Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  Slideshare

  Steering Committee (CDMSI)
  Bureau of the Committee (CDMSI-BU)
  Former Steering Committee (CDMC)
  Former Bureau of the Committee (CDMC-BU)
  Committee of Experts on Protection of Journalism and Safety of Journalists (MSI-JO)
  Committee of Experts on cross-border flow of Internet traffic and Internet freedom (MSI-INT)  
  Transfrontier Television
  Conditional Access
  Rights of Internet Users
  Information Society
  New Media
  Public Service Media Governance
  Cross-border Internet
  Protection Neighbouring Rights of Broadcasting Organisations
  Media Diversity
  Public service Media
  Conference Freedom of Expression and Democracy in the Digital Age - Opportunities, Rights, Responsibilities, Belgrade, 7-8/11/2013
  Conference "The Hate factor in political speech - Where do responsibilities lie?", Warsaw18-19 September 2013
  Conference of Ministers, Reykjavik - Iceland, 28-29 May 2009
  European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG)
  Committee of Ministers texts
  Parliamentary Assembly texts
  Ministerial Conferences
Useful links

Strasbourg, 1 December 2009






2nd meeting
22 October 2009
Agora Building – Room G.02





1. The second multilateral consultation meeting on the implementation of the Convention took place in Strasbourg on 22 October 2009.

2. The list of participants is set out in Appendix I. The agenda, as adopted, is shown in Appendix II; it also refers to the working documents.

Items 1 and 2 on the agenda: Opening of the meeting and information by the Secretariat

3. The Secretariat opened the meeting, welcomed the Delegates and Observers and recalled that the previous consultation meeting convoked in December 2007, had been an informal meeting due to the absence of the quorum of a majority of parties. It was noted that the Chairperson and the Vice-Chairperson of the meeting, Mr Hadjipavlou (Cyprus) and Ms Galchovski (Moldova), had reached the end of their four year mandate. According to article 7, paragraph 2 of the Rules of procedure, both could be re-elected for a second term.

Item 3 on the agenda: Election of the Chairperson and Vice-chairperson

4. Delegates noted with regret that due to a change in his duties, Mr Hadjipavlou, would not be available for a second mandate. Mr Tomislav Jelić, delegate of Croatia, was elected Chairperson and Mrs Vera Beutler, delegate of Switzerland, was elected Vice-Chairperson.

Item 4 on the agenda: Adoption of the agenda

5. The agenda, as reproduced in Appendix II, was adopted.

Item 5 on the agenda: Signatures and ratifications of the Convention

6. The Secretariat informed the participants that at present the Convention was ratified by 8 States (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, France, Moldova, the Netherlands, Romania and Switzerland) and signed by a further 3 States (Luxembourg, Norway and Russia). The observer delegate from Turkey said that his country was considering ratification of the Convention.

7. The observer delegate from the European Commission explained that accession of the European Community/EU to the Convention required a decision by the Council, on the Commission’s proposal. Last year, the Commission had initiated the accession procedure to the Convention by preparing such a proposal. Recently however, the Commission had interrupted the initiative for legal reasons: the difficulty resided in the fact that any amendment to the Convention would require approval by the Committee of Ministers. The Commission’s legal service regards this procedure as incompatible with the principle of equality of parties. In this context, the observer delegate of the European Commission doubted that the EU would encourage further ratification of the Convention. Several delegates expressed their surprise and concern about this situation and expressed the hope that a legal solution could be found. It was recalled that the texts of both instruments were very similar.

Item 6 on the agenda: Information on the implementation of Directive 98/84/EC by a representative of the European Commission

10. With regard to the lack of cross-border offers, the European Commission wishes to find a legal solution for the 9 million EU citizens living in another member state wishing to watch their national TV stations. At present they can only access these channels by a so-called “Grey-Market” (the European Court of Justice is examining a test-case on the subject). The EC is conducting a survey on potential markets represented by the “Grey Markets” and is planning to set up a working group (expert group) to address this issue.

Item 7 on the agenda: Exchange of views on the application of the Convention in States Parties

13. The Croatian delegation informed the meeting that all offences specified in Article 4 were reflected in the law. In addition, the new electronic media act developed in the context of the accession procedure to the EU, also covers protection of information society services. Possession of illegal devices for private purpose is equally prohibited. The delegate from Cyprus reported that 3 court cases involving offences as specified under Article 4 are pending before a court. The possession of illicit devices for personal use is not prohibited in Cyprus. However, the question is under discussion.

14. The delegate from Cyprus recalled that profits from illegal activities are known to be very high, the proportionality of sanctions remains therefore a difficult issue.

15. The delegate from Cyprus highlighted that in practice it was hard to find evidence for profits or gains resulting from unlawful activity.

16. No issues were raised

e. International co-operation (Article 8 of the Convention)

17. None of the parties reported examples of international cooperation. It was highlighted that devices found on border-controls were mostly legal.

18. In the light of the informal discussions held in 2007, the Secretariat had carried out an inquiry among Parties to obtain information on their national legislation and concerns having relevance to the implementation of the Convention. It had furthermore been decided to address a questionnaire to member states of the Council of Europe who had not ratified the Convention. The questionnaires and the replies received are set out in Document ECCA(2009)001.

19. The first questionnaire, addressed to the 8 Parties to the Convention, had received 5 replies. In reply to question I on the national legislation of relevance to the Convention, the inquiry gathered comprehensive information of the legal provisions applicable in Croatia, Cyprus, Moldova, Switzerland and the Netherlands. Switzerland indicated that the Swiss Penal Code also prohibited private fraudulent use of protected services. Question II, relating to the efficiency of the measures, revealed that Cyprus, Moldova and the Netherlands considered the measures foreseen in the existing legislation as sufficient. Switzerland indicated that it lacked reliable data to establish whether the level of protection provided by the application of the Convention is sufficient. Parties had no or hardly any information on relevant case-law. Question III, concerned the enforcement of legislation relating to the protection of conditional access services. In their replies all Parties indicated that the development and follow-up of a policy concerning protected services is shared by different State organs/bodies. Consultation between the relevant public authorities and representatives of protected services or other stakeholders is usually held during the preparation of new legislation. Only the Netherlands replied that there were “regularly consultations and meetings between the different parties involved”. There were no examples of international cooperation.

20. The second questionnaire, addressed to the 39 Council of Europe member States that had not yet ratified the Convention, received 22 replies, 13 of which were from EU member States. In reply to Question I, relating to the legal protection of conditional services, 18 States provided information on their legislation to protect conditional access services. Albania, Bosnia Herzegovina, Montenegro and Turkey indicated that legislation on this topic was under preparation. Question II regarding the usefulness and appropriateness of the CoE Convention, received a positive reply by 16 States, 4 had no opinion and 2 were of the opinion that the corresponding EU Directive was/might be sufficient. Question III, regarding existing plans or intentions to ratify the Convention was answered negatively by 11 States; 2 States, Armenia and Turkey, indicated they were considering ratification. The 9 remaining replies contained no clear indication about the willingness to ratify. The answers to question IV relating to the existence of other international instruments/bilateral agreements of relevance to the protection of conditional access services only mentioned the Directive 98/84 EC.

21. The Association of Commercial Television in Europe had also made a contribution to the inquiry with a statement highlighting the importance of the Convention and suggesting, inter alia, that consideration should be given to extend its scope to:
- non paid conditional access services;
- the personal possession, distribution and installation of an illicit device.

22. The delegate from Cyprus indicated that, given the difficulties encountered in implementing the existing convention, it was too early to consider amendments to its text.

Item 8 on the agenda: Follow-up and future work

23. The Delegations from Bulgaria and Romania who had not yet replied to the questionnaire agreed to do so as early as possible.

Item 9 on the agenda: Other business

24. In the afternoon, the ECCA delegates participated in a hearing organised by the CDMC during which the Chair summarised the outcome of the meeting. The Secretariat gave a summary of the outcome of the inquiry. The CDMC took note of the poor level of ratifications and of the interruption of the accession procedure by the European Union. The observer delegate representing the Association of Commercial Television in Europe (ACT) underlined the importance of the Convention for protected services and indicated its readiness to encourage further ratification.

Appendix I

List of participants


Mr Anani ANANIEV, Deputy to the Permanent Representative of Bulgaria to the Council of Europe
Tel: 03 88 61 95 29 Fax: 03 88 61 92 38 e-mail: a_ananiev@abv.bg

Mr Tomislav JELIĆ, Head of Department for European Integration, Ministry of Culture, Runjaninova 2, HR-1000 ZAGREB
Tel: +385 1 48 66 216 Fax: +385 1 48 66 280 e-mail: tomislav.jelic1@min-kulture.hr

Ms Nives ZVONARIC, Legal adviser, Electronic Media Agency
Tel: +385 1 48 82 610 Fax: + 385 1 48 82 614 e-mail: nives.zvonaric@zg.t-com.hr

Mr Constantinos HADJIPAVLOU, Chief Administrative Officer, Ministry of Justice and Public Order, Athalassa Ave 125, NICOSIA
Tel: +357 22 80 59 29 Fax: +357 22 805 966 e-mail: chadjipavlou@mjpo.gov.cy




Mr Attila SZASZ, Communication and European Affairs Directorate, CNA Romania, Bd Libertatii 14, 050706 Bucarest
Tel : + 40 21 30 55 353 e-mail: szasz.attila@cna.ro

Mrs Vera BEUTLER, Medienjuristin, Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communication DETEC, Federal Office of Communications OFCOM, Rue de l'Avenir 44, P.O. Box, CH 2501 BIENNE
Tel: +41 32 327 59 49 Fax: +41 32 327 55 33 e-mail: vera.beutler@bakom.admin.ch


Mr Ioannis MANTZOURANIS, Conseiller de presse, Représentation permanente de la Grèce, 21 Place Broglie, 67000 Strasbourg
Tel : 03 88 32 47 33 Fax : 03 88 75 53 30

Mrs Vasiliki KORDATOU, Attachée de presse, Représentation permanente de la Grèce, 21 Place Broglie, 67000 Strasbourg
Tel : 03 88 32 47 33 Fax : 03 88 75 53 30

Mr Knut-Fredrik Hustad, adviser, Norwegian Ministry of Justice e-mail: knut.hustad@jd.dep.no

Mr Arslan NARIN, Legal Advisor, Radio and Television Supreme Council, Bilkent Plaza B2 Block, 06530 Bilkent-Ankara

Mr Hasan Ali ERDEM, Expert of International Relations Department, Radio and Television Supreme Council, Bilkent Plaza B2 Block, 06530 Bilkent-Ankara

European Commission/Commission européenne
Mme Caroline LOUP, General Direction Internal Market, Unit E2 - Service II
Commission européenne, 200, rue de la Loi, BE-1049 Bruxelles
Tel: +32 2 299 56 55 Fax: +32 2 299 42 77 E-mail: Caroline.Loup@ec.europa.eu


Mrs Anita VAN DE KAR, Administrator, Media and Information Society Division, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs / Administratrice, Division Médias et société de l’information, Direction Générale des Droits de l'Homme et des Affaires Juridiques
Tel: +33 (0)3 88 41 29 29 Fax: +33 (0)3 88 41 27 05 E-mail: anita.vandekar@coe.int

Corinne Gavrilovic, Assistant, Media and Information Society Division, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs / Division Médias et société de l’information, Direction Générale des Droits de l'Homme et des Affaires Juridiques
Tel: +33 (0)3 90 21 57 42 Fax: +33 (0)3 88 41 27 05 E-mail: corinne.gavrilovic@coe.int


YOESLE Josette

Appendix II


1. Opening of the meeting

2. Information by the Secretariat

3. Election of the Chairperson and Vice-chairperson

4. Adoption of the agenda

5. Signatures and ratifications of the Convention

Working document

- Secretariat Memorandum
(Document ECCA(2009)002)

6. Information on the implementation of Directive 98/84/EC by a representative of the European Commission

7. Exchange of views on the application of the Convention in States Parties with regard to:

Working documents

- European Convention on the Legal Protection of Services Based on, or Consisting of, Conditional Access and its Explanatory Report

- Report of the first consultation meeting on the implementation of the Convention, including the Rules of procedure
(Document ECCA(2004)004)

- Responses to the questionnaire on the legal protection of broadcasting and information society services based on, or consisting of conditional access (Document ECCA(2009)001)

8. Follow-up and future work

9. Other business