“Europe should remain a death penalty-free zone”
is now a death-penalty-free zone. All members of the Council of Europe have
abolished capital punishment in law or practice. This is great progress in the
struggle for human rights and must be protected against those who still argue
for a return to the days of executions.
The application of the death penalty violates the most fundamental of human
rights, the right to life and the right not to be subjected to cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment. Indeed, capital punishment has no place in civilised,
democratic societies governed by the rule of law. It is simply not compatible
with European values, as the European Commission reaffirmed recently in response
to the Polish President’s views on capital punishment.
This is not merely the position of human rights organisations. A consensus
between Council of Europe member states has been reached on the death penalty.
Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights, which abolishes the
death penalty in peacetime, has been ratified by all Council of Europe member
states, except one. Protocol No. 13 to the European Convention on Human Rights,
which concerns the abolition of the death penalty in war as well as peacetime,
has been signed by 44 out of 46 member states, and ratified by 36.
The second sentence of Article 2 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights
still provides for the death penalty (“No one shall be deprived of his life
intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his
conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law”). In my
opinion, the two Protocols and their wide support suggest that this sentence has
now become redundant. This is further demonstrated by the fact that abolition of
the death penalty is a precondition of membership to the Council of Europe. We
can clearly say that death as a punishment is no longer accepted on our
The trend towards abolition is not confined to Europe alone. The Council of
Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly is active in lobbying Japan and the United
States to abolish the death penalty, since these two countries have observer
status with the Organisation. European governments are working within the United
Nations and bilaterally for universal abolition, and with some success. Over
half the countries in the world have now abolished the death penalty in law or
Nevertheless, the global figures relating to the death penalty are still
disturbing. According to Amnesty International, at least 2 148 people were
executed in 22 countries in 2005, and at least 5 186 people were sentenced to
death in 53 countries. The true figures are certainly higher, as official
national statistics are often hard to come by. In the same year 94% of all known
executions took place in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United States.
Scientific studies have consistently failed to find convincing evidence that the
death penalty deters crime more effectively than other punishments. Violent
crime rates in abolitionist countries are not on the increase.
The 4th annual World Day Against the Death Penalty will be held on 10 October
2006. This year’s theme, “The death penalty: a failure of justice” will
highlight the failures of the systems which administer capital punishment, such
as race and class bias. As long as the death penalty is maintained, the risk of
executing the innocent can never be eliminated.
We must remind ourselves that no legal system is infallible. Since 1973 over 120
prisoners have been released from death row in the United States with evidence
of their innocence. Studies in the United States have shown that innocent people
have been sentenced to death and executed. Once exacted, the death penalty can
never be taken back.
Work still needs to be done to sensitise and inform the public on this issue.
This should include educational and awareness-raising activities against
recourse to the death penalty, particularly among the media and the general
public. We should demonstrate that abolition of the death penalty contributes to
the enhancement of human dignity and the progressive development of human
The Russian Federation has signed but not yet ratified Protocol No. 6,
although it has respected a moratorium on executions since 1996. The two
countries which have not signed Protocol No. 13 are the Russian Federation and
Azerbaijan. Those countries which have signed but have yet to ratify Protocol
No. 13 are Albania, Armenia, France, Italy, Latvia, Moldova, Poland and Spain.
This Viewpoint can be re-published
in newspapers or on the internet without our prior consent, provided that
the text is not modified and the original source is indicated in the
following way: "Also available at the Commissioner's website at