Please select Recommendations and/or countries from the drop-down list on the right side.

Back Social and economic impact of cultural heritage. Opinion polls report

Social and economic impact of cultural heritage. Opinion polls report

Location of the initiative:

 POLAND


Relation to Strategy 21 Recommendations:

S2 - Make heritage more accessible


Brief description of the initiative:

The social study (opinion polls) was conducted in 2011 by National Heritage Board of Poland as a part of their project "Legal and illicit trade with cultural heritage. Research and education platform of experience exchange in the field Of prevention from crime against cultural heritage" - co-financed by EEA Grants and Norway Grants. The poll focused not only on the legal aspects of citizens opinions, but also on other aspects of heritage social perception, what enabled NHB to present a report important for decision makers on both national and local level.


Objectives of the initiative:

  • to show, that citizens understand that heritage is - or may be - an agent of development and see the need of investment in heritage
  • to enable knowledge-based decisions for policy makers (by strict data showing people's approach)
  • to promote heritage and show what areas of knowledge and social awareness need enforcement and education)

Brief assessment of the initiative’s results:

The report was distributed free of charge around Poland to ensure better governance - based on knowledge acquired in the studies and presented in the report.

The report is available online.


Online resources:

http://www.nid.pl/upload/iblock/472/472e646a7a6f116cb09105f922695509.pdf


Contact:

Anna Kozioł
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
[email protected]

Filter by
Components
1. THE ”SOCIAL COMPONENT” (S)
S1
S10
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
2. THE “TERRITORIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT” COMPONENT (D)
D1
D10
D11
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7
D8
D9
3. THE “KNOWLEDGE AND EDUCATION COMPONENT” (K)
K1
K10
K11
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
K7
K8
K9
Countries and International Organisations
Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Europe
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Holy See
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Moldova
Romania
San Marino
Serbia
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
Ukraine
Unesco
United Kingdom
Reset Filter

The golden collection of good practices