The European Committee of Social Rights   (ECSR) monitors compliance with the European Social Charter under two separate procedures:

 through collective complaints lodged by the social partners and non-governmental organisations (Collective Complaints procedure) and;
through reports drawn up by States parties (Reporting procedure).

 The reporting procedure is set out in Part IV of the 1961 Charter as amended by the 1991 Turin Protocol  (ETS No. 142), which despite not having entered into force is being applied on the basis of a unanimous decision taken by the Committee of Ministers.

 

 

 

 

he Reporting system: an overview

 

The European Committee of Social Rights monitors compliance with the Charter under two separate procedures: through collective complaints lodged by the social partners and non-governmental organisations (Collective Complaints procedure) and through reports drawn up by States parties (Reporting system).

 

The Reporting system is formally governed by Articles 21-29 of the 1961 Charter.

 

In the framework of the reporting system, States Parties regularly submit a report on the implementation of the Charter in law and in practice.

 

These reports are examined by the European Committee of Social Rights, which decides whether the national situations they describe comply with the Charter.

 

The decisions adopted by the Committee in the framework of this monitoring system, called conclusions, are published every year. They can be consulted using the European Social Charter Case law Database (HUDOC Charter).

 

Insofar as they refer to binding legal provisions and are adopted by a monitoring body established by the Charter, the conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights must be respected by the States concerned; however, they are not enforceable in the domestic legal systems.

In practice, this means that when the Committee rules that the situation in a country is not in compliance with the Charter, one cannot require the Committee’s conclusions to be enforced in domestic law as would be the case with a ruling by a court in the State concerned.

 

As the decisions adopted by the European Committee of Social Rights in the framework of the Collective Complaints procedure, the conclusions adopted within the reporting system are declaratory; in other words, they set out the law.

On this basis, national authorities are required to take measures to give them effect under domestic law. In this connection, domestic courts can declare invalid or set aside domestic legislation if the Committee has ruled that it is not in compliance with the Charter.

 

Drafting reports

 

Following the form for the reports to be submitted in pursuance of the Charter, national reports should give for each accepted provision of the Charter any pertinent information on measures adopted to ensure its application, mentioning in particular:

-    the legal framework – any laws or regulations, collective agreements or other provisions that contribute to such application; as well as where relevant pertinent national case-law – relevant decisions by courts and other judicial bodies;

-    the measures taken (administrative arrangements, programmes, action plans, projects, etc.) to implement the legal framework;

-    any pertinent figures, statistics or any other relevant information enabling an evaluation of the extent to which these provisions are applied.

States parties reports should be accompanied by the principal laws and regulations on which the application of the accepted provisions of the Charter is based.

 

The reports should, wherever appropriate, specify explicitly:

-    whether they are only concerned with the situation of nationals or whether they apply equally to the nationals of the other Parties;

-    whether they are valid for the national territory in its entirety;

-    whether they apply to all categories of persons included in the scope of the provision.

 

The information required, especially statistics, should, unless otherwise stated, be supplied for the period covered by the report. Where statistics are requested for any provision, it is understood that, if complete statistics are lacking, States parties may supply data or estimates based on ad hoc studies, specialised or sample surveys, or other scientifically valid methods, whenever they consider the information so collected to be useful and ensuring that the administrative effort required to collect data is in proportion with the desired acquisition of information.

 

The first State report following the entry into force of the Charter in respect of the State concerned should contain detailed information on all relevant aspects of the provision, whereas for subsequent reports it will suffice to up-date the information on the legal framework given in previous reports.

 

However, each report should contain appropriate explanations and/or information relating to developments of the situation in practice during the reference period.  In addition, it is recalled that each report, except the first report, shall contain replies to any questions raised by the European Committee of Social Rights in its conclusions, whether questions of a general nature addressed to all States (such questions appear in the “general introduction”) or specific questions contained in the conclusions proper in respect of each State for each provision.

 

The reporting system in motion

 

In the early 1990s a reform of the reporting system was set in motion. The aim was to make the Charter more effective and efficient. The reform culminated in 1991 in a Protocol amending the Charter. This text improved the reporting system. It confirmed the political role of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe and clarified the powers and responsibilities of the European Committee of Social Rights. The Protocol also increased the participation of the social partners and non-governmental organisations in the system.

 

Most countries have ratified the abovementioned Protocol, but it has still not come into force. It still requires ratification by, and, in some cases, the signature of four Council of Europe’s member States. Given this situation, in a decision taken unanimously by the States party to the Charter, the Committee of Ministers requested them to envisage the application of certain of the measures provided for in this Protocol before its entry into force, in so far as the text of the Charter will allow. Since 1992 then, and still in accordance with the 1961 Charter, the Reporting system has taken account of the new provisions in articles 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 of the Protocol in question.

 

In addition to the innovations arising from the Protocol of 1991 and in accordance with Article 21 of the Charter, the Committee of Ministers has over the years introduced specific rules regarding the presentation of reports by States parties. In response to the difficulties in applying these rules, they have been modified and rationalised on a number of occasions – (cf. Committee of Ministers' decisions adopted in 1984, 1989, 1992, 1995, 1996, 1999 and 2006).

 

Following the decision taken by the Committee of Ministers in 2006, the provisions the Charter have been divided into four thematic groups. States parties present a report on the provisions relating to one of the four thematic groups on an annual basis. Consequently each provision of the Charter is reported on once every four years.

 

The four groups of provisions are as follows:

Group 1: Employment, training and equal opportunities / Article 1 - Article 9 - Article 10 - Article 15 – Article 18 - Article 20 - Article 24 - Article 25.

Group 2: Health, social security and social protection / Article 3 - Article 11 - Article 12 - Article 1 - Article 14 - Article 23 - Article 30.

Group 3: Labour rights : Article 2 - Article 4 - Article 5 - Article 6 - Article 21 - Article 22 - Article 26 - Article 28 - Article 29.

Group 4: Children, families, migrants / Article 7 - Article 8 - Article 16 - Article 17 - Article 19 - Article 27 - Article 31.

 

In April 2014, the Committee of Ministers adopted new changes to the Charter’s monitoring system. The most important aim of the changes is to simplify the reporting system for States Parties having accepted the Collective Complaints procedure (see relevant list); the changes can be summarised as follows:

States which have accepted the Collective Complaints procedure will submit a simplified report every two years. To prevent this simplification from causing excessive fluctuations in the workload of the European Committee of Social Rights from year to year, the States which have accepted the collective complaints procedure so far have been divided into two groups. The groups are composed by distributing the States according to the number of complaints registered against them (from the highest to the lowest), as follows:

-     Group A, made up of eight States: France, Greece, Portugal, Italy, Belgium, Bulgaria, Ireland, Finland;

-      Group B, made up of seven States: Netherlands, Sweden, Croatia, Norway, Slovenia, Cyprus, Czech Republic.

Following the enforcement of these changes, the monitoring system functions as follows:

 

Normal report

Simplified report

October 2014

Provisions from Group 4

Children, families, migrants

All states except the ones from group A

States from group A

October 2015

Provisions from Group 1

Employment, training and equal opportunities

All states except the ones from group B

States from group B

October 2016

Provisions from Group 2

Heal, social security and social protection

All states except the ones from group B

States from group B

October 2017

Provisions from Group 3

Labour rights

All states except the ones from group A

States from group A

October 2018

Provisions from Group 4

Children, families, migrants

All states except the ones from group B

States from group B

October 2019

Provisions from Group 1

Employment, training and equal opportunities

All states except the ones from group A

States from group A

October 2020

Provisions from Group 2

Heal, social security and social protection

All states except the ones from group A

States from group A

October 2021

Provisions from Group 3

Labour rights

All states except the ones from group B

States from group B

etc.

   

States which draw up a simplified report are required to state what follow-up action has been taken in response to the decisions of the European Committee of Social Rights on collective complaints and reply to any questions put in the event of deferrals for the relevant provisions.

As new States accept the collective complaints procedure, they will be assigned on an alternating basis to Group B then Group A, then to Group B again, and so on. The new system enters into force for all States which have already accepted the collective complaints procedure from October 2014 onwards and, for other States, one year after acceptance.

For more information on the changes described above, it is possible to consult the full document on which the decision of the Committee of Ministers was based (Decision of the Committee of Ministers). Other information on the reform can also be found in the following document: Streamlining and improving the reporting and monitoring system of the European Social Charter

 

The rules in force

 

In compliance with the Committee of Ministers’ decisions of 2006 and 2014, States are currently required to drawing up their report on the basis of the following rules:

 

Reference period

Thematic groups / Articles

Date of submission of reports

Normal report

Simplified report

Adoption of the Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights


01/01/2010-
31/12/2013

Group 4
Children, family, migrants

Article 7
Article 8
Article 16
Article 17
Article 19
Article 27
Article 31

31/10/2014

All states except the ones from group A

States from Group A1

December 2015

01/01/2011-
31/12/2014

Group 1
Employment, training and equal opportunities

Article 1
Article 9
Article 10
Article 15
Article 18
Article 20*
Article 24
Article 25

31/10/2015

All states except the ones from group B

States from Group B2

December 2016

01/01/2012-
31/12/2015

Group 2
Health, social security and social protection

Article 3
Article 11
Article 12
Article 13
Article 14
Article 23*
Article 30

31/10/2016

All states except the ones from group B

States from Group B2

December 2017

01/01/2013-
31/12/2016

Group 3
Labour rights

Article 2
Article 4
Article 5
Article 6
Article 21*
Article 22*
Article 26
Article 28
Article 29

31/10/2017

All states except the ones from group A

States from Group A1

December 2018


01/01/2014-
31/12/2017

Group 4
Children, family, migrants

Article 7
Article 8
Article 16
Article 17
Article 19
Article 27
Article 31

31/10/2018

All states except the ones from group B

States from Group B2

December 2019

01/01/2015-
31/12/2018

Group 1
Employment, training and equal opportunities

Article 1
Article 9
Article 10
Article 15
Article 18
Article 20*
Article 24
Article 25

31/10/2019

All states except the ones from group A

States from Group A1

December 2020

_____________

1 States in Group A: France, Greece, Portugal, Italy, Belgium, Bulgaria, Ireland, Finland
2 States in Group B: Netherlands, Sweden, Croatia, Norway, Slovenia, Cyprus, Czech Republic
* NB: Articles 20, 21, 22 and 23 of the Revised Charter correspond to Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the 1998 Additional Protocol.

Follow-up by the Committee of Ministers of the Conclusions adopted by the European Committee of Social Rights in the framework of the Reporting system

 

The Committee of Ministers intervenes in the last stage of the reporting system. After receiving the conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights, the Committee of Ministers adopts a Resolution by a majority of two-thirds of those voting. The resolution closes each supervision cycle and may contain individual recommendations to the States parties concerned.

 

When the European Committee of Social Rights concludes that a situation is not in conformity, the State Party has to bring the situation into conformity. If the State takes no action, the Committee of Ministers may address a Recommendation to that State, asking it to change the situation in law and/or in practice. In view of the importance of this decision, a two-thirds majority of those voting is required here.

In the case of both resolutions and recommendations, only States parties to the Charter may take part in the vote.

 

In the framework of the Reporting system, the Committee of Ministers’ work is prepared by the Governmental Committee of the European Social Charter and European Code of Social Security, comprising representatives of the governments of the States Parties to the Charter, assisted by observers representing European employers’ organisations and trade unions (European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), Business Europe (ex UNICE) and International Organisation of Employers (IOE).

Texts adopted by the Committee of Ministers in the framework of the Reporting system are available on line on the Committee of Ministers’ website. It is also possible to retrieve these texts by performing a search on HUDOC Charter data base system.

Ultimately, it falls to the Committee to determine whether the situation has been brought into compliance with the Charter. This is done by the Committee in the framework of the Reporting system or the Collective Complaints procedure.

 

 

 

 

 

National reports

States Parties regularly submit a report on the implementation of the Charter in law and in practice. National reports are examined by the ECSR, which rules on whether the national situations they describe comply with the Charter (See further information about Drafting reports).

Conclusions

The European Committee of Social Rights examines the national reports and any comments received from third parties, as well as any information received in meetings. It then, makes a legal assessment of the conformity of the situation and adopts conclusions regarding the implementation of the European Social Charter by each of the States concerned.

The ECSR conclusions  can be consulted on the European Social Charter HUDOC Database.

events

Back Exchange of views between Karin Lukas, President of the European Committee of Social Rights, and the Committee of Ministers Delegates

Exchange of views between Karin Lukas, President of the European Committee of Social Rights, and the Committee of Ministers Delegates

In her exchange of views with the Committee of Ministers Delegates, Karin Lukas, President of the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR), emphasised that during her mandate the Committee has consistently aimed to interpret the Charter in the light of present-day conditions to keep up with the drastic changes impacting social rights and to better protect rights bearers, especially the most vulnerable. 

The successive crises which have rippled worldwide, have put extreme strain on the enjoyment of social rights by many on our continent. In this context, Karin Lukas underlined the adoption by the Committee of Ministers of an ambitious reform package of the Charter system in September 2022, after a broad consultation process under the aegis of GT-CHARTE. She recalled that the main objective of the reform was to render the reporting procedure lighter and more targeted, strengthen the role of the Governmental Committee and enhance the dialogue among stakeholders. 

She also informed the Ministers’ Deputies that the European Committee of Social Rights has decided to strengthen its follow-up on non-accepted provisions. For this purpose, in addition to reporting on non-accepted provisions, meetings with the authorities and other stakeholders will resume in order to identify or create opportunities for accepting further provisions. In addition, and in line with decisions of the Deputies, this process will also include States Parties bound by the 1961 Charter*, with the aim not only of increasing the number of accepted provisions but also of encouraging them to ratify the Revised Charter. 

Karin Lukas also emphasised that the addition of new rights to the Charter should be given proper consideration in order to take full account of the evolving social context and expectations of European citizens. 

Finally, Karin Lukas stressed that, for the reform to be truly successful and in order to maintain the quality and relevance of the Charter, it is crucial to provide the European Committee of Social Rights and its Secretariat with adequate resources. 

  Intervention of Karin Lukas before the Committee of Ministers Delegates

* These states are Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Iceland, Luxembourg, Poland and the United Kingdom.

Strasbourg, France 03/11/2022
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page
direct link
Contacts

Department of Social Rights

Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law
Council of Europe
1, quai Jacoutot
F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex

Tél. +33 (0)3 90 21 49 61

www.coe.int/socialcharter

@CoESocialRights

 

Contact us