abovementioned systems are complementary and interdependent and many of the rights protected under the Convention and its Protocols are also regulated, sometimes with greater detail, under the 1961 Charter, its Additional Protocol of 1988 and the Revised Charter, adopted in 1996.

This is the case as regards trade unions’ rights, which are generically protected as a freedom of assembly and association under Article 11 of the Convention, but find a more specific identification of positive obligations to be fulfilled under Articles 5, 6 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter and Article 28 of the Revised Charter.

The rights to life and to protection from inhuman or degrading treatment, covered by Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention are also taken into account in several provisions of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter, dealing for example with concrete measures to be implemented in the working place to preserve the life and health of workers, including in relation to maternity or in respect of young or disabled workers (Articles 3, 7, 8, 15), the protection of women against domestic violence (Article 16), the right to emergency social and medical assistance to anybody in need (Article 13), as well as in relation to sexual or moral harassment (Article 26 of the Revised Charter); more generally, any other right dealing with the protection of human dignity (for example, Articles 26, 30, 31 of the Revised Charter).

The protection of health and of the environment, which under the case-law developed under the Convention has been covered mainly under Articles 2 and 3 or Article 8, has a specific protection under Article 11 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter. In the same framework, Article 13 sets criteria for the concrete measures needed to ensure an effective medical assistance.

The prohibition of slavery and forced labour, set forth by Article 4 of the Convention, is also covered by Article 1 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter. The procedural rights relating to liberty and security, to fair trial and to the lawfulness of sanctions, covered by Articles 5, 6 and 7 of the Convention, are taken into account by Article 17 as regards the treatment of young offenders and by Article 19 as regards the expulsion of migrant workers. More generally, the requirements of a fair trial and of the effectiveness of remedies, set forth by Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, are also applicable to any provision of the Charter’s normative system where the availability and effectiveness of remedies is monitored.

Several aspects falling under Article 8 of the Convention (respect for private and family life) form the object of specific rights and concrete positive obligations under the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter, for example as regards the workers’ right to privacy under Article 1, the status of children born outside wedlock under Article 17, or the placement of children under Article 16.

The right to education, set forth by Article 2 of Protocol No. 2 to the Convention is developed in detail in Articles 7, 9, 10, 15, 19 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter.

Certain aspects relating to the rights covered by Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention (freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression) are taken into account in the Charter’s normative system for example with regard to the right to be informed on health risks, workers’ rights to information or migrant workers’ rights to education in their own language (1961 Charter, Additional Protocol to the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter).

While the Convention protects under its Article 12 the right to marry and under Article 5, Protocol No. 7, the equality between spouses, the rights and obligations of spouses are covered by Article 16 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter.

Certain rights related to freedom of movement and expulsion from the territory of a State (Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention) are covered by Articles 18 and 19 of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter.

The prohibition of discrimination is set forth by Article 14 of the Convention and in its Protocol No. 12. In this respect, specific provisions of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter explicit protection against discrimination based on property status (Article 13), disability (Article 15), nationality (Article 19), sex and age (Article 1 of the Additional Protocol of 1988 to the 1961 Charter and Article 20 of the Revised Charter), as well as family status (Article 27 of the Revised Charter). The prohibition of discrimination is specifically ensured by virtue of Article E of the Revised Charter.

Some further connections exist in respect of the right to protection of property, covered by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and by many provisions of the 1961 Charter and Revised Charter dealing for example with salary, benefits, etc. (Articles 4 and 12 of the 1961 and Revised Charter), as well as with housing evictions (Article 31 of the Revised Charter).

The connections between the Convention and Charter normative systems are taken into account by the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights in their assessment of the cases submitted to them and the criteria applied are very similar: both the Court and the Committee assess the implementation in practice of the protected rights and check that the restrictions are provided by law and necessary in a democratic society.

Through their ever-developing case-law, the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights ensure that all human rights – be them civil and political rights or social and economic rights – are effectively protected in a complementary and progressive way.

Indietro Several problems relating to health and social protection still persist in Europe

ECSR Conclusions 2021
Several problems relating to health and social protection still persist in Europe

The European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) today published its conclusions 2021 in respect of 33 States* on the articles of the Charter relating to the thematic group “Health, social security and social protection”. Germany and Iceland submitted their reports too late and therefore the Committee did not adopt any conclusions in respect of these two countries.

In the framework of the reporting procedure, the Committee adopted 401 conclusions, including 165 conclusions of non-conformity and 110 conclusions of conformity with the Charter. In 126 cases, the Committee was unable to assess the situation due to insufficient information ("deferrals").

In its targeted questions to States Parties, the Committee included several questions relating to the health and safety regulations in evolving new situations such as in the digital and platform economy, the social protection coverage of platform workers or the regulation of excessive working hours and the right to disconnect.

With regard to health and safety for workers in the digital or platform economy, the Committee found that in some countries self-employed and domestic workers were not covered by occupational health and safety regulations.

In many countries, the number of accidents at work (including fatal accidents) and occupational diseases is still high or increasing and, according to the Committee, the measures taken to improve the situation are not always sufficient. In some cases, the national labour inspectorates are not efficient enough due to staff shortages, low number of inspection visits or repetitive absence of different types of information.

With regard to the right to health, the information on life expectancy provided by States and other sources reveals that wide differences exist between men and women, regions, urban and rural areas, income and level of education.

Furthermore, the Committee found that many States have failed to take adequate steps to address the persistently high levels of infant and maternal mortality, which when examined together with other basic health indicators, pointed to weaknesses in the health system. Public healthcare expenditure remains too low in certain countries and the right to access to health care is not guaranteed sufficiently. The level of awareness and education with respect to sexual orientation and gender identity and to gender-based violence is not sufficient is several countries.

With respect to the obligation by States to prevent as far as possible epidemic, endemic and other diseases, the Committee noted the absence of efficient immunisation and epidemiological monitoring programmes, the lack of legislation prohibiting the sale and use of asbestos or the lack of lack of sufficient measures to ensure access to safe drinking water in rural areas.

The Committee once again found little or no progress in many States Parties as regards social security. Inadequate minimum level of income-replacement benefits is still the main ground of non-conformity. The minimum levels of unemployment benefit, sickness benefit and disability benefit in many countries fall below 40% of median equivalised income. The Committee did note that in some States Parties the levels have risen at a higher rate than the median income. However, they remain low or sometimes fall between 40 and 50% of the median income.

Regrading social security coverage for persons employed or whose work is managed through digital platforms, many States Parties were unable to provide information and the Committee had to defer its conclusion.

In many States Parties to the Charter, the level of social assistance paid to a single person without resources remains below the poverty threshold. In addition, excessive length of residence conditions often prevents lawfully resident foreigners to access social and medical assistance.

With regard to the rights of older persons, the Committee found that in many States Parties older persons lack adequate resources enabling them to lead a decent life and play an active role in the community. Legislation prohibiting discrimination outside employment is still lacking in certain States.

The Committee noted the devastating effects of Covid-19 on older persons and emphasised the importance of moving away from institutionalisation towards community-based care and independent living for older persons.

Last but not least, the Committee concluded that in many countries the poverty level is far too high, and the measures taken to remedy this fundamental problem have been insufficient and the situation has been exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Nevertheless, the Committee noted with satisfaction the adoption in some countries of various measures to strengthen health and safety at work, access to healthcare for the homeless, health and sexuality education at schools, or positive measures regarding the rights of LGBTI persons.

Furthermore, the Committee made public its Findings 2021 in respect of eight States (Belgium, Bulgaria, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy and Portugal) bound by the collective complaints procedure concerning the follow-up given to decisions on the merits of collective complaints in which the Committee found a violation.

* Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Romania, the Russian Federation[1], Serbia, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine and the United Kingdom

  Press conference video recording EN | FR

  Press Briefing Conclusions 2021

  Highlights Conclusions 2021

  Press Briefing Findings 2021

  Country profiles

[1] These conclusions were adopted while the Russian Federation was a Contracting Party to the European Social Charter. The information set out herein reflects that fact. However, subsequently, by decision of 16 March 2022 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, on that day the Russian Federation ceased to be a member of the Council of Europe.

Strasbourg, France 23/03/2022
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page

Department of Social Rights

Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law
Council of Europe
1, quai Jacoutot
F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex

Tél. +33 (0)3 90 21 49 61

www.coe.int/socialcharter

@CoESocialRights

 

Contact us