< Viewpoints < 2006
“Human Rights Defenders must be
able to criticise”
[13/11/06] Even self-confident governments
sometimes tend to hit back when their human rights record is questioned.
Such overreactions may reflect a sense that good performance is particularly
important in the field of human rights and that criticism is therefore more
sensitive than otherwise.
In some cases, however, governments have aimed at the messenger instead of
answering the question. I have been surprised that leading politicians so
often talk negatively – in private or even publicly – about human rights
defenders in their own country.
Non-governmental human rights groups, journalists and even ombudsmen have
been accused of being unpatriotic – even in Europe – after reporting human
rights violations or having communicated with international organisations or
Factual errors, even minor ones, have sometimes been used to prove that such
defenders are irresponsible or act in bad faith.
This is not an attitude which promotes a serious dialogue. To require that
the reporting of non-governmental human rights must be flawless is not
reasonable – considering their limited resources and that governments
themselves are sometimes less than forthcoming with basic facts. In fact,
most such groups are very serious in their reporting.
The fact that some governments try to silence human rights activists
prompted a discussion in the United Nations some thirty years ago. In 1998,
after long discussions, the General Assembly adopted the UN Declaration on
the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to
Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental
This had been prompted by reports originating from different countries of an
outright repression of people who tried to monitor and report on violations;
who tried to mediate between authorities and aggrieved groups; or those who
simply tried to educate ordinary people about their rights. These people
were defined as human rights defenders in the declaration.
Even today, in some cases these individuals are deprived of basic freedoms
such as the freedom of movement, expression, assembly or association. Some
are targeted with criminal prosecution and made victims of unfair trials.
Some are arrested and tortured, and some others are even executed. The
declaration aims at putting an end to such unjustifiable responses.
One dilemma for the drafters of the text was to avoid the temptation to
define human rights defenders as a special group entitled to receive
protection on the basis of its belonging to that category. Indeed, no system
of authorisation or “licensing” was intended as it would have created new
dangers for those excluded from such a legal definition.
All the rights that defenders should be able to enjoy were already part of
the international human rights standards. The declaration, therefore, is
more focused on the implementation of such rights, which are particularly
important for those committed to the promotion of human rights – and who
have often been denied those rights.
The declaration emphasises that everyone has the right to promote, to
protect and to defend human rights, on national and international levels. It
reaffirms the right to form, join and participate in non-governmental
It further states that everyone has the right to hold and to publish
information about human rights and to complain about governmental policies
and actions. The declaration also spells out that there is a right to
unhindered access to international bodies and a right to receive and to
obtain funding for human rights activities.
The idea is not to give certain people special privileges but to make clear
that when individuals – together with others or alone – speak out for human
rights or work for them with other means, they should be free to do so
without being accused of extremism or targeted in defamation campaigns, or
Indeed, the UN wanted to demonstrate that these people are badly needed.
Typically, one inspiration behind the very notion of human rights defenders
was Andrei Sakharov, who was still alive when the declaration was agreed.
Even when Sakharov was locked up in an apartment in Gorky, he continued to
write his appeals for prisoners of conscience in the Soviet Union and other
countries. He gave Russians and others a moral message which is still felt.
Other voices have been silenced and this has had sad consequences. When the
declaration was adopted, the then UN Secretary–General, Kofi Annan, stated
the obvious lesson:
“When the rights of human rights defenders are violated, all our rights are
put in jeopardy and all of us are made less safe.”
UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders
A draft recommendation on the legal status of NGOs in Europe will be
finalised by the end of the year. The preliminary draft recommendation was
published on the Council of Europe website with a view to ensuring wide
consultation. It can be found at
This Viewpoint can be re-published
in newspapers or on the internet without our prior consent, provided that
the text is not modified and the original source is indicated in the
following way: "Also available at the Commissioner's website at